Game Recap
SJS 4, ANA 3 — the San Jose Sharks got the win on April 1, 2026. Macklin Celebrini had a 2-goal game. Keep an eye on Terry — 0.57 individual xG on 4 shots at 5-on-5. SJS got the two points, but ANA held a 2.83-2.15 expected goals edge at even strength. ANA held a slight 10-9 edge in high-danger chances. Shots on goal: SJS 21, ANA 31.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Anaheim Ducks vs San Jose Sharks progressed on Apr 1, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
ANA3 - 4SJS
Apr 1, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| SJS | P1 | 16 | 18 | 47.1 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 7 | 13 | 35.0 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 1.04 | 1.39 | 42.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 18 | 17 | 51.4 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 16 | 12 | 57.1 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 47.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 11 | 18 | 37.9 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 0.56 | 0.86 | 39.6 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| Total | 45 | 53 | 45.9 | 30 | 43 | 41.1 | 21 | 31 | 40.4 | 36 | 35 | 50.7 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 2.60 | 3.36 | 43.6 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
| ANA | P1 | 18 | 16 | 52.9 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 13 | 7 | 65.0 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 1.39 | 1.04 | 57.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 18 | 48.6 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 12 | 16 | 42.9 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 1.10 | 0.99 | 52.7 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 11 | 62.1 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 0.86 | 0.56 | 60.4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| Total | 53 | 45 | 54.1 | 43 | 30 | 58.9 | 31 | 21 | 59.6 | 35 | 36 | 49.3 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 3.36 | 2.60 | 56.4 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
Win Probability
SJS Favored
ANA Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
SJS
ANA
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
ANA Attempts
SJS Attempts
Individual Event Map
ANA ShootSJS Shoot
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (SJS) performed against every skater on the away team (ANA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = SJS players, Columns = ANA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the SJS player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| SJS ↓ / ANA → | Carlsson | Poehling | Granlund | McTavish | Washe | Gaucher | Kreider | Killorn | Viel | Terry | Sennecke | Vatrano | Carlson | Trouba | LaCombe | Moore | Zellweger | Helleson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wennberg | 50 | 57 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 33 | 48 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 53 | 50 | 50 | 70 | 43 | 50 |
| Celebrini | 38 | 57 | 29 | 50 | 42 | 50 | 43 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 29 | 53 | 50 | 20 | 67 | 40 |
| Smith | 33 | 57 | 36 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 46 | 33 | 40 | 0 | 50 | 27 | 53 | 50 | 17 | 67 | 50 |
| Goodrow | 0 | 50 | 10 | 54 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 20 | 40 | 33 | 0 | 56 | 45 |
| Toffoli | 25 | 69 | 50 | 75 | — | 100 | 0 | 100 | 64 | 0 | 60 | 100 | 58 | 63 | 60 | 50 | 67 | 75 |
| Dellandrea | 0 | 56 | 0 | 67 | 0 | — | 0 | 33 | 55 | 0 | 57 | 100 | 40 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 60 | 40 |
| Ostapchuk | 0 | 50 | 14 | 58 | 0 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 25 | 50 | 40 | 0 | 71 | 63 |
| Misa | 25 | 64 | — | 67 | — | — | 0 | 100 | 64 | 0 | 60 | 100 | 56 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 67 |
| Sherwood | 52 | 33 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 53 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 58 | 55 | 58 | 64 | 33 | 33 |
| Eklund | 59 | 33 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 59 | 100 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 55 | 55 | 70 | 33 | — |
| Graf | 25 | 33 | 31 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 36 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 55 | 50 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Gaudette | — | 100 | 33 | 58 | 0 | 58 | — | 0 | — | — | — | 58 | 40 | 50 | 67 | 0 | 71 | 71 |
| Ferraro | 41 | 40 | 14 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 45 | 39 | 42 | 0 | 36 | 50 | 44 | 60 | 38 | 29 |
| Desharnais | 29 | 25 | 42 | 50 | 71 | 60 | 29 | 57 | 0 | 32 | 20 | 50 | 23 | 60 | 59 | 38 | 40 | 33 |
| Orlov | 63 | 50 | 60 | 63 | 71 | 67 | 56 | 75 | 0 | 60 | 25 | 67 | 46 | 73 | 83 | 44 | 50 | 50 |
| Dickinson | 38 | 88 | 18 | 63 | 25 | 57 | 60 | 27 | 75 | 50 | 60 | 63 | 44 | 44 | 33 | 38 | 86 | 71 |
| Mukhamadullin | 42 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 50 | 45 | 33 | 45 | 0 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 50 | 29 | 29 |
| Leddy | 10 | 86 | 17 | 63 | 25 | 57 | 14 | 20 | 75 | 13 | 60 | 63 | 33 | 33 | 25 | 27 | 83 | 67 |
