Game Recap
Behind a 3-goal night from Connor McDavid, the Edmonton Oilers beat the San Jose Sharks 5-2 on Wednesday. Sherwood was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 0.54 individual expected goals on 2 shots. EDM had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 2.20 xG against 1.78 while holding 57.3% of shot attempts. EDM outshot SJS 26-14.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs San Jose Sharks progressed on Apr 8, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
EDM5 - 2SJS
Apr 8, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| SJS | P1 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 3 | 8 | 27.3 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 48.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 |
| P2 | 14 | 27 | 34.1 | 10 | 19 | 34.5 | 7 | 11 | 38.9 | 10 | 21 | 32.3 | 5 | 5 | 50.0 | 0.94 | 1.57 | 37.5 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 16 | 50.0 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 4 | 7 | 36.4 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 53.0 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| Total | 41 | 58 | 41.4 | 28 | 41 | 40.6 | 14 | 26 | 35.0 | 28 | 40 | 41.2 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 2.30 | 2.93 | 44.0 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | |
| EDM | P1 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 8 | 3 | 72.7 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 51.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
| P2 | 27 | 14 | 65.9 | 19 | 10 | 65.5 | 11 | 7 | 61.1 | 21 | 10 | 67.7 | 5 | 5 | 50.0 | 1.57 | 0.94 | 62.5 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 16 | 50.0 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 7 | 4 | 63.6 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 47.0 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| Total | 58 | 41 | 58.6 | 41 | 28 | 59.4 | 26 | 14 | 65.0 | 40 | 28 | 58.8 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 2.93 | 2.30 | 56.0 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | |
Win Probability
SJS Favored
EDM Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
SJS
EDM
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
EDM Attempts
SJS Attempts
Individual Event Map
EDM ShootSJS Shoot
Missed Shot
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (SJS) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = SJS players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the SJS player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| SJS ↓ / EDM → | McDavid | Nugent-Hopkins | Roslovic | Frederic | Savoie | Henrique | Dickinson | Dach | Samanski | Jones | Kapanen | Podkolzin | Nurse | Murphy | Walman | Bouchard | Emberson | Ekholm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celebrini | 46 | 39 | 44 | 25 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 22 | 44 | 40 | 59 | 18 | 48 | 48 | 47 | 33 | 43 | 33 |
| Smith | 45 | 41 | 38 | 33 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 40 | 60 | 18 | 50 | 47 | 60 | 38 | 56 | 33 |
| Wennberg | 38 | 46 | 25 | 50 | 58 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 67 | 57 | 60 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 82 | 33 | 71 | 57 |
| Toffoli | 0 | 57 | 29 | 40 | 43 | 50 | 75 | 40 | 38 | 40 | 78 | 0 | 61 | 59 | 43 | 0 | 43 | 0 |
| Ostapchuk | 0 | 0 | 29 | 25 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 20 | 33 | 13 | 20 | 25 | 14 | 14 | 40 | 11 | 33 | 17 |
| Goodrow | 0 | 0 | 29 | 14 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 13 | 17 | 13 | 20 | 25 | 14 | 14 | 25 | 11 | 22 | 17 |
| Misa | 0 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 40 | 40 | 78 | 0 | 69 | 67 | 40 | 0 | 40 | 0 |
| Sherwood | 44 | 60 | 71 | 100 | 44 | 40 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 56 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 80 | 42 | 67 | 50 |
| Eklund | 54 | 63 | 83 | 50 | 57 | 67 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 80 | 67 | 57 | 45 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 67 |
| Chernyshov | 0 | 44 | 25 | 40 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 43 | 40 | 67 | 0 | 55 | 50 | 43 | 0 | 43 | 0 |
| Graf | 33 | 30 | 25 | 33 | 33 | 29 | 40 | 33 | 100 | 29 | 42 | 13 | 33 | 25 | 45 | 32 | 40 | 36 |
| Gaudette | 0 | 0 | 40 | 17 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 14 | 17 | 13 | 20 | 50 | 17 | 17 | 25 | 20 | 22 | 25 |
| Ferraro | 18 | 39 | 40 | 22 | 22 | 50 | 57 | 25 | 43 | 57 | 71 | 19 | 44 | 40 | 69 | 19 | 67 | 14 |
| Orlov | 50 | 40 | 40 | 75 | 62 | 56 | 56 | 67 | 100 | 33 | 56 | 50 | 50 | 55 | 88 | 36 | 80 | 56 |
| Leddy | 21 | 35 | 24 | 13 | 10 | 27 | 45 | 13 | 22 | 25 | 47 | 7 | 35 | 35 | 27 | 21 | 20 | 25 |
| Desharnais | 47 | 29 | 50 | 33 | 60 | 33 | 60 | 0 | — | — | 57 | 42 | 43 | 60 | 80 | 36 | 50 | 60 |
| Klingberg | 17 | 55 | 56 | 38 | 25 | 75 | 25 | 43 | 50 | 67 | 60 | 33 | 45 | 33 | 71 | 33 | 69 | 0 |
| Dickinson | 33 | 41 | 25 | 0 | 14 | 25 | 40 | 0 | 13 | 21 | 44 | 11 | 40 | 40 | 15 | 31 | 8 | 30 |
