Anaheim Ducks vs Edmonton Oilers — April 22, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

A wild one ended 6-4 in favor of the Anaheim Ducks over the Edmonton Oilers on Wednesday. EDM generated 10 high-danger looks compared to just 5 from ANA. Carlsson was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 0.49 individual expected goals on 4 shots. Cutter Gauthier had a 2-goal game. The expected goals were nearly even at 5-on-5 — EDM 2.36, ANA 2.30. Ryan Poehling had a 2-goal game. EDM outshot ANA 37-28.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Anaheim Ducks vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Apr 22, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

ANA6 - 4EDM

Apr 22, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
EDM	P1	23	18	56.1	19	15	55.9	15	10	60.0	17	12	58.6	8	2	80.0	2.03	1.05	66.0	1	1	50.0
	P2	19	26	42.2	12	19	38.7	11	12	47.8	13	15	46.4	2	4	33.3	0.76	1.38	35.5	2	3	40.0
	P3	18	12	60.0	12	9	57.1	11	6	64.7	13	9	59.1	5	2	71.4	0.78	0.83	48.3	1	2	33.3
	Total	60	56	51.7	43	43	50.0	37	28	56.9	43	36	54.4	15	8	65.2	3.57	3.26	52.2	4	6	40.0
ANA	P1	18	23	43.9	15	19	44.1	10	15	40.0	12	17	41.4	2	8	20.0	1.05	2.03	34.0	1	1	50.0
	P2	26	19	57.8	19	12	61.3	12	11	52.2	15	13	53.6	4	2	66.7	1.38	0.76	64.5	3	2	60.0
	P3	12	18	40.0	9	12	42.9	6	11	35.3	9	13	40.9	2	5	28.6	0.83	0.78	51.7	2	1	66.7
	Total	56	60	48.3	43	43	50.0	28	37	43.1	36	43	45.6	8	15	34.8	3.26	3.57	47.8	6	4	60.0

Win Probability

EDM Favored

ANA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

EDM

ANA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

ANA Attempts

EDM Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

ANA ShootEDM Shoot

Goal

Shot on Net

Hit Taken

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (ANA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = EDM players, Columns = ANA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

EDM ↓ / ANA →	Washe	Carlsson	Granlund	Poehling	McTavish	Killorn	Gauthier	Viel	Kreider	Terry	Sennecke	Trouba	LaCombe	Mintyukov	Carlson	Moore	Hinds	Helleson
Draisaitl	75	41	71	50	27	43	45	46	29	56	25	72	47	62	50	50	53	43
McDavid	81	40	59	75	50	36	45	64	43	42	14	72	48	67	44	60	83	100
Savoie	60	40	38	67	75	38	47	56	60	40	50	52	55	46	43	43	50	100
Nugent-Hopkins	75	0	79	63	33	56	20	38	40	0	0	70	33	79	57	50	50	0
Samanski	50	25	36	67	38	31	20	50	25	25	29	42	31	50	36	25	67	67
Frederic	67	57	36	100	100	36	25	80	100	40	42	50	56	50	60	67	43	43
Roslovic	44	50	67	60	50	50	50	44	67	50	50	36	38	56	63	44	67	67
Lazar	67	50	22	50	75	22	0	67	100	0	22	20	20	50	50	67	38	38
Dach	20	100	63	67	67	63	100	38	100	—	57	56	56	67	67	43	43	43
Hyman	77	40	77	75	50	36	37	58	100	43	14	70	50	64	47	55	75	100
Podkolzin	57	47	50	38	27	29	50	42	29	65	29	50	50	45	47	40	46	40
Kapanen	60	57	50	43	33	40	61	38	33	73	40	75	75	47	50	33	50	43
Bouchard	77	41	61	80	50	33	40	62	57	44	18	72	50	73	50	55	63	60
Ekholm	54	45	38	71	36	27	46	50	50	50	30	57	52	47	42	44	75	100
Nurse	14	44	36	67	25	29	33	30	67	43	31	46	38	29	31	33	56	45
Murphy	0	40	38	50	25	38	33	22	25	35	40	38	29	29	31	20	63	50
Walman	65	25	33	25	33	33	50	50	13	45	17	35	33	55	55	45	38	38
Emberson	79	50	40	29	30	29	56	64	17	80	0	50	45	67	60	63	40	36