Game Recap
The Utah Mammoth defeated the Edmonton Oilers 6-5 in overtime on April 7, 2026. The Utah Mammoth controlled play with 63.1% Corsi and generated 3.43 expected goals compared to 2.18 from the Edmonton Oilers at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Utah Mammoth created 17 high-danger scoring chances compared to 8 from the Edmonton Oilers at 5-on-5. Nick Schmaltz scored 2 goals. The Utah Mammoth outshot the Edmonton Oilers 31-26 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Apr 7, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
EDM5 - 6UTA (OT)
Apr 7, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| UTA | P1 | 27 | 12 | 69.2 | 24 | 10 | 70.6 | 11 | 7 | 61.1 | 20 | 6 | 76.9 | 8 | 4 | 66.7 | 1.71 | 0.92 | 65.0 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 23 | 42.5 | 16 | 18 | 47.1 | 10 | 12 | 45.5 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 1.19 | 1.07 | 52.7 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| P3 | 36 | 10 | 78.3 | 23 | 9 | 71.9 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 26 | 8 | 76.5 | 8 | 1 | 88.9 | 1.32 | 0.61 | 68.4 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.06 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 81 | 45 | 64.3 | 64 | 37 | 63.4 | 31 | 26 | 54.4 | 60 | 27 | 69.0 | 17 | 9 | 65.4 | 4.28 | 2.60 | 62.2 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | |
| EDM | P1 | 12 | 27 | 30.8 | 10 | 24 | 29.4 | 7 | 11 | 38.9 | 6 | 20 | 23.1 | 4 | 8 | 33.3 | 0.92 | 1.71 | 35.0 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 |
| P2 | 23 | 17 | 57.5 | 18 | 16 | 52.9 | 12 | 10 | 54.5 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 1.07 | 1.19 | 47.3 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| P3 | 10 | 36 | 21.7 | 9 | 23 | 28.1 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 8 | 26 | 23.5 | 1 | 8 | 11.1 | 0.61 | 1.32 | 31.6 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 45 | 81 | 35.7 | 37 | 64 | 36.6 | 26 | 31 | 45.6 | 27 | 60 | 31.0 | 9 | 17 | 34.6 | 2.60 | 4.28 | 37.8 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | |
Win Probability
UTA Favored
EDM Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
UTA
EDM
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
EDM Attempts
UTA Attempts
Individual Event Map
EDM ShootUTA Shoot
Shot on Net
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = UTA players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| UTA ↓ / EDM → | McDavid | Savoie | Nugent-Hopkins | Roslovic | Dickinson | Frederic | Dach | Henrique | Lazar | Jones | Podkolzin | Kapanen | Murphy | Nurse | Bouchard | Ekholm | Walman | Emberson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmaltz | 60 | 71 | 75 | 83 | 86 | 33 | 25 | 89 | 88 | 90 | 60 | 89 | 73 | 71 | 70 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
| Cooley | 54 | 46 | 67 | 60 | 63 | 55 | 45 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 58 | 71 | 50 | 45 | 67 | 62 | 82 | 75 |
| Stenlund | 20 | 0 | 58 | 58 | 25 | 29 | 25 | 59 | 58 | 58 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 47 | 57 |
| Kerfoot | 60 | 50 | 82 | 87 | 29 | 29 | 23 | 82 | 78 | 71 | 100 | 93 | 63 | 61 | 43 | 43 | 80 | 92 |
| Crouse | 59 | 71 | 75 | 71 | 50 | 33 | 29 | 80 | 88 | 90 | 61 | 75 | 64 | 62 | 68 | 70 | 63 | 86 |
| Carcone | 50 | 50 | 82 | 88 | 27 | 29 | 21 | 70 | 67 | 63 | — | 80 | 53 | 53 | 40 | 33 | 67 | 82 |
| Tanev | 0 | 0 | 89 | 100 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 0 | 89 | 55 | 55 | 33 | 40 | 77 | 85 |
| Keller | 58 | 71 | 91 | 100 | 78 | 38 | 33 | 80 | 80 | 83 | 57 | 92 | 74 | 72 | 68 | 68 | 89 | 88 |
| Yamamoto | 62 | 50 | 80 | 78 | 50 | 54 | 46 | 67 | 70 | 67 | 58 | 75 | 54 | 48 | 64 | 54 | 82 | 83 |
| Guenther | 67 | 58 | 64 | 67 | 60 | 50 | 40 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 58 | 68 | 55 | 48 | 80 | 73 | 75 | 70 |
| Peterka | 33 | 67 | 86 | 91 | 28 | 29 | 24 | 80 | 78 | 71 | 0 | 83 | 58 | 58 | 40 | 33 | 71 | 79 |
| Sergachev | 56 | 59 | 75 | 57 | 56 | 14 | 0 | 63 | 75 | 80 | 61 | 83 | 53 | 47 | 69 | 70 | 25 | 50 |
| Weegar | 60 | 68 | 100 | 100 | 22 | 18 | 10 | 67 | 67 | 80 | 55 | 0 | 23 | 15 | 70 | 68 | 60 | 80 |
| Cole | 60 | 33 | 78 | 83 | 25 | 29 | 25 | 74 | 80 | 79 | 67 | 76 | 74 | 69 | 50 | 45 | 75 | 86 |
| Schmidt | 33 | 29 | 65 | 68 | 50 | 50 | 47 | 56 | 43 | 43 | 38 | 68 | 45 | 48 | 44 | 40 | 67 | 72 |
| Marino | 33 | 33 | 65 | 65 | 44 | 44 | 41 | 67 | 57 | 57 | 43 | 68 | 50 | 52 | 43 | 38 | 65 | 71 |
| Durzi | 100 | 100 | 89 | 94 | 20 | 22 | 20 | 81 | 83 | 81 | 100 | 84 | 73 | 70 | 40 | 33 | 83 | 86 |
| DeSimone | — | 0 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 83 | 83 | 83 | — | 100 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 100 |
