Game Recap
The Los Angeles Kings shut out the Edmonton Oilers 1-0 on April 11, 2026. Despite the result, the Edmonton Oilers held the edge in expected goals (2.77 to 1.56) at 5-on-5, indicating the Los Angeles Kings received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Edmonton Oilers created 10 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the Los Angeles Kings at 5-on-5. Matt Savoie was the most dangerous skater with 0.60 individual expected goals on 3 shots at 5-on-5. The Edmonton Oilers outshot the Los Angeles Kings 27-20 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Los Angeles Kings progressed on Apr 11, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
EDM0 - 1LAK
Apr 11, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| LAK | P1 | 18 | 21 | 46.2 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 13 | 11 | 54.2 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 0.84 | 1.12 | 42.7 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 15 | 19 | 44.1 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 6 | 7 | 46.2 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 52.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 17 | 24 | 41.5 | 11 | 18 | 37.9 | 6 | 11 | 35.3 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 0.87 | 1.30 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| Total | 50 | 64 | 43.9 | 33 | 42 | 44.0 | 21 | 27 | 43.8 | 36 | 39 | 48.0 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 2.44 | 3.09 | 44.1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| EDM | P1 | 21 | 18 | 53.8 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 11 | 13 | 45.8 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 1.12 | 0.84 | 57.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 19 | 15 | 55.9 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 7 | 6 | 53.8 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 47.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 24 | 17 | 58.5 | 18 | 11 | 62.1 | 11 | 6 | 64.7 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 1.30 | 0.87 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| Total | 64 | 50 | 56.1 | 42 | 33 | 56.0 | 27 | 21 | 56.3 | 39 | 36 | 52.0 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 3.09 | 2.44 | 55.9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
Win Probability
LAK Favored
EDM Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
LAK
EDM
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
EDM Attempts
LAK Attempts
Individual Event Map
EDM ShootLAK Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (LAK) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = LAK players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the LAK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| LAK ↓ / EDM → | McDavid | Roslovic | Nugent-Hopkins | Henrique | Savoie | Frederic | Dach | Lazar | Samanski | Jones | Kapanen | Podkolzin | Murphy | Nurse | Bouchard | Ekholm | Walman | Emberson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kopitar | 38 | 42 | 60 | 44 | 100 | 45 | 56 | 29 | 100 | 75 | 86 | 50 | 63 | 63 | 50 | 57 | 33 | 33 |
| Laughton | 17 | 27 | 57 | 33 | 20 | 20 | 33 | 27 | 33 | 100 | 67 | 25 | 43 | 40 | 14 | 20 | 33 | 50 |
| Helenius | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Panarin | 38 | 30 | 52 | 40 | 67 | 38 | 56 | 17 | 100 | 75 | 80 | 25 | 56 | 54 | 38 | 50 | 33 | 33 |
| Moore | 36 | 50 | 20 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 50 | — | 36 | 43 | 33 | 25 | 40 | 53 | 0 | 0 |
| Byfield | 31 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 38 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 45 | 13 | 0 |
| Laferriere | 31 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 20 | 33 | 0 | 50 | — | 33 | 45 | 20 | 17 | 32 | 44 | 0 | 0 |
| Kempe | 43 | 30 | 73 | 46 | 100 | 80 | 80 | 25 | 100 | 75 | 92 | 50 | 76 | 76 | 50 | 60 | 33 | 33 |
| Armia | 40 | 25 | 67 | 30 | 67 | 50 | 25 | 33 | 33 | 100 | 83 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 43 | 50 |
| Wright | 33 | 27 | 50 | 30 | 33 | 20 | 25 | 33 | 33 | 100 | 75 | 20 | 36 | 36 | 50 | 33 | 29 | 40 |
| Ward | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joseph | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Clarke | 33 | 28 | 67 | 33 | 75 | 44 | 57 | 20 | 100 | 75 | 85 | 25 | 52 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 33 | 33 |
| Edmundson | 18 | 21 | 59 | 29 | 50 | 44 | 57 | 11 | 100 | 75 | 83 | 14 | 48 | 46 | 27 | 43 | 33 | 33 |
| Anderson | 37 | 43 | 29 | 75 | 54 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 0 | — | 44 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 39 | 48 | 11 | 0 |
| Doughty | 34 | 43 | 29 | 75 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0 | — | 40 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 34 | 43 | 0 | 0 |
| Ceci | 22 | 14 | 38 | 17 | 20 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 83 | 14 | 42 | 38 | 22 | 29 | 33 | 40 |
| Dumoulin | 20 | 20 | 40 | 17 | 25 | 33 | 22 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 83 | 25 | 38 | 36 | 40 | 25 | 43 | 40 |
