Game Recap
CAR 5, NJD 2 — the Carolina Hurricanes got the win on March 28, 2026. CAR had a big edge in high-danger chances, 18-4 over NJD at 5-on-5. At 5-on-5, CAR carried the play with 3.94 expected goals and a 64.7% share of shot attempts. Shots on goal: CAR 34, NJD 20.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as New Jersey Devils vs Carolina Hurricanes progressed on Mar 28, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NJD2 - 5CAR
Mar 28, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CAR | P1 | 19 | 14 | 57.6 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 8 | 6 | 57.1 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 0.98 | 0.87 | 53.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 32 | 13 | 71.1 | 24 | 9 | 72.7 | 15 | 5 | 75.0 | 23 | 10 | 69.7 | 8 | 2 | 80.0 | 2.04 | 0.66 | 75.5 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 22 | 18 | 55.0 | 15 | 12 | 55.6 | 11 | 9 | 55.0 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 1.27 | 0.81 | 61.1 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 73 | 45 | 61.9 | 54 | 32 | 62.8 | 34 | 20 | 63.0 | 53 | 34 | 60.9 | 19 | 6 | 76.0 | 4.29 | 2.33 | 64.8 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | |
| NJD | P1 | 14 | 19 | 42.4 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 6 | 8 | 42.9 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 46.8 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 13 | 32 | 28.9 | 9 | 24 | 27.3 | 5 | 15 | 25.0 | 10 | 23 | 30.3 | 2 | 8 | 20.0 | 0.66 | 2.04 | 24.5 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 22 | 45.0 | 12 | 15 | 44.4 | 9 | 11 | 45.0 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 0.81 | 1.27 | 38.9 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 45 | 73 | 38.1 | 32 | 54 | 37.2 | 20 | 34 | 37.0 | 34 | 53 | 39.1 | 6 | 19 | 24.0 | 2.33 | 4.29 | 35.2 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | |
Win Probability
CAR Favored
NJD Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CAR
NJD
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NJD Attempts
CAR Attempts
Individual Event Map
NJD ShootCAR Shoot
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CAR) performed against every skater on the away team (NJD) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CAR players, Columns = NJD players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CAR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CAR ↓ / NJD → | Hughes | Mercer | Hischier | Glass | Bjugstad | Bratt | Dadonov | Cotter | Meier | Brown | Hameenaho | Tsyplakov | Hamilton | Siegenthaler | Hughes | Kovacevic | Nemec | Dillon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staal | 50 | 57 | 56 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 75 | 100 | 0 | 47 | 47 | 55 | 60 | 67 | 71 |
| Stankoven | 77 | 50 | 50 | 92 | 50 | 100 | 69 | 50 | 75 | 67 | 92 | 57 | 91 | 93 | 70 | 67 | 64 | 38 |
| Aho | 59 | 75 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 57 | 88 | 100 | 50 | 58 | 83 | 100 | 71 | 77 | 71 | 60 | 64 | 64 |
| Jarvis | 59 | 67 | 57 | 100 | 100 | 57 | 88 | 67 | 50 | 58 | 83 | 100 | 71 | 77 | 67 | 55 | 64 | 64 |
| Hall | 85 | — | — | 92 | 50 | 100 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 78 | 92 | 57 | 90 | 93 | 80 | 78 | 70 | 43 |
| Ehlers | 38 | 54 | 52 | 100 | 50 | 40 | 25 | 100 | 52 | 40 | 100 | 0 | 44 | 47 | 50 | 50 | 62 | 60 |
| Martinook | 57 | 54 | 54 | 100 | 100 | 57 | — | — | 54 | 75 | — | — | 53 | 53 | 56 | 57 | 63 | 60 |
| Robinson | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 50 | — | 100 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 80 |
| Jankowski | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | — | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Carrier | 100 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 100 | — | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 83 | 100 | 100 |
| Blake | 75 | 50 | 50 | 92 | 75 | 100 | 69 | 75 | 67 | 67 | 92 | 80 | 90 | 93 | 70 | 67 | 78 | 50 |
| Svechnikov | 61 | 78 | 71 | 100 | 50 | 58 | 86 | 67 | 67 | 61 | 100 | 50 | 71 | 71 | 71 | 55 | 73 | 67 |
| Miller | 56 | 55 | 55 | 100 | 67 | 67 | 57 | 60 | 55 | 53 | 50 | 67 | 53 | 54 | 63 | 64 | 50 | 60 |
| Walker | 69 | 55 | 55 | 100 | 67 | 75 | 67 | 75 | 55 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 60 | 64 | 67 | 70 | 50 | 62 |
| Gostisbehere | 67 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 50 | 100 | 81 | 60 | 100 | 50 | 95 | 50 | 88 | 92 | 87 | 85 | 75 | 67 |
| Slavin | 58 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 58 | 100 | 50 | 47 | 59 | 100 | 100 | 63 | 62 | 17 | 14 | 73 | 64 |
| Nikishin | 83 | 100 | — | 95 | 50 | 100 | 85 | 60 | 100 | 75 | 95 | 50 | 88 | 92 | 87 | 83 | 82 | 71 |
| Chatfield | 63 | 58 | 58 | 100 | 100 | 61 | 100 | 100 | 53 | 65 | 100 | 100 | 71 | 68 | 20 | 17 | 75 | 67 |
