Calgary Flames vs Anaheim Ducks — April 4, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

A wild one ended 5-3 in favor of the Calgary Flames over the Anaheim Ducks on Saturday. CGY held a slight 12-10 edge in high-danger chances. The underlying numbers told a different story — ANA actually held the xG edge (3.76 to 2.85) at 5-on-5, but it didn't matter on the scoreboard. Morgan Frost found the net 2 times. Shots on goal: ANA 39, CGY 20.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Calgary Flames vs Anaheim Ducks progressed on Apr 4, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

CGY5 - 3ANA

Apr 4, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
ANA	P1	27	16	62.8	23	12	65.7	16	6	72.7	17	13	56.7	7	7	50.0	1.81	1.11	62.0	1	1	50.0
	P2	28	19	59.6	20	12	62.5	10	9	52.6	17	16	51.5	2	9	18.2	1.37	1.43	48.9	0	3	0.0
	P3	26	14	65.0	21	11	65.6	13	5	72.2	14	6	70.0	2	0	100.0	1.15	0.66	63.5	2	1	66.7
	Total	81	49	62.3	64	35	64.6	39	20	66.1	48	35	57.8	11	16	40.7	4.33	3.20	57.5	3	5	37.5
CGY	P1	16	27	37.2	12	23	34.3	6	16	27.3	13	17	43.3	7	7	50.0	1.11	1.81	38.0	1	1	50.0
	P2	19	28	40.4	12	20	37.5	9	10	47.4	16	17	48.5	9	2	81.8	1.43	1.37	51.1	3	0	100.0
	P3	14	26	35.0	11	21	34.4	5	13	27.8	6	14	30.0	0	2	0.0	0.66	1.15	36.5	1	2	33.3
	Total	49	81	37.7	35	64	35.4	20	39	33.9	35	48	42.2	16	11	59.3	3.20	4.33	42.5	5	3	62.5

Win Probability

ANA Favored

CGY Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

ANA

CGY

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

CGY Attempts

ANA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

CGY ShootANA Shoot

Missed Shot

Hit

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (ANA) performed against every skater on the away team (CGY) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = ANA players, Columns = CGY players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the ANA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

ANA ↓ / CGY →	Backlund	Strome	Frost	Pospisil	Sharangovich	Zary	Coleman	Farabee	Olofsson	Coronato	Gridin	Klapka	Whitecloud	Bahl	Määttä	Brzustewicz	Kuznetsov	Parekh
Granlund	62	71	41	73	83	33	50	60	56	59	54	67	69	75	50	45	30	20
Carlsson	75	65	25	63	100	100	50	50	65	45	60	100	58	60	73	67	67	88
McTavish	64	70	25	67	71	71	43	70	70	13	67	67	56	59	70	60	67	64
Poehling	86	67	38	71	67	50	33	69	67	17	46	60	62	69	67	56	67	40
Washe	38	56	25	50	100	75	33	17	0	58	40	100	69	67	20	40	40	25
Gaucher	50	25	0	0	—	100	43	29	33	50	0	—	60	67	0	40	0	17
Kreider	67	82	43	71	75	75	45	61	71	44	65	67	65	69	53	46	50	33
Killorn	75	63	20	67	100	67	38	75	67	20	0	100	56	67	73	57	75	80
Viel	100	67	57	63	71	67	0	60	67	100	57	67	71	75	50	50	80	75
Sennecke	83	60	17	63	100	75	60	57	65	56	40	100	62	68	73	67	57	88
Terry	67	86	50	80	75	75	47	64	71	58	65	67	73	79	53	46	50	33
Hinds	75	68	38	72	90	80	53	50	67	62	50	89	70	73	53	46	69	83
Carlson	68	73	29	72	92	80	56	57	65	65	25	89	71	74	65	54	77	81
LaCombe	93	73	35	69	100	50	64	57	77	67	42	100	77	83	57	56	43	40
Trouba	81	67	36	73	100	67	58	45	77	64	42	100	81	84	47	47	44	29
Helleson	0	45	55	29	50	50	0	75	33	0	80	33	45	47	67	50	36	25
Zellweger	0	45	57	29	50	57	14	67	33	14	67	33	47	50	67	60	36	30
Moore	75	0	25	0	—	67	40	17	0	60	25	—	57	60	0	25	33	0