Game Recap
The Utah Mammoth defeated the Los Angeles Kings 6-2 on March 28, 2026. Despite the result, the Los Angeles Kings held the edge in expected goals (3.21 to 2.88) at 5-on-5, indicating the Utah Mammoth received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Los Angeles Kings created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 7 from the Utah Mammoth at 5-on-5. Alexander Kerfoot scored 2 goals. Logan Cooley scored 2 goals. Quinton Byfield was the most dangerous skater with 0.48 individual expected goals on 3 shots at 5-on-5. The Los Angeles Kings outshot the Utah Mammoth 31-28 in total shots on goal.
- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Los Angeles Kings progressed on Mar 28, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| LAK | P1 | 15 | 30 | 33.3 | 13 | 18 | 41.9 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 5 | 21 | 19.2 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 0.76 | 1.74 | 30.3 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 19 | 52.5 | 16 | 9 | 64.0 | 8 | 4 | 66.7 | 14 | 14 | 50.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.23 | 0.81 | 60.4 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 24 | 16 | 60.0 | 18 | 13 | 58.1 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 1.43 | 1.13 | 55.9 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 60 | 65 | 48.0 | 47 | 40 | 54.0 | 31 | 28 | 52.5 | 35 | 46 | 43.2 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 3.42 | 3.68 | 48.2 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | |
| UTA | P1 | 30 | 15 | 66.7 | 18 | 13 | 58.1 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 21 | 5 | 80.8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 1.74 | 0.76 | 69.7 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 |
| P2 | 19 | 21 | 47.5 | 9 | 16 | 36.0 | 4 | 8 | 33.3 | 14 | 14 | 50.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 0.81 | 1.23 | 39.6 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 24 | 40.0 | 13 | 18 | 41.9 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 1.13 | 1.43 | 44.1 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 65 | 60 | 52.0 | 40 | 47 | 46.0 | 28 | 31 | 47.5 | 46 | 35 | 56.8 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 3.68 | 3.42 | 51.8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | |
Win Probability
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
Shot Density Heatmap
Individual Event Map
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (LAK) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = LAK players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the LAK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| LAK ↓ / UTA → | Schmaltz | Cooley | McBain | Stenlund | Kerfoot | Crouse | Carcone | Tanev | Keller | Guenther | Peterka | Yamamoto | Sergachev | Weegar | Schmidt | Marino | Durzi | Cole |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kopitar | 67 | 45 | 33 | 80 | 60 | 100 | 40 | 67 | 50 | 45 | 33 | 44 | 50 | 57 | 60 | 56 | 33 | 43 |
| Laughton | 83 | 17 | 14 | 57 | 71 | 100 | 14 | 67 | 71 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 25 | 38 | 57 | 50 | 54 | 50 |
| Helenius | 0 | 50 | 0 | 17 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 50 |
| Moore | 41 | 20 | 33 | 67 | 50 | 44 | 36 | 33 | 33 | 17 | 30 | 40 | 57 | 54 | 46 | 38 | 13 | 14 |
| Panarin | 80 | 42 | 33 | 55 | 50 | 80 | 33 | 60 | 50 | 42 | 22 | 38 | 50 | 55 | 58 | 50 | 33 | 45 |
| Malott | 0 | 50 | 14 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 14 | 20 | 0 | 50 | 14 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 |
| Laferriere | 40 | 0 | 57 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 40 | 31 | 0 | 50 | 67 | 47 | 53 | 46 | 38 | 50 | 100 |
| Byfield | 42 | 0 | 33 | 75 | 60 | 50 | 36 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 30 | 25 | 53 | 57 | 50 | 42 | 0 | 14 |
| Kempe | 75 | 45 | 17 | 57 | 40 | 100 | 18 | 100 | 67 | 42 | 14 | 30 | 44 | 50 | 60 | 56 | 15 | 21 |
| Armia | 100 | 17 | 0 | 67 | 50 | 83 | 0 | 67 | 71 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 29 | 43 | 40 | 55 | 44 |
| Joseph | 100 | 29 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 83 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 43 | 40 | 67 | 50 |
| Wright | 0 | 50 | 17 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 17 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 17 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 60 |
| Doughty | 42 | 22 | 20 | 45 | 44 | 53 | 25 | 50 | 39 | 22 | 14 | 67 | 39 | 47 | 42 | 27 | 60 | 67 |
| Clarke | 64 | 33 | 44 | 86 | 50 | 64 | 44 | 50 | 45 | 33 | 44 | 17 | 45 | 44 | 56 | 50 | 50 | 43 |
| Edmundson | 58 | 33 | 44 | 83 | 33 | 64 | 44 | 50 | 45 | 33 | 44 | 29 | 30 | 38 | 56 | 53 | 57 | 50 |
| Anderson | 31 | 25 | 0 | 38 | 36 | 45 | 0 | 45 | 33 | 25 | 0 | 67 | 35 | 43 | 14 | 13 | 45 | 50 |
| Ceci | 0 | 43 | 16 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 17 | 75 | 67 | 33 | 12 | 33 | 25 | 27 | 40 | 50 | 31 | 21 |
| Dumoulin | — | 20 | 18 | 33 | 33 | 100 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 14 | 14 | 25 | 20 | 27 | 40 | 50 | 17 | 9 |
