Vegas Golden Knights vs Utah Mammoth — May 1, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

A lopsided 5-1 result saw the Vegas Golden Knights blow by the Utah Mammoth on Friday. The expected goals were nearly even at 5-on-5 — UTA 2.69, VGK 2.81. Marner put up 2 goals. VGK outshot UTA 26-23.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Vegas Golden Knights vs Utah Mammoth progressed on May 1, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

VGK5 - 1UTA

May 1, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	15	22	40.5	11	16	40.7	6	10	37.5	14	12	53.8	1	4	20.0	1.06	1.22	46.3	0	1	0.0
	P2	19	21	47.5	13	16	44.8	8	10	44.4	11	12	47.8	3	1	75.0	0.86	1.10	44.0	0	1	0.0
	P3	29	13	69.0	22	9	71.0	9	6	60.0	16	10	61.5	1	3	25.0	1.33	0.72	64.9	1	3	25.0
	Total	63	56	52.9	46	41	52.9	23	26	46.9	41	34	54.7	5	8	38.5	3.25	3.04	51.6	1	5	16.7
VGK	P1	22	15	59.5	16	11	59.3	10	6	62.5	12	14	46.2	4	1	80.0	1.22	1.06	53.7	1	0	100.0
	P2	21	19	52.5	16	13	55.2	10	8	55.6	12	11	52.2	1	3	25.0	1.10	0.86	56.0	1	0	100.0
	P3	13	29	31.0	9	22	29.0	6	9	40.0	10	16	38.5	3	1	75.0	0.72	1.33	35.1	3	1	75.0
	Total	56	63	47.1	41	46	47.1	26	23	53.1	34	41	45.3	8	5	61.5	3.04	3.25	48.4	5	1	83.3

Win Probability

UTA Favored

VGK Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

VGK

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

VGK Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

VGK ShootUTA Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit

Hit Taken

Takeaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (VGK) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = VGK players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / VGK →	Sissons	Dowd	Eichel	Howden	Hertl	Barbashev	Marner	Dorofeyev	Smith	Stone	Kolesar	Smith	McNabb	Theodore	Hanifin	Andersson	Lauzon	Korczak
Schmaltz	38	53	43	46	80	42	41	44	36	27	90	80	59	56	38	42	71	50
Cooley	83	100	36	47	0	36	56	40	71	42	73	0	85	76	35	39	56	0
Stenlund	45	29	14	17	46	13	33	11	45	14	60	55	38	22	0	20	67	62
Kerfoot	73	80	80	50	0	75	33	80	78	50	25	25	67	80	64	60	83	56
McBain	25	14	33	50	75	33	67	33	25	50	75	67	43	50	0	33	64	50
Crouse	22	13	31	29	57	27	18	39	22	24	50	100	32	30	33	37	33	67
Carcone	86	93	63	100	0	44	0	50	88	—	20	20	67	50	54	75	86	67
Tanev	13	13	20	50	55	14	33	14	13	50	60	55	25	11	0	25	58	47
Keller	38	53	36	46	75	33	43	38	40	31	82	75	59	56	33	37	71	50
Guenther	83	91	40	47	0	44	53	36	63	38	89	0	85	76	35	39	63	0
Peterka	92	100	100	67	25	100	50	100	94	67	40	40	86	73	89	89	80	78
Yamamoto	100	100	44	44	50	50	44	50	67	44	0	50	71	71	50	46	0	0
Sergachev	64	79	38	37	80	75	41	45	58	26	91	80	67	57	42	38	80	67
Weegar	50	33	44	25	44	36	29	36	50	27	44	50	38	29	29	40	63	55
Schmidt	42	46	42	30	17	35	20	40	38	30	33	40	53	53	23	30	33	29
Marino	46	46	50	30	14	29	33	47	53	44	0	20	50	47	36	39	33	17
Durzi	64	69	44	57	83	60	36	55	67	36	80	86	56	75	61	63	60	60
Cole	54	57	25	100	50	31	17	23	54	20	50	56	40	33	33	44	73	53