Anaheim Ducks vs Edmonton Oilers — April 28, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Edmonton Oilers took down the Anaheim Ducks 4-1 on Tuesday. Dig into the 5-on-5 data, and ANA had the better of it (2.30 xG to 1.48). Sometimes the bounces just don't go your way. Draisaitl put up 2 goals. Leo Carlsson generated the most offense at even strength with 0.39 ixG on 4 shots. ANA held a slight 8-6 edge in high-danger chances.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Anaheim Ducks vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Apr 28, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

ANA1 - 4EDM

Apr 28, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
EDM	P1	24	12	66.7	18	8	69.2	12	6	66.7	17	9	65.4	5	2	71.4	1.57	0.63	71.3	3	0	100.0
	P2	11	20	35.5	9	15	37.5	5	11	31.3	8	12	40.0	2	5	28.6	0.53	1.00	34.4	1	1	50.0
	P3	3	29	9.4	3	20	13.0	3	13	18.8	0	15	0.0	0	3	0.0	0.07	1.09	6.4	0	0	—
	Total	38	61	38.4	30	43	41.1	20	30	40.0	25	36	41.0	7	10	41.2	2.17	2.72	44.3	4	1	80.0
ANA	P1	12	24	33.3	8	18	30.8	6	12	33.3	9	17	34.6	2	5	28.6	0.63	1.57	28.7	0	3	0.0
	P2	20	11	64.5	15	9	62.5	11	5	68.8	12	8	60.0	5	2	71.4	1.00	0.53	65.6	1	1	50.0
	P3	29	3	90.6	20	3	87.0	13	3	81.3	15	0	100.0	3	0	100.0	1.09	0.07	93.6	0	0	—
	Total	61	38	61.6	43	30	58.9	30	20	60.0	36	25	59.0	10	7	58.8	2.72	2.17	55.7	1	4	20.0

Win Probability

EDM Favored

ANA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

EDM

ANA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

ANA Attempts

EDM Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

ANA ShootEDM Shoot

Goal

Shot on Net

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (ANA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = EDM players, Columns = ANA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

EDM ↓ / ANA →	Granlund	Carlsson	Poehling	Washe	McTavish	Killorn	Gauthier	Viel	Kreider	Sennecke	Terry	LaCombe	Carlson	Trouba	Mintyukov	Moore	Hinds	Helleson
Draisaitl	38	44	62	40	29	50	36	50	43	33	36	25	50	44	64	40	67	25
Nugent-Hopkins	50	27	63	50	40	53	17	33	50	42	33	38	40	50	38	0	64	60
McDavid	43	50	86	33	50	58	40	50	50	40	44	37	73	39	75	33	50	25
Roslovic	86	25	83	0	50	71	30	33	100	75	29	50	60	47	50	0	80	100
Lazar	40	100	0	20	0	43	0	22	0	43	0	20	17	20	20	20	67	100
Savoie	75	25	86	0	50	63	20	25	100	63	29	46	50	44	40	0	71	100
Samanski	67	100	0	10	0	60	0	11	0	60	0	14	20	10	20	10	40	100
Dach	67	100	0	18	0	60	0	22	0	60	0	25	20	20	20	18	50	100
Dickinson	63	20	100	50	67	83	25	100	50	83	22	50	33	50	50	33	100	100
Hyman	54	13	61	50	36	56	29	25	55	42	17	33	38	55	38	0	67	60
Podkolzin	71	25	63	0	50	63	50	0	71	63	33	55	38	63	20	0	56	50
Kapanen	0	44	100	17	50	20	38	40	20	25	33	29	43	35	67	29	20	0
Murphy	38	22	36	0	17	25	27	0	44	33	22	20	20	26	22	0	43	50
Nurse	27	17	36	0	23	22	18	0	33	30	18	26	18	25	14	0	29	50
Bouchard	56	40	88	29	50	68	33	43	29	67	35	46	56	46	62	29	56	50
Walman	60	40	75	25	50	50	33	33	71	50	38	42	38	50	30	25	75	75
Ekholm	67	50	100	25	—	69	44	43	50	73	43	45	63	50	67	40	67	57
Emberson	50	29	71	40	57	43	20	33	71	43	20	45	36	56	20	40	67	50