Game Recap
The Buffalo Sabres defeated the Tampa Bay Lightning 4-2 on April 6, 2026. Despite the result, the Tampa Bay Lightning held the edge in expected goals (2.04 to 1.85) at 5-on-5, indicating the Buffalo Sabres received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Buffalo Sabres created 7 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the Tampa Bay Lightning at 5-on-5. Jake Guentzel was the most dangerous skater with 0.46 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Buffalo Sabres outshot the Tampa Bay Lightning 29-25 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Tampa Bay Lightning vs Buffalo Sabres progressed on Apr 6, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
TBL2 - 4BUF
Apr 6, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| BUF | P1 | 23 | 10 | 69.7 | 16 | 8 | 66.7 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 16 | 7 | 69.6 | 8 | 2 | 80.0 | 1.31 | 0.51 | 72.1 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
| P2 | 20 | 17 | 54.1 | 18 | 14 | 56.3 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 1.51 | 1.15 | 56.9 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 10 | 26 | 27.8 | 9 | 19 | 32.1 | 5 | 9 | 35.7 | 4 | 17 | 19.0 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 0.47 | 1.14 | 29.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 53 | 53 | 50.0 | 43 | 41 | 51.2 | 30 | 25 | 54.5 | 35 | 37 | 48.6 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 3.29 | 2.79 | 54.1 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
| TBL | P1 | 10 | 23 | 30.3 | 8 | 16 | 33.3 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 7 | 16 | 30.4 | 2 | 8 | 20.0 | 0.51 | 1.31 | 27.9 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 |
| P2 | 17 | 20 | 45.9 | 14 | 18 | 43.8 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 1.15 | 1.51 | 43.1 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 26 | 10 | 72.2 | 19 | 9 | 67.9 | 9 | 5 | 64.3 | 17 | 4 | 81.0 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 1.14 | 0.47 | 70.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 53 | 53 | 50.0 | 41 | 43 | 48.8 | 25 | 30 | 45.5 | 37 | 35 | 51.4 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 2.79 | 3.29 | 45.9 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
BUF Favored
TBL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
BUF
TBL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
TBL Attempts
BUF Attempts
Individual Event Map
TBL ShootBUF Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (BUF) performed against every skater on the away team (TBL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = BUF players, Columns = TBL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the BUF player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| BUF ↓ / TBL → | Guentzel | Goncalves | Point | Gourde | Girgensons | Paul | Kucherov | Bjorkstrand | Perry | Holmberg | Chaffee | Sabourin | Raddysh | McDonagh | Cernak | Moser | Lilleberg | D'Astous |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson | 85 | 76 | 17 | 88 | 88 | 67 | 17 | 67 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 79 | 87 | 67 | 75 | 50 |
| Norris | 71 | 71 | 50 | 80 | 67 | 54 | 54 | 60 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 58 | 83 | 83 | 60 | 58 | 67 |
| Krebs | 50 | 50 | 17 | 83 | 83 | 67 | 17 | 67 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 56 | 67 | 57 | 67 | 50 |
| McLeod | 45 | 75 | 25 | 67 | 67 | 20 | 42 | 60 | 60 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 67 | 33 | 67 | 75 | 63 |
| Dunne | 29 | — | — | — | — | 55 | — | 20 | 75 | — | 75 | 75 | 100 | 67 | 29 | 100 | 33 | 33 |
| Benson | 40 | 64 | 43 | 67 | 50 | 47 | 50 | 58 | 60 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 33 | 67 | 62 | 67 |
| Zucker | 90 | 86 | 40 | 83 | 80 | 100 | 40 | 100 | 50 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 71 | 71 |
| Greenway | 17 | 100 | 0 | — | — | 56 | 38 | 13 | 75 | — | 75 | 75 | 38 | 67 | 29 | 100 | 33 | 56 |
| Malenstyn | 18 | — | 0 | — | — | 46 | 0 | 17 | 75 | — | 75 | 75 | 43 | 57 | 29 | 100 | 33 | 33 |
| Tuch | 50 | 64 | 14 | 71 | 75 | 64 | 46 | 60 | 71 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 46 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 80 | 67 |
| Doan | 50 | 57 | 55 | 67 | 0 | 50 | 58 | 60 | 67 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 64 | 33 | 25 | 64 | 58 | 60 |
| Quinn | 82 | 86 | 33 | 83 | 80 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 50 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 91 | 100 | 50 | 71 | 71 |
| Samuelsson | 25 | 52 | 32 | 75 | 67 | 40 | 41 | 38 | 44 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 32 | 14 | 20 | 46 | 55 | 77 |
| Dahlin | 80 | 69 | 42 | 100 | 100 | 57 | 47 | 57 | 60 | 100 | — | 100 | 50 | 80 | 92 | 64 | 63 | 71 |
| Power | 36 | 67 | 22 | 83 | 86 | 62 | 30 | 50 | 80 | 75 | 0 | 75 | 45 | 83 | 80 | 58 | 55 | 63 |
| Byram | 36 | 67 | 29 | 33 | 33 | 53 | 38 | 64 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 60 | 40 | 67 | 75 | 60 |
| Schenn | 18 | 100 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 53 | 56 | 29 | 75 | 50 | 80 | 60 | 64 | 50 | 30 | 75 | 33 | 44 |
| Stanley | 33 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 29 | 63 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 67 | 63 | 33 | 75 | 33 | 29 |
