St. Louis Blues vs Utah Mammoth — April 16, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The St. Louis Blues prevailed 5-3 in a high-scoring affair against the Utah Mammoth on April 16, 2026. Thomas put up 2 goals. UTA held a slight 8-5 edge in high-danger chances. The underlying numbers told a different story — UTA actually held the xG edge (3.04 to 2.36) at 5-on-5, but it didn't matter on the scoreboard.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as St. Louis Blues vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Apr 16, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

STL5 - 3UTA

Apr 16, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	17	17	50.0	15	12	55.6	9	11	45.0	11	11	50.0	1	1	50.0	1.03	1.03	50.0	1	1	50.0
	P2	29	14	67.4	22	11	66.7	11	7	61.1	18	9	66.7	4	3	57.1	1.64	0.79	67.5	2	2	50.0
	P3	14	21	40.0	6	17	26.1	3	11	21.4	13	11	54.2	6	2	75.0	0.58	0.92	38.4	0	2	0.0
	Total	60	52	53.6	43	40	51.8	23	29	44.2	42	31	57.5	11	6	64.7	3.25	2.74	54.2	3	5	37.5
STL	P1	17	17	50.0	12	15	44.4	11	9	55.0	11	11	50.0	1	1	50.0	1.03	1.03	50.0	1	1	50.0
	P2	14	29	32.6	11	22	33.3	7	11	38.9	9	18	33.3	3	4	42.9	0.79	1.64	32.5	2	2	50.0
	P3	21	14	60.0	17	6	73.9	11	3	78.6	11	13	45.8	2	6	25.0	0.92	0.58	61.6	2	0	100.0
	Total	52	60	46.4	40	43	48.2	29	23	55.8	31	42	42.5	6	11	35.3	2.74	3.25	45.8	5	3	62.5

Win Probability

UTA Favored

STL Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

STL

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

STL Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

STL ShootUTA Shoot

Missed Shot

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Shot Blocked

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (STL) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = STL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / STL →	Thomas	Finley	Suter	Holloway	Walker	Neighbours	Buchnevich	Toropchenko	Snuggerud	Berggren	Dvorsky	Kyrou	Mailloux	Broberg	Fowler	Parayko	Tucker	Holl
Schmaltz	29	33	38	44	33	50	44	33	17	60	56	29	53	44	50	43	40	25
Kerfoot	64	100	67	64	100	71	50	100	64	67	67	60	75	64	83	75	64	67
Stenlund	100	25	67	88	38	0	50	29	100	0	0	50	50	50	55	60	67	75
Cooley	63	33	20	56	50	29	25	50	56	29	33	25	63	55	38	33	0	0
O'Brien	100	29	100	86	29	0	100	29	100	0	0	100	67	67	56	56	67	67
Carcone	80	88	73	80	89	46	71	88	78	42	38	86	69	63	63	67	75	69
Crouse	20	30	29	17	33	40	29	33	17	44	44	29	33	36	43	43	22	22
Tanev	100	25	100	83	29	0	50	29	100	0	0	50	50	67	50	56	50	50
Keller	43	44	40	56	44	73	45	44	33	73	70	33	65	56	58	56	40	25
Peterka	76	88	77	76	89	88	60	88	75	75	75	70	80	75	100	88	67	71
Yamamoto	63	33	29	56	50	29	33	50	56	29	33	33	56	50	44	43	0	0
Weegar	75	50	58	75	50	53	50	50	73	53	50	57	52	50	75	67	75	67
Sergachev	73	50	67	77	50	53	63	50	70	57	45	50	52	50	78	71	78	71
Marino	75	83	64	79	83	67	62	83	75	75	75	58	91	80	75	71	69	67
Cole	60	44	0	43	56	0	0	50	40	0	0	0	83	67	22	25	0	20
DeSimone	43	25	0	33	36	0	0	30	29	0	0	0	63	67	11	13	0	13
Schmidt	80	83	75	80	83	60	63	83	80	67	67	67	89	73	73	75	83	100
Simashev	50	0	22	50	20	33	22	0	40	25	50	25	29	14	25	33	27	31