Game Recap
The Seattle Kraken couldn't find the back of the net as the Edmonton Oilers cruised to a 3-0 win on March 31, 2026. The numbers backed up the result — EDM generated 2.22 expected goals to SEA's 1.83 at 5-on-5 (43.8% Corsi). Savoie was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 0.50 individual expected goals on 4 shots.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Seattle Kraken vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Mar 31, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
SEA0 - 3EDM
Mar 31, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| EDM | P1 | 21 | 18 | 53.8 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 12 | 6 | 66.7 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 1.41 | 0.62 | 69.4 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 16 | 27 | 37.2 | 14 | 19 | 42.4 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 48.5 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 9 | 15 | 37.5 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 3 | 8 | 27.3 | 3 | 9 | 25.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.43 | 0.78 | 35.7 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 46 | 60 | 43.4 | 38 | 43 | 46.9 | 24 | 27 | 47.1 | 29 | 36 | 44.6 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 2.78 | 2.40 | 53.7 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| SEA | P1 | 18 | 21 | 46.2 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 6 | 12 | 33.3 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 0.62 | 1.41 | 30.6 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 27 | 16 | 62.8 | 19 | 14 | 57.6 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 6 | 0 | 100.0 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 51.5 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 15 | 9 | 62.5 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 8 | 3 | 72.7 | 9 | 3 | 75.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.43 | 64.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 60 | 46 | 56.6 | 43 | 38 | 53.1 | 27 | 24 | 52.9 | 36 | 29 | 55.4 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 2.40 | 2.78 | 46.3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
Win Probability
EDM Favored
SEA Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
EDM
SEA
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
SEA Attempts
EDM Attempts
Individual Event Map
SEA ShootEDM Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (SEA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = EDM players, Columns = SEA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| EDM ↓ / SEA → | Beniers | Stephenson | McMann | Gaudreau | Catton | Meyers | Fisker Molgaard | McCann | Schwartz | Eberle | Tolvanen | Kakko | Dunn | Larsson | Evans | Montour | Lindgren | Oleksiak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDavid | 59 | 67 | 50 | 40 | 83 | 44 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 46 | 25 | 100 | 55 | 55 | 71 | 64 | 100 | 100 |
| Savoie | 47 | 50 | 75 | 29 | 79 | 33 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 43 | 33 | 100 | 44 | 47 | 73 | 75 | — | — |
| Nugent-Hopkins | 44 | 50 | 0 | 67 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 75 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 43 | 33 | 0 | 75 | 63 |
| Henrique | 0 | 36 | 38 | 50 | — | 33 | 67 | 50 | 75 | 0 | 50 | 38 | 33 | 38 | 50 | 56 | 50 | 20 |
| Dickinson | 0 | 26 | 38 | 33 | — | 33 | 67 | 22 | 67 | 0 | 33 | 38 | 18 | 29 | 56 | 56 | 33 | 20 |
| Roslovic | 50 | 50 | 33 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 75 | 67 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 80 | 75 |
| Lazar | 100 | 67 | 67 | 40 | 100 | 40 | 25 | 33 | 25 | 80 | 33 | 100 | 50 | 60 | 56 | 56 | 50 | 50 |
| Samanski | 100 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 80 | 50 | 100 | 60 | 75 | 63 | 63 | 50 | 100 |
| Hyman | 55 | 67 | 50 | 75 | 86 | 67 | 50 | 38 | 80 | 29 | 33 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 20 | 80 | 63 |
| Jones | 100 | 67 | 67 | 40 | 100 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 80 | 40 | 100 | 60 | 75 | 56 | 56 | 50 | 100 |
| Podkolzin | 42 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 77 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 42 | 20 | 100 | 36 | 40 | 77 | 70 | 100 | 100 |
| Kapanen | 0 | 19 | 30 | 33 | — | 33 | 67 | 15 | 67 | 0 | 33 | 30 | 18 | 29 | 30 | 30 | 33 | 17 |
| Murphy | 15 | 20 | 44 | 33 | 100 | 33 | 60 | 25 | 67 | 15 | 38 | 44 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 45 | 60 | 33 |
| Nurse | 15 | 20 | 38 | 33 | 100 | 33 | 60 | 25 | 60 | 15 | 29 | 38 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 40 | 60 | 33 |
| Bouchard | 53 | 75 | 75 | 44 | 80 | 50 | 80 | 0 | 89 | 46 | 33 | 100 | 47 | 50 | 77 | 73 | 50 | 100 |
| Ekholm | 59 | 75 | 67 | 44 | 82 | 43 | 80 | 0 | 89 | 46 | 27 | 100 | 52 | 57 | 73 | 70 | 67 | — |
| Walman | 83 | 38 | 38 | 60 | 86 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 67 | 60 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 57 | 45 | 50 | 75 | 67 |
| Emberson | 80 | 29 | 29 | 50 | 83 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 33 | 33 | 40 | 40 | 45 | 45 | 67 | 67 |
