Edmonton Oilers vs Anaheim Ducks — April 24, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Anaheim Ducks prevailed 7-4 in a high-scoring affair against the Edmonton Oilers on April 24, 2026. At 5-on-5, ANA carried the play with 2.98 expected goals and a 59.0% share of shot attempts. Gauthier was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 0.41 individual expected goals on 4 shots. Shots on goal: ANA 39, EDM 24.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Anaheim Ducks progressed on Apr 24, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

EDM4 - 7ANA

Apr 24, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
ANA	P1	34	15	69.4	28	10	73.7	20	7	74.1	22	11	66.7	6	3	66.7	2.18	0.50	81.4	2	1	66.7
	P2	24	19	55.8	21	16	56.8	11	12	47.8	11	12	47.8	3	3	50.0	1.08	1.12	49.0	1	2	33.3
	P3	17	15	53.1	13	14	48.1	8	6	57.1	10	10	50.0	1	2	33.3	0.88	0.85	50.8	4	1	80.0
	Total	75	49	60.5	62	40	60.8	39	25	60.9	43	33	56.6	10	8	55.6	4.14	2.47	62.6	7	4	63.6
EDM	P1	15	34	30.6	10	28	26.3	7	20	25.9	11	22	33.3	3	6	33.3	0.50	2.18	18.6	1	2	33.3
	P2	19	24	44.2	16	21	43.2	12	11	52.2	12	11	52.2	3	3	50.0	1.12	1.08	51.0	2	1	66.7
	P3	15	17	46.9	14	13	51.9	6	8	42.9	10	10	50.0	2	1	66.7	0.85	0.88	49.2	1	4	20.0
	Total	49	75	39.5	40	62	39.2	25	39	39.1	33	43	43.4	8	10	44.4	2.47	4.14	37.4	4	7	36.4

Win Probability

ANA Favored

EDM Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

ANA

EDM

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

EDM Attempts

ANA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

EDM ShootANA Shoot

Goal

Shot on Net

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (ANA) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = ANA players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the ANA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

ANA ↓ / EDM →	Draisaitl	McDavid	Nugent-Hopkins	Savoie	Roslovic	Samanski	Dach	Lazar	Frederic	Hyman	Kapanen	Podkolzin	Nurse	Murphy	Bouchard	Ekholm	Walman	Emberson
Granlund	48	78	88	81	85	67	100	100	100	75	44	31	60	62	67	71	83	80
Carlsson	57	72	86	63	58	55	20	100	33	78	71	63	64	63	83	79	45	57
Washe	54	50	50	78	55	73	—	—	—	67	38	40	57	60	29	44	83	86
McTavish	80	75	100	46	36	40	75	67	75	75	100	0	63	80	58	56	82	73
Poehling	14	33	29	33	33	33	75	67	75	25	—	0	33	33	29	33	80	70
Killorn	40	61	60	79	75	75	100	100	100	42	40	31	58	60	50	71	83	80
Gauthier	60	73	88	67	58	60	33	100	50	76	65	60	67	65	81	77	50	63
Viel	62	50	50	78	55	75	0	0	0	67	56	55	63	65	33	50	71	75
Kreider	60	63	100	43	36	33	86	78	86	75	100	0	50	60	55	50	89	78
Sennecke	47	79	90	87	85	100	100	100	100	71	40	31	61	65	69	74	80	75
Terry	54	73	86	65	62	50	20	100	33	78	67	50	63	61	83	79	45	57
LaCombe	64	76	88	73	71	77	60	100	60	81	67	50	75	73	79	76	86	75
Trouba	33	64	77	61	60	67	33	100	33	67	62	29	68	65	63	66	83	67
Carlson	47	53	38	65	55	50	0	100	—	50	46	43	45	48	44	60	56	73
Mintyukov	38	39	30	53	45	45	0	—	—	30	42	40	38	37	26	38	59	75
Moore	50	50	50	78	55	73	—	—	—	67	29	33	57	60	29	44	80	83
Hinds	50	67	50	60	60	67	78	67	75	33	100	0	60	67	60	50	88	75
Helleson	67	100	100	67	67	75	78	67	75	75	100	0	60	67	83	75	89	78