Game Recap
The Vegas Golden Knights came away with a 4-2 victory over the Utah Mammoth on April 19, 2026. VGK had a big edge in high-danger chances, 10-1 over UTA at 5-on-5. The numbers backed up the result — VGK generated 2.66 expected goals to UTA's 2.15 at 5-on-5 (56.4% Corsi). Shots on goal: VGK 31, UTA 33.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Vegas Golden Knights progressed on Apr 19, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
UTA2 - 4VGK
Apr 19, 2026 · Playoffs
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| VGK | P1 | 23 | 18 | 56.1 | 16 | 14 | 53.3 | 9 | 11 | 45.0 | 13 | 11 | 54.2 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 53.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 28 | 18 | 60.9 | 17 | 15 | 53.1 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 17 | 7 | 70.8 | 6 | 0 | 100.0 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 51.5 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 21 | 27 | 43.8 | 17 | 16 | 51.5 | 12 | 11 | 52.2 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 1.30 | 0.82 | 61.5 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 72 | 63 | 53.3 | 50 | 45 | 52.6 | 31 | 33 | 48.4 | 43 | 35 | 55.1 | 12 | 1 | 92.3 | 3.34 | 2.66 | 55.6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
| UTA | P1 | 18 | 23 | 43.9 | 14 | 16 | 46.7 | 11 | 9 | 55.0 | 11 | 13 | 45.8 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.74 | 0.87 | 46.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 18 | 28 | 39.1 | 15 | 17 | 46.9 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 7 | 17 | 29.2 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 1.10 | 1.17 | 48.5 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 27 | 21 | 56.3 | 16 | 17 | 48.5 | 11 | 12 | 47.8 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 0.82 | 1.30 | 38.5 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 63 | 72 | 46.7 | 45 | 50 | 47.4 | 33 | 31 | 51.6 | 35 | 43 | 44.9 | 1 | 12 | 7.7 | 2.66 | 3.34 | 44.4 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
VGK Favored
UTA Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
VGK
UTA
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
UTA Attempts
VGK Attempts
Individual Event Map
UTA ShootVGK Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (VGK) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = VGK players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the VGK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| VGK ↓ / UTA → | Cooley | Schmaltz | Kerfoot | Stenlund | McBain | Crouse | Carcone | Tanev | Guenther | Keller | Yamamoto | Peterka | Sergachev | Schmidt | Weegar | Marino | Cole | Durzi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eichel | 48 | 61 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 68 | 50 | 100 | 47 | 56 | 50 | — | 81 | 57 | 75 | 50 | 57 | 50 |
| Sissons | 45 | 40 | 0 | 8 | 75 | 46 | 0 | 50 | 37 | 33 | 67 | 29 | 39 | 58 | 63 | 55 | 43 | 29 |
| Hertl | 64 | 67 | 71 | 70 | 67 | 75 | 58 | 80 | 57 | 60 | 60 | 69 | 67 | 92 | 20 | 62 | 75 | 64 |
| Howden | 43 | 75 | 33 | 89 | 67 | 100 | 44 | 100 | 33 | 86 | 18 | 50 | 46 | 77 | 22 | 60 | 60 | 50 |
| Dowd | 83 | 50 | 0 | 25 | 100 | 40 | 0 | 50 | 82 | 44 | 90 | 14 | 63 | 60 | 82 | 40 | 40 | 25 |
| Barbashev | 39 | 70 | 56 | 67 | 75 | 58 | 43 | 100 | 35 | 62 | 29 | 60 | 59 | 50 | 36 | 29 | 58 | 40 |
| Stone | 70 | 71 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 65 | 100 | 100 | 76 | 56 | 76 | 0 | 89 | 77 | 77 | 64 | 63 | 67 |
| Marner | 69 | 69 | 50 | 89 | 86 | 81 | 40 | 86 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 33 | 85 | 76 | 73 | 65 | 67 | 43 |
| Smith | 54 | 37 | 20 | 17 | 100 | 58 | 0 | 67 | 52 | 37 | 77 | 25 | 39 | 71 | 83 | 55 | 43 | 33 |
| Kolesar | 19 | 19 | 57 | 15 | 50 | 50 | 53 | 67 | 19 | 15 | 0 | 57 | 16 | 67 | 0 | 50 | 62 | 67 |
| Dorofeyev | 39 | 100 | 56 | 82 | 50 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 20 | 100 | 10 | 57 | 64 | 68 | 17 | 44 | 73 | 50 |
| Smith | 80 | 0 | 65 | 43 | 43 | 60 | 58 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 62 | 50 | 71 | 33 | 50 | 77 | 70 |
| Andersson | 62 | 40 | 53 | 40 | 75 | 69 | 50 | 67 | 61 | 48 | 93 | 46 | 52 | 79 | 74 | 60 | 75 | 60 |
| Hanifin | 90 | 69 | 59 | 79 | 100 | 70 | 60 | 88 | 94 | 68 | 93 | 47 | 78 | 79 | 73 | 63 | 90 | 75 |
| McNabb | 32 | 47 | 63 | 75 | 100 | 55 | 43 | — | 31 | 55 | 25 | 60 | 57 | 43 | 56 | 36 | 30 | 38 |
| Theodore | 33 | 50 | 60 | 86 | 86 | 52 | 67 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 27 | 60 | 62 | 50 | 47 | 42 | 38 | 38 |
| Lauzon | 20 | 14 | 42 | 33 | 55 | 100 | 38 | 60 | 14 | 9 | 40 | 55 | 19 | 100 | 17 | 50 | 53 | 44 |
| Korczak | 33 | — | 50 | 57 | 63 | — | 38 | 67 | 33 | — | 100 | 50 | 40 | 100 | 25 | 20 | 57 | 54 |
