Anaheim Ducks vs Edmonton Oilers — March 28, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Edmonton Oilers defeated the Anaheim Ducks 4-2 on March 28, 2026. Expected goals were closely matched at 5-on-5 (EDM 2.76, ANA 2.89), making this a tightly contested game on both sides of the puck. The Edmonton Oilers created 15 high-danger scoring chances compared to 13 from the Anaheim Ducks at 5-on-5. Cutter Gauthier was the most dangerous skater with 0.48 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Edmonton Oilers outshot the Anaheim Ducks 34-29 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Anaheim Ducks vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Mar 28, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

ANA2 - 4EDM

Mar 28, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
EDM	P1	21	21	50.0	17	14	54.8	15	12	55.6	14	13	51.9	6	5	54.5	1.49	0.98	60.3	0	0	—
	P2	24	21	53.3	18	12	60.0	11	3	78.6	19	18	51.4	10	4	71.4	1.70	0.91	65.0	1	0	100.0
	P3	18	26	40.9	12	22	35.3	8	18	30.8	16	18	47.1	6	6	50.0	1.12	1.70	39.7	3	2	60.0
	Total	63	68	48.1	47	48	49.5	34	33	50.7	49	49	50.0	22	15	59.5	4.31	3.60	54.5	4	2	66.7
ANA	P1	21	21	50.0	14	17	45.2	12	15	44.4	13	14	48.1	5	6	45.5	0.98	1.49	39.7	0	0	—
	P2	21	24	46.7	12	18	40.0	3	11	21.4	18	19	48.6	4	10	28.6	0.91	1.70	35.0	0	1	0.0
	P3	26	18	59.1	22	12	64.7	18	8	69.2	18	16	52.9	6	6	50.0	1.70	1.12	60.3	2	3	40.0
	Total	68	63	51.9	48	47	50.5	33	34	49.3	49	49	50.0	15	22	40.5	3.60	4.31	45.5	2	4	33.3

Win Probability

EDM Favored

ANA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

EDM

ANA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

ANA Attempts

EDM Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

ANA ShootEDM Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (ANA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = EDM players, Columns = ANA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

EDM ↓ / ANA →	Granlund	Carlsson	Poehling	Washe	McTavish	Viel	Killorn	Kreider	Gauthier	Terry	Sennecke	Vatrano	Carlson	LaCombe	Trouba	Zellweger	Moore	Helleson
Savoie	56	38	62	100	33	44	38	58	25	43	46	100	58	47	80	57	64	33
McDavid	58	38	68	91	100	53	67	63	45	44	55	100	68	63	76	45	73	40
Nugent-Hopkins	91	54	50	55	33	27	58	64	19	64	57	50	48	38	65	90	0	88
Henrique	0	25	60	60	25	13	0	60	20	25	0	40	14	17	50	88	33	88
Dickinson	40	38	33	33	29	0	44	55	33	30	50	0	17	46	57	25	40	38
Roslovic	100	36	57	64	67	29	50	64	25	44	75	50	17	46	50	73	0	83
Samanski	45	63	0	0	13	0	40	80	25	60	45	0	33	50	67	22	67	33
Lazar	0	50	33	33	40	17	0	50	29	50	0	40	22	20	33	75	100	75
Hyman	100	38	56	58	67	35	75	57	33	50	60	50	47	53	68	86	11	80
Jones	0	80	43	50	40	33	0	83	43	80	0	50	33	30	67	83	100	83
Podkolzin	50	67	81	90	100	57	64	100	50	75	55	100	69	67	79	82	67	78
Kapanen	40	57	50	20	14	0	50	83	50	60	50	0	33	56	67	30	67	43
Nurse	53	69	56	36	21	30	28	77	25	73	35	27	37	37	67	50	43	46
Murphy	50	71	71	36	20	38	19	79	27	73	31	27	42	38	64	47	60	50
Bouchard	57	20	62	91	60	38	62	56	28	38	54	100	54	56	79	75	47	60
Ekholm	63	43	70	91	100	38	67	87	40	55	73	100	50	67	67	90	47	100
Walman	17	17	43	63	33	23	40	38	29	15	25	33	8	28	38	50	25	75
Emberson	40	40	20	25	33	27	67	33	27	36	50	33	11	27	38	44	50	71