Utah Mammoth vs Vegas Golden Knights — April 29, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

Pavel Dorofeyev had a hat trick as the Vegas Golden Knights topped the Utah Mammoth 5-4 on April 29, 2026. UTA won't like the result, but they can take something from the 5-on-5 numbers: 3.37 expected goals to VGK's 2.40. Schmaltz was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 0.66 individual expected goals on 4 shots. Shots on goal: VGK 31, UTA 36.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Vegas Golden Knights progressed on Apr 29, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA4 - 5VGK (SO)

Apr 29, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
VGK	P1	16	20	44.4	11	11	50.0	7	7	50.0	13	13	50.0	4	3	57.1	0.81	0.74	52.0	1	1	50.0
	P2	22	21	51.2	18	16	52.9	9	9	50.0	15	14	51.7	1	4	20.0	1.19	1.27	48.3	2	1	66.7
	P3	15	24	38.5	10	19	34.5	9	10	47.4	9	13	40.9	4	3	57.1	0.70	1.00	41.0	1	2	33.3
	OT	15	13	53.6	11	12	47.8	8	10	44.4	8	7	53.3	2	2	50.0	0.71	0.92	43.7	0	0	—
	SO	5	3	62.5	5	3	62.5	5	2	71.4	4	3	57.1	1	2	33.3	0.38	0.40	48.6	1	0	100.0
	Total	73	81	47.4	55	61	47.4	38	38	50.0	49	50	49.5	12	14	46.2	3.78	4.33	46.6	5	4	55.6
UTA	P1	20	16	55.6	11	11	50.0	7	7	50.0	13	13	50.0	3	4	42.9	0.74	0.81	48.0	1	1	50.0
	P2	21	22	48.8	16	18	47.1	9	9	50.0	14	15	48.3	4	1	80.0	1.27	1.19	51.7	1	2	33.3
	P3	24	15	61.5	19	10	65.5	10	9	52.6	13	9	59.1	3	4	42.9	1.00	0.70	59.0	2	1	66.7
	OT	13	15	46.4	12	11	52.2	10	8	55.6	7	8	46.7	2	2	50.0	0.92	0.71	56.3	0	0	—
	SO	3	5	37.5	3	5	37.5	2	5	28.6	3	4	42.9	2	1	66.7	0.40	0.38	51.4	0	1	0.0
	Total	81	73	52.6	61	55	52.6	38	38	50.0	50	49	50.5	14	12	53.8	4.33	3.78	53.4	4	5	44.4

Win Probability

VGK Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

VGK

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

VGK Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootVGK Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (VGK) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = VGK players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the VGK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

VGK ↓ / UTA →	Schmaltz	Kerfoot	Stenlund	Hayton	Cooley	Crouse	Tanev	Carcone	Keller	Guenther	Peterka	Yamamoto	Marino	Weegar	Schmidt	Cole	Sergachev	Durzi
Eichel	42	65	85	—	—	44	75	—	32	—	—	—	54	50	52	50	83	—
Howden	28	67	100	—	—	32	71	—	25	—	—	—	38	50	29	73	50	—
Dowd	41	33	60	—	—	57	67	—	41	—	—	—	57	43	50	43	36	—
Sissons	47	50	60	—	—	47	50	—	50	—	—	—	67	46	33	55	50	—
Hertl	100	43	65	—	—	71	50	—	33	—	—	—	60	70	50	62	89	—
Barbashev	31	76	67	—	—	24	75	—	24	—	—	—	53	43	50	45	75	—
Stone	45	67	88	—	—	52	50	—	38	—	—	—	47	25	43	65	67	—
Marner	50	82	100	—	—	58	60	—	44	—	—	—	69	27	55	80	67	—
Dorofeyev	73	69	69	—	—	64	57	—	60	—	—	—	67	50	76	44	75	—
Smith	47	20	50	—	—	38	50	—	41	—	—	—	44	36	38	33	56	—
Kolesar	13	50	50	—	—	33	50	—	10	—	—	—	100	67	50	29	33	—
Smith	75	71	67	—	—	75	50	—	71	—	—	—	80	43	69	100	50	—
Theodore	36	65	84	—	—	42	78	—	27	—	—	—	64	53	59	46	67	—
McNabb	32	63	90	—	—	30	100	—	30	—	—	—	64	56	67	25	50	—
Andersson	41	67	50	—	—	43	38	—	38	—	—	—	41	25	32	59	54	—
Hanifin	44	60	50	—	—	48	14	—	36	—	—	—	40	18	38	53	42	—
Lauzon	42	55	29	—	—	55	43	—	42	—	—	—	50	50	25	58	38	—
Korczak	33	59	33	—	—	33	40	—	33	—	—	—	70	42	25	63	0	—