Game Recap
Matt Savoie had a hat trick as the Edmonton Oilers topped the Vancouver Canucks 6-1 on April 16, 2026. EDM generated 16 high-danger looks compared to just 7 from VAN. EDM had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 3.41 xG against 1.44 while holding 69.9% of shot attempts.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Vancouver Canucks vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Apr 16, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
VAN1 - 6EDM
Apr 16, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| EDM | P1 | 29 | 12 | 70.7 | 24 | 8 | 75.0 | 13 | 5 | 72.2 | 17 | 9 | 65.4 | 8 | 4 | 66.7 | 1.87 | 0.74 | 71.6 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 |
| P2 | 23 | 7 | 76.7 | 18 | 5 | 78.3 | 14 | 3 | 82.4 | 16 | 6 | 72.7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | 1.55 | 0.38 | 80.4 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 22 | 10 | 68.8 | 12 | 5 | 70.6 | 8 | 4 | 66.7 | 16 | 7 | 69.6 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 1.07 | 0.60 | 64.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 74 | 29 | 71.8 | 54 | 18 | 75.0 | 35 | 12 | 74.5 | 49 | 22 | 69.0 | 20 | 7 | 74.1 | 4.48 | 1.72 | 72.2 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | |
| VAN | P1 | 12 | 29 | 29.3 | 8 | 24 | 25.0 | 5 | 13 | 27.8 | 9 | 17 | 34.6 | 4 | 8 | 33.3 | 0.74 | 1.87 | 28.4 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 |
| P2 | 7 | 23 | 23.3 | 5 | 18 | 21.7 | 3 | 14 | 17.6 | 6 | 16 | 27.3 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 0.38 | 1.55 | 19.6 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 10 | 22 | 31.3 | 5 | 12 | 29.4 | 4 | 8 | 33.3 | 7 | 16 | 30.4 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 0.60 | 1.07 | 36.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 29 | 74 | 28.2 | 18 | 54 | 25.0 | 12 | 35 | 25.5 | 22 | 49 | 31.0 | 7 | 20 | 25.9 | 1.72 | 4.48 | 27.8 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | |
Win Probability
EDM Favored
VAN Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
EDM
VAN
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
VAN Attempts
EDM Attempts
Individual Event Map
VAN ShootEDM Shoot
Shot on Net
Hit
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (VAN) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = EDM players, Columns = VAN players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| EDM ↓ / VAN → | Blueger | Pettersson | Räty | Karlsson | Rossi | Mueller | Douglas | Ohgren | DeBrusk | Hoglander | O'Connor | Boeser | Hronek | Pettersson | Buium | Kudryavtsev | Willander | Pettersson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDavid | 75 | 75 | 60 | 71 | 75 | 33 | 0 | 57 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 57 | 81 | 71 | 90 | 100 | 60 | 75 |
| Nugent-Hopkins | 92 | 85 | 100 | 83 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 91 | 88 | 0 | — | 88 | 93 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 86 | 86 |
| Roslovic | 89 | 88 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 88 | 86 | 100 | 100 | 89 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 88 | 80 |
| Savoie | 67 | 63 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 78 | 67 | 83 | 100 | 75 | 80 | 69 | 86 | 100 | 67 | 100 |
| Henrique | 63 | 100 | 20 | 80 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 38 | 83 | 50 | 83 | 50 | 50 |
| Lazar | 71 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 50 | 83 | 75 | 83 | 100 | 67 |
| Dach | 50 | 100 | 50 | 91 | 86 | 67 | 100 | 60 | 100 | 67 | 92 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 86 | 82 | 67 | 70 |
| Frederic | 100 | — | 100 | 90 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | — | 57 | 86 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 83 | 73 | 100 | 88 |
| Samanski | 100 | 33 | 100 | 82 | 72 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 33 | 50 | 86 | 50 | 63 | 100 | 71 | 73 | 67 | 88 |
| Hyman | 78 | 79 | 67 | 71 | 100 | 33 | 0 | 73 | 77 | 86 | 100 | 80 | 89 | 79 | 89 | 100 | 60 | 75 |
| Podkolzin | 92 | 92 | 100 | 83 | — | 100 | 100 | 91 | 89 | 100 | — | 93 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 86 | 86 |
| Kapanen | 71 | 67 | 25 | 80 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 57 | 71 | 33 | 50 | 63 | 42 | 100 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 50 |
| Bouchard | 80 | 71 | 80 | 56 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 70 | 69 | 67 | 100 | 82 | 89 | 79 | 75 | 67 | 50 | 100 |
| Nurse | 75 | 83 | 33 | 100 | 43 | 40 | 33 | 67 | 85 | 67 | 33 | 67 | 46 | 100 | 83 | 77 | 75 | 56 |
| Ekholm | 60 | 45 | 33 | 44 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 56 | 45 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 57 | 60 | 45 | 50 |
| Emberson | 78 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 91 | 50 | 50 | 71 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 70 | 78 | 75 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 88 |
| Walman | 80 | 75 | 50 | 90 | 85 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 71 | 100 | 70 | 78 | 80 | 90 | 83 | 100 | 88 |
| Murphy | 75 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 71 | 100 | 60 | 33 | 83 | 44 | 100 | 80 | 75 | 100 | 63 |
