Utah Mammoth vs Calgary Flames — April 12, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Utah Mammoth fell to the Calgary Flames 4-1 on Sunday. High-danger chances at 5-on-5: CGY 13, UTA 10. CGY had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 2.48 xG against 2.13 while holding 42.2% of shot attempts. Shots on goal: CGY 23, UTA 29.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Calgary Flames progressed on Apr 12, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA1 - 4CGY

Apr 12, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
CGY	P1	29	9	76.3	21	7	75.0	14	4	77.8	20	6	76.9	13	4	76.5	2.51	0.60	80.6	2	0	100.0
	P2	7	28	20.0	5	19	20.8	3	11	21.4	4	18	18.2	1	4	20.0	0.39	1.14	25.3	0	0	—
	P3	11	27	28.9	8	21	27.6	6	14	30.0	10	16	38.5	5	4	55.6	0.93	1.26	42.5	2	1	66.7
	Total	47	64	42.3	34	47	42.0	23	29	44.2	34	40	45.9	19	12	61.3	3.83	3.01	56.0	4	1	80.0
UTA	P1	9	29	23.7	7	21	25.0	4	14	22.2	6	20	23.1	4	13	23.5	0.60	2.51	19.4	0	2	0.0
	P2	28	7	80.0	19	5	79.2	11	3	78.6	18	4	81.8	4	1	80.0	1.14	0.39	74.7	0	0	—
	P3	27	11	71.1	21	8	72.4	14	6	70.0	16	10	61.5	4	5	44.4	1.26	0.93	57.5	1	2	33.3
	Total	64	47	57.7	47	34	58.0	29	23	55.8	40	34	54.1	12	19	38.7	3.01	3.83	44.0	1	4	20.0

Win Probability

CGY Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

CGY

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

CGY Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootCGY Shoot

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CGY) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = CGY players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the CGY player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

CGY ↓ / UTA →	Schmaltz	Stenlund	Kerfoot	Cooley	O'Brien	Crouse	Carcone	Tanev	Keller	Peterka	Guenther	Yamamoto	Sergachev	Cole	Schmidt	Weegar	Durzi	Simashev
Backlund	32	83	13	14	67	47	13	67	32	13	14	50	29	50	71	18	27	67
Frost	80	80	79	100	67	80	73	67	50	73	100	100	69	73	92	83	63	89
Strome	100	25	0	38	0	100	0	0	67	0	45	42	50	33	57	50	11	33
Zary	100	22	0	55	0	100	0	0	67	—	50	60	50	40	63	50	14	43
Sharangovich	0	100	33	50	100	0	29	—	33	30	50	100	50	50	50	43	67	50
Gross	25	50	50	50	50	—	50	0	33	60	43	100	43	50	50	75	67	50
Coleman	41	86	50	14	67	56	20	67	32	20	14	50	33	60	80	42	30	67
Olofsson	80	80	79	63	67	80	73	67	50	62	83	63	69	57	91	83	45	88
Farabee	35	75	0	25	67	43	0	67	37	0	25	50	21	60	71	20	38	67
Suniev	—	100	30	67	50	100	25	—	50	33	50	100	67	43	50	60	33	50
Coronato	80	82	75	50	71	67	69	67	50	60	100	50	60	64	92	70	55	89
Klapka	100	0	—	64	0	100	—	0	67	—	64	64	71	25	57	73	14	33
Parekh	50	88	59	71	60	50	50	75	36	44	83	77	55	53	87	65	31	78
Määttä	40	29	36	23	17	55	36	0	40	36	21	33	31	40	45	20	33	50
Whitecloud	29	75	50	50	60	50	50	75	31	44	55	77	35	45	83	63	40	80
Brzustewicz	29	50	25	20	25	44	25	0	33	25	17	33	43	30	80	13	13	67
Pachal	25	40	67	20	33	75	67	33	22	67	20	40	30	43	38	33	44	44
Wiebe	0	43	100	0	43	0	100	43	0	100	0	0	0	20	100	33	20	67