Edmonton Oilers vs Anaheim Ducks — April 30, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

ANA 5, EDM 2 — the Anaheim Ducks got the win on April 30, 2026. Not much separated the two teams at 5-on-5 by xG: ANA 2.69, EDM 2.90. Keep an eye on Poehling — 0.49 individual xG on 3 shots at 5-on-5. EDM had a big edge in high-danger chances, 11-4 over ANA at 5-on-5. Shots on goal: ANA 31, EDM 27.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Anaheim Ducks progressed on Apr 30, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

EDM2 - 5ANA

Apr 30, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
ANA	P1	19	21	47.5	16	16	50.0	11	7	61.1	14	12	53.8	1	4	20.0	0.97	1.09	47.2	3	1	75.0
	P2	28	21	57.1	23	13	63.9	15	10	60.0	17	16	51.5	2	5	28.6	1.52	1.09	58.3	1	0	100.0
	P3	10	20	33.3	8	16	33.3	5	10	33.3	5	10	33.3	1	2	33.3	0.55	0.91	37.5	1	1	50.0
	Total	57	62	47.9	47	45	51.1	31	27	53.4	36	38	48.6	4	11	26.7	3.04	3.09	49.6	5	2	71.4
EDM	P1	21	19	52.5	16	16	50.0	7	11	38.9	12	14	46.2	4	1	80.0	1.09	0.97	52.8	1	3	25.0
	P2	21	28	42.9	13	23	36.1	10	15	40.0	16	17	48.5	5	2	71.4	1.09	1.52	41.7	0	1	0.0
	P3	20	10	66.7	16	8	66.7	10	5	66.7	10	5	66.7	2	1	66.7	0.91	0.55	62.5	1	1	50.0
	Total	62	57	52.1	45	47	48.9	27	31	46.6	38	36	51.4	11	4	73.3	3.09	3.04	50.4	2	5	28.6

Win Probability

ANA Favored

EDM Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

ANA

EDM

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

EDM Attempts

ANA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

EDM ShootANA Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Takeaway

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (ANA) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = ANA players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the ANA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

ANA ↓ / EDM →	Draisaitl	McDavid	Nugent-Hopkins	Savoie	Roslovic	Dickinson	Dach	Lazar	Samanski	Hyman	Podkolzin	Kapanen	Bouchard	Nurse	Murphy	Walman	Ekholm	Emberson
Carlsson	77	70	29	44	50	38	40	100	75	36	67	83	64	60	40	50	50	80
Poehling	32	33	32	63	50	57	0	25	25	29	43	50	33	43	38	44	14	50
Granlund	39	47	36	83	100	80	100	100	100	60	56	36	63	83	75	60	60	53
Washe	58	58	25	33	0	0	—	0	0	33	42	60	57	43	20	40	63	43
McTavish	44	60	42	70	50	67	0	25	0	38	32	50	50	56	56	38	100	38
Killorn	44	53	36	75	75	75	80	100	100	54	60	53	60	90	78	57	56	53
Viel	52	61	38	50	33	—	0	0	0	46	44	63	63	36	22	44	75	43
Kreider	67	60	36	50	57	43	100	100	75	42	64	73	54	83	54	46	38	71
Gauthier	40	50	40	60	43	60	0	50	0	38	40	47	43	58	58	31	50	36
Terry	79	64	29	36	44	33	40	100	75	36	69	79	54	60	40	50	44	75
Sennecke	50	62	57	86	100	86	100	100	100	78	50	42	75	88	86	55	77	50
Carlson	56	64	38	43	43	33	33	38	33	48	45	52	71	42	33	43	75	53
LaCombe	53	55	27	64	50	63	—	100	100	36	53	69	53	88	90	40	50	43
Mintyukov	56	67	38	50	43	43	33	44	33	45	47	47	80	38	31	50	71	58
Trouba	49	52	21	33	40	29	—	100	100	33	50	63	51	82	80	30	45	23
Moore	50	64	33	100	67	—	0	0	0	38	31	62	69	30	13	45	71	25
Hinds	29	50	50	63	67	63	75	100	100	67	20	20	50	100	67	50	60	55
Helleson	50	67	60	86	100	86	75	100	100	67	50	33	67	100	67	88	60	88