Utah Mammoth vs Vegas Golden Knights — April 21, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Utah Mammoth took down the Vegas Golden Knights 3-2 on Tuesday. A close game in the analytics too — VGK and UTA were nearly dead even in expected goals at 5-on-5 (1.76 vs 1.88). Keep an eye on Hertl — 0.46 individual xG on 1 shots at 5-on-5. VGK held a slight 6-5 edge in high-danger chances. UTA outshot VGK 30-21.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Vegas Golden Knights progressed on Apr 21, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA3 - 2VGK

Apr 21, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
VGK	P1	24	12	66.7	18	8	69.2	10	7	58.8	17	8	68.0	4	1	80.0	1.30	0.57	69.7	1	1	50.0
	P2	8	25	24.2	4	17	19.0	4	13	23.5	7	21	25.0	2	6	25.0	0.36	1.52	19.1	1	1	50.0
	P3	20	21	48.8	12	18	40.0	7	10	41.2	14	15	48.3	4	4	50.0	0.84	1.47	36.4	0	1	0.0
	Total	52	58	47.3	34	43	44.2	21	30	41.2	38	44	46.3	10	11	47.6	2.50	3.56	41.3	2	3	40.0
UTA	P1	12	24	33.3	8	18	30.8	7	10	41.2	8	17	32.0	1	4	20.0	0.57	1.30	30.3	1	1	50.0
	P2	25	8	75.8	17	4	81.0	13	4	76.5	21	7	75.0	6	2	75.0	1.52	0.36	80.9	1	1	50.0
	P3	21	20	51.2	18	12	60.0	10	7	58.8	15	14	51.7	4	4	50.0	1.47	0.84	63.6	1	0	100.0
	Total	58	52	52.7	43	34	55.8	30	21	58.8	44	38	53.7	11	10	52.4	3.56	2.50	58.7	3	2	60.0

Win Probability

VGK Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

VGK

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

VGK Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootVGK Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit

Hit Taken

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (VGK) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = VGK players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the VGK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

VGK ↓ / UTA →	Cooley	Schmaltz	Kerfoot	Stenlund	O'Brien	Crouse	Carcone	Tanev	Guenther	Peterka	Keller	Yamamoto	Sergachev	Weegar	Marino	Schmidt	Durzi	Cole
Eichel	40	65	33	100	100	78	22	67	26	17	45	0	63	39	55	72	50	50
Howden	38	40	20	50	50	0	0	50	38	0	50	20	20	36	57	17	20	100
Hertl	—	60	88	100	100	78	50	100	—	83	50	—	100	100	67	100	33	70
Sissons	46	69	43	80	100	56	18	0	33	11	44	0	62	45	100	0	33	67
Dowd	17	22	33	50	—	67	40	—	10	29	22	0	14	50	75	29	14	50
Barbashev	13	65	46	100	100	60	25	67	20	29	42	0	42	57	53	55	33	40
Marner	54	67	18	93	50	67	13	67	22	22	40	33	73	31	58	73	33	100
Stone	42	75	31	100	100	75	17	100	29	20	56	0	69	44	50	72	50	50
Dorofeyev	40	40	43	88	0	78	40	50	25	33	25	25	82	33	50	67	17	50
Kolesar	0	0	86	100	100	0	50	100	0	75	20	0	43	100	50	50	0	83
Smith	40	67	60	100	100	67	50	100	25	78	67	0	67	89	56	67	0	83
Smith	11	60	50	50	100	60	33	—	17	25	43	0	57	29	100	67	40	60
Theodore	46	65	36	90	67	57	30	50	35	36	38	17	61	48	59	46	40	75
Lauzon	9	11	43	71	91	0	8	71	11	35	20	0	42	47	33	50	14	50
McNabb	35	41	31	100	100	43	29	100	35	23	31	14	41	46	56	42	25	67
Andersson	11	50	29	100	100	64	22	50	8	0	42	0	32	38	63	44	43	100
Hanifin	35	54	20	100	100	67	17	67	14	17	43	0	50	33	80	50	50	100
Korczak	0	0	50	80	100	0	14	80	0	50	0	0	57	73	25	50	17	50