Nashville Predators vs Anaheim Ducks — April 7, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

A 5-0 shutout for the Nashville Predators over the Anaheim Ducks on Tuesday. Keep an eye on Terry — 0.78 individual xG on 7 shots at 5-on-5. High-danger chances at 5-on-5: NSH 10, ANA 9. ANA won't like the result, but they can take something from the 5-on-5 numbers: 4.35 expected goals to NSH's 2.11. Shots on goal: ANA 43, NSH 25.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Nashville Predators vs Anaheim Ducks progressed on Apr 7, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

NSH5 - 0ANA

Apr 7, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
ANA	P1	24	14	63.2	18	11	62.1	12	5	70.6	16	9	64.0	5	3	62.5	1.42	0.69	67.2	0	0	—
	P2	31	24	56.4	21	17	55.3	14	14	50.0	22	19	53.7	2	5	28.6	1.66	1.52	52.2	0	3	0.0
	P3	29	9	76.3	25	9	73.5	17	6	73.9	22	8	73.3	8	2	80.0	2.24	0.67	77.1	0	2	0.0
	Total	84	47	64.1	64	37	63.4	43	25	63.2	60	36	62.5	15	10	60.0	5.32	2.88	64.9	0	5	0.0
NSH	P1	14	24	36.8	11	18	37.9	5	12	29.4	9	16	36.0	3	5	37.5	0.69	1.42	32.8	0	0	—
	P2	24	31	43.6	17	21	44.7	14	14	50.0	19	22	46.3	5	2	71.4	1.52	1.66	47.8	3	0	100.0
	P3	9	29	23.7	9	25	26.5	6	17	26.1	8	22	26.7	2	8	20.0	0.67	2.24	22.9	2	0	100.0
	Total	47	84	35.9	37	64	36.6	25	43	36.8	36	60	37.5	10	15	40.0	2.88	5.32	35.1	5	0	100.0

Win Probability

ANA Favored

NSH Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

ANA

NSH

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

NSH Attempts

ANA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

NSH ShootANA Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (ANA) performed against every skater on the away team (NSH) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = ANA players, Columns = NSH players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the ANA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

ANA ↓ / NSH →	O'Reilly	Jost	Stamkos	Svechkov	Forsberg	L'Heureux	Haula	Schaefer	Marchessault	Kemell	Wood	Evangelista	Perbix	Skjei	Wilsby	Barron	Josi	Ufko
Carlsson	53	31	40	38	67	75	73	33	78	50	86	78	72	67	67	54	56	50
Poehling	38	25	0	100	45	50	50	100	46	71	50	75	47	50	57	60	54	57
Granlund	57	47	50	63	50	71	67	60	33	43	100	90	75	61	83	64	58	33
Washe	0	40	0	57	38	78	71	63	50	64	50	50	59	67	63	63	0	60
McTavish	33	60	0	100	67	57	54	100	67	73	67	—	45	54	78	63	50	78
Kreider	78	50	0	100	54	82	82	100	59	80	47	33	59	82	63	60	90	54
Killorn	40	71	36	100	25	45	45	100	0	67	50	100	45	45	83	73	14	71
Viel	0	70	0	78	88	79	79	100	88	73	100	—	82	89	77	73	50	89
Terry	78	60	0	63	53	80	80	83	59	63	52	50	63	85	64	59	90	50
Sennecke	52	42	50	57	67	40	25	50	50	40	100	100	56	48	75	63	47	33
Carlson	59	50	43	46	45	60	63	67	45	44	33	67	48	56	61	57	57	50
Mintyukov	25	20	8	57	46	67	69	50	46	60	45	60	57	60	50	50	31	57
LaCombe	61	54	57	86	50	69	58	100	63	67	67	88	59	55	79	79	64	75
Trouba	21	33	20	83	40	78	80	80	47	78	78	78	80	58	80	80	33	100
Hinds	33	57	25	60	54	67	67	75	58	75	70	60	55	78	83	83	40	63
Helleson	100	57	50	70	70	82	75	80	78	89	78	67	68	100	80	80	67	64
Moore	0	0	0	55	60	83	83	57	75	78	100	50	70	67	71	63	0	60
Zellweger	0	50	0	62	50	88	75	63	100	70	100	50	73	50	71	63	0	75