Edmonton Oilers vs Utah Mammoth — March 24, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Edmonton Oilers came away with a 5-2 victory over the Utah Mammoth on March 24, 2026. The numbers backed up the result — EDM generated 2.75 expected goals to UTA's 1.59 at 5-on-5 (51.9% Corsi). Connor McDavid had a 2-goal game. UTA generated 12 high-danger looks compared to just 8 from EDM. Roslovic put up 2 goals.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Mar 24, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

EDM5 - 2UTA

Mar 24, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	18	16	52.9	8	11	42.1	3	8	27.3	14	12	53.8	5	3	62.5	0.41	0.72	36.2	1	1	50.0
	P2	23	26	46.9	12	17	41.4	7	7	50.0	19	17	52.8	6	3	66.7	0.85	1.39	37.8	1	3	25.0
	P3	18	20	47.4	13	14	48.1	8	11	42.1	11	6	64.7	3	3	50.0	0.82	1.03	44.3	0	1	0.0
	Total	59	62	48.8	33	42	44.0	18	26	40.9	44	35	55.7	14	9	60.9	2.08	3.15	39.8	2	5	28.6
EDM	P1	16	18	47.1	11	8	57.9	8	3	72.7	12	14	46.2	3	5	37.5	0.72	0.41	63.8	1	1	50.0
	P2	26	23	53.1	17	12	58.6	7	7	50.0	17	19	47.2	3	6	33.3	1.39	0.85	62.2	3	1	75.0
	P3	20	18	52.6	14	13	51.9	11	8	57.9	6	11	35.3	3	3	50.0	1.03	0.82	55.7	1	0	100.0
	Total	62	59	51.2	42	33	56.0	26	18	59.1	35	44	44.3	9	14	39.1	3.15	2.08	60.2	5	2	71.4

Win Probability

UTA Favored

EDM Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

EDM

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

EDM Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

EDM ShootUTA Shoot

Attempt Blocked

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / EDM →	McDavid	Nugent-Hopkins	Savoie	Roslovic	Dickinson	Samanski	Henrique	Hyman	Jarventie	Jones	Podkolzin	Kapanen	Bouchard	Ekholm	Nurse	Walman	Murphy	Emberson
Cooley	36	55	27	40	50	70	0	44	0	0	30	67	29	25	38	46	38	46
Schmaltz	38	40	25	40	57	60	75	43	63	80	54	57	42	45	50	50	53	57
McBain	33	57	36	60	50	0	67	50	0	0	36	50	38	42	56	25	67	0
Stenlund	14	50	17	53	57	50	50	43	40	40	14	67	25	33	50	60	43	67
Kerfoot	20	56	20	56	70	67	60	53	50	50	17	70	36	44	56	75	50	75
Hayton	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Crouse	29	22	35	14	50	33	75	13	20	33	33	43	29	37	40	0	47	0
Carcone	35	60	39	57	60	0	67	55	0	0	35	50	41	46	56	25	67	0
Guenther	38	56	25	41	38	75	30	43	38	38	36	62	29	33	40	54	38	56
Keller	33	43	14	57	53	50	67	43	63	67	50	53	33	33	50	60	45	60
Peterka	42	63	56	43	43	75	25	50	0	0	38	70	43	50	33	48	43	50
Yamamoto	50	82	—	88	75	63	75	75	60	50	100	80	73	73	88	63	78	63
Sergachev	27	40	25	44	33	0	71	46	57	60	26	50	21	24	40	50	67	64
Weegar	25	0	32	20	50	0	86	17	50	60	27	50	28	35	30	36	40	57
Marino	29	58	25	43	71	71	17	38	14	14	20	76	50	50	38	63	33	63
Schmidt	56	67	50	53	69	73	17	53	17	17	50	76	54	55	50	72	41	71
Durzi	33	55	33	55	55	40	50	52	33	25	55	55	50	56	63	38	59	38
Cole	0	56	0	56	50	33	33	56	25	33	50	50	63	71	55	33	50	33