Anaheim Ducks vs Nashville Predators — April 16, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Anaheim Ducks prevailed 5-4 in a high-scoring affair against the Nashville Predators on April 16, 2026. ANA held a slight 9-7 edge in high-danger chances. Forsberg put up 2 goals. Steven Stamkos had a 2-goal game. At 5-on-5, ANA carried the play with 2.78 expected goals and a 64.8% share of shot attempts.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Anaheim Ducks vs Nashville Predators progressed on Apr 16, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

ANA5 - 4NSH

Apr 16, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
NSH	P1	17	20	45.9	13	14	48.1	9	10	47.4	11	13	45.8	4	2	66.7	0.86	0.92	48.4	2	2	50.0
	P2	15	27	35.7	11	22	33.3	8	14	36.4	12	14	46.2	3	2	60.0	1.01	1.17	46.3	2	1	66.7
	P3	10	33	23.3	6	26	18.8	4	16	20.0	7	22	24.1	2	9	18.2	0.42	2.63	13.9	0	2	0.0
	Total	42	80	34.4	30	62	32.6	21	40	34.4	30	49	38.0	9	13	40.9	2.30	4.72	32.7	4	5	44.4
ANA	P1	20	17	54.1	14	13	51.9	10	9	52.6	13	11	54.2	2	4	33.3	0.92	0.86	51.6	2	2	50.0
	P2	27	15	64.3	22	11	66.7	14	8	63.6	14	12	53.8	2	3	40.0	1.17	1.01	53.7	1	2	33.3
	P3	33	10	76.7	26	6	81.3	16	4	80.0	22	7	75.9	9	2	81.8	2.63	0.42	86.1	2	0	100.0
	Total	80	42	65.6	62	30	67.4	40	21	65.6	49	30	62.0	13	9	59.1	4.72	2.30	67.3	5	4	55.6

Win Probability

NSH Favored

ANA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

NSH

ANA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

ANA Attempts

NSH Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

ANA ShootNSH Shoot

Attempt Blocked

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Takeaway

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NSH) performed against every skater on the away team (ANA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = NSH players, Columns = ANA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the NSH player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

NSH ↓ / ANA →	McTavish	Poehling	Carlsson	Granlund	Washe	Gauthier	Killorn	Kreider	Viel	Terry	Sennecke	Trouba	LaCombe	Hinds	Carlson	Mintyukov	Luneau	Moore
O'Reilly	13	55	24	67	100	13	58	22	100	24	80	53	20	75	40	64	67	100
Stamkos	25	75	25	100	80	25	100	25	100	25	100	50	30	56	50	58	50	100
Svechkov	33	42	31	25	25	33	31	40	33	50	0	47	33	40	29	38	33	0
Jost	7	8	18	22	60	7	22	14	50	25	67	20	13	25	40	75	25	60
Wiesblatt	8	10	40	29	60	8	40	40	25	40	67	11	18	25	67	75	25	60
Forsberg	67	82	50	75	83	67	77	60	50	60	83	93	71	60	88	91	17	75
L'Heureux	29	45	22	17	25	29	20	20	13	29	20	30	13	50	24	38	50	0
Schaefer	0	0	25	67	60	0	67	25	50	25	67	17	17	25	67	67	25	60
Kemell	36	42	33	50	25	36	40	40	36	33	20	46	45	45	36	33	40	0
Evangelista	50	73	75	60	71	50	70	60	0	60	83	92	67	55	86	82	17	75
O'Hara	33	40	21	100	100	33	75	21	50	21	100	27	22	60	43	44	60	100
Wood	50	43	0	50	60	50	50	0	0	0	83	57	0	43	71	63	0	75
Ufko	8	33	50	50	50	8	60	56	20	56	40	50	25	29	71	78	19	33
Gravel	8	8	30	25	33	8	33	38	20	33	33	20	18	13	57	60	13	33
Barron	36	40	17	45	71	36	43	20	25	17	64	40	18	56	50	50	50	83
Wilsby	31	46	18	50	71	31	43	15	33	15	69	46	18	53	45	55	47	83
Perbix	31	50	23	29	50	31	33	19	38	30	100	50	24	100	37	55	—	0
Skjei	25	36	23	29	50	25	33	18	33	25	100	40	23	100	33	50	—	0