Game Recap
The Montreal Canadiens squeezed past the Columbus Blue Jackets 2-1 on March 26, 2026. CBJ had a big edge in high-danger chances, 10-3 over MTL at 5-on-5. Dig into the 5-on-5 data, and CBJ had the better of it (2.70 xG to 1.30). Sometimes the bounces just don't go your way. CBJ outshot MTL 26-20.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Columbus Blue Jackets vs Montreal Canadiens progressed on Mar 26, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CBJ1 - 2MTL
Mar 26, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| MTL | P1 | 11 | 29 | 27.5 | 9 | 18 | 33.3 | 6 | 13 | 31.6 | 6 | 21 | 22.2 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 0.61 | 1.24 | 33.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 19 | 47.2 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 8 | 6 | 57.1 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 44.6 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 13 | 14 | 48.1 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 6 | 7 | 46.2 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 0.54 | 1.05 | 34.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 41 | 62 | 39.8 | 31 | 44 | 41.3 | 20 | 26 | 43.5 | 24 | 46 | 34.3 | 4 | 12 | 25.0 | 1.88 | 3.20 | 37.0 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| CBJ | P1 | 29 | 11 | 72.5 | 18 | 9 | 66.7 | 13 | 6 | 68.4 | 21 | 6 | 77.8 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | 1.24 | 0.61 | 67.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 19 | 17 | 52.8 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 6 | 8 | 42.9 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 0.91 | 0.73 | 55.4 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 14 | 13 | 51.9 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 7 | 6 | 53.8 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 1.05 | 0.54 | 66.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 62 | 41 | 60.2 | 44 | 31 | 58.7 | 26 | 20 | 56.5 | 46 | 24 | 65.7 | 12 | 4 | 75.0 | 3.20 | 1.88 | 63.0 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
MTL Favored
CBJ Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
MTL
CBJ
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CBJ Attempts
MTL Attempts
Individual Event Map
CBJ ShootMTL Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (MTL) performed against every skater on the away team (CBJ) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = MTL players, Columns = CBJ players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the MTL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| MTL ↓ / CBJ → | Fantilli | Jenner | Lundeström | Monahan | Coyle | Sillinger | Marchment | Wood | Heinen | Marchenko | Olivier | Garland | Werenski | Provorov | Severson | Gudbranson | Fabbro | Mateychuk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evans | 17 | 33 | 50 | 17 | 25 | 22 | 18 | 33 | 25 | 22 | 18 | 25 | 22 | 38 | 9 | 17 | 50 | 14 |
| Suzuki | 22 | 86 | 100 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 22 | 100 | 50 | 20 | 100 | 43 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 71 | 50 | 75 |
| Newhook | 17 | 43 | 33 | 57 | 100 | 25 | 33 | 33 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 80 | 38 | 60 | 30 | 36 | 100 | 50 |
| Kapanen | 20 | 33 | 25 | 57 | 100 | 14 | 25 | 33 | 100 | 25 | 14 | 80 | 38 | 50 | 38 | 30 | 67 | 29 |
| Danault | 0 | 33 | 25 | 0 | 60 | 67 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 40 | 29 | 0 | 67 | 0 |
| Veleno | — | 40 | 25 | 0 | 80 | 75 | — | 40 | 0 | 0 | 60 | — | 75 | 50 | 60 | 0 | 67 | 0 |
| Slafkovský | 15 | 83 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 15 | 100 | 50 | 18 | 100 | 43 | 50 | 32 | 67 | 50 | 46 | 67 |
| Demidov | 20 | 43 | 25 | 56 | 100 | 25 | 33 | 50 | 67 | 25 | 25 | 57 | 33 | 57 | 38 | 45 | 50 | 33 |
| Caufield | 22 | 83 | 71 | 50 | 67 | 33 | 22 | 100 | 50 | 20 | 33 | 43 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 40 |
| Bolduc | 29 | 67 | 67 | 33 | 17 | 17 | 29 | 50 | 33 | 29 | 17 | 33 | 20 | 50 | 0 | 38 | 50 | 20 |
| Anderson | 29 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 17 | 17 | 29 | 50 | 100 | 33 | 14 | 100 | 14 | 60 | 0 | 33 | 75 | 33 |
| Gallagher | 0 | 50 | 40 | 0 | 80 | 50 | — | 40 | 0 | 0 | 43 | — | 75 | 60 | 43 | 17 | 67 | 0 |
| Dobson | 13 | 50 | 36 | 50 | 50 | 11 | 17 | 50 | 56 | 14 | 10 | 63 | 44 | 37 | 27 | 24 | 40 | 20 |
| Hutson | 100 | 44 | 43 | 44 | 55 | 55 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 43 | 55 | 50 | 38 | 50 | 83 | 50 |
| Matheson | 6 | 44 | 43 | 44 | 50 | 14 | 8 | 57 | 57 | 7 | 14 | 50 | 29 | 32 | 20 | 17 | 40 | 29 |
| Carrier | 22 | 67 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 40 | 18 | 0 | 67 | 0 |
| Guhle | 30 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 100 | 100 | 38 | 0 | 100 | 30 | 40 | 38 | 25 | 50 | 25 |
| Struble | — | 43 | 40 | 38 | 83 | 75 | — | 50 | 50 | 0 | 75 | 43 | 56 | 43 | 50 | 43 | 100 | 60 |
