Game Recap
The Nashville Predators came away with a 4-1 victory over the Vegas Golden Knights on March 21, 2026. Steven Stamkos found the net 2 times. The underlying numbers told a different story — VGK actually held the xG edge (3.09 to 1.55) at 5-on-5, but it didn't matter on the scoreboard. High-danger chances at 5-on-5: VGK 10, NSH 7. VGK peppered the net with 40 shots to NSH's 20.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Vegas Golden Knights vs Nashville Predators progressed on Mar 21, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
VGK1 - 4NSH
Mar 21, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NSH | P1 | 7 | 36 | 16.3 | 4 | 29 | 12.1 | 4 | 20 | 16.7 | 4 | 23 | 14.8 | 2 | 9 | 18.2 | 0.26 | 2.51 | 9.5 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 16 | 56.8 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 6 | 0 | 100.0 | 1.49 | 0.64 | 69.9 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| P3 | 12 | 26 | 31.6 | 10 | 19 | 34.5 | 5 | 10 | 33.3 | 9 | 17 | 34.6 | 4 | 9 | 30.8 | 0.89 | 1.57 | 36.1 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| Total | 40 | 78 | 33.9 | 31 | 60 | 34.1 | 20 | 40 | 33.3 | 27 | 50 | 35.1 | 12 | 18 | 40.0 | 2.64 | 4.72 | 35.8 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | |
| VGK | P1 | 36 | 7 | 83.7 | 29 | 4 | 87.9 | 20 | 4 | 83.3 | 23 | 4 | 85.2 | 9 | 2 | 81.8 | 2.51 | 0.26 | 90.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 16 | 21 | 43.2 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.64 | 1.49 | 30.1 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| P3 | 26 | 12 | 68.4 | 19 | 10 | 65.5 | 10 | 5 | 66.7 | 17 | 9 | 65.4 | 9 | 4 | 69.2 | 1.57 | 0.89 | 63.9 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| Total | 78 | 40 | 66.1 | 60 | 31 | 65.9 | 40 | 20 | 66.7 | 50 | 27 | 64.9 | 18 | 12 | 60.0 | 4.72 | 2.64 | 64.2 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | |
Win Probability
NSH Favored
VGK Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NSH
VGK
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
VGK Attempts
NSH Attempts
Individual Event Map
VGK ShootNSH Shoot
Save
Goal Against
Missed Shot Against
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NSH) performed against every skater on the away team (VGK) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NSH players, Columns = VGK players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NSH player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NSH ↓ / VGK → | Eichel | Hertl | Sissons | Howden | Dowd | Barbashev | Stone | Dorofeyev | Marner | Smith | Kolesar | Bowman | Andersson | McNabb | Hanifin | Lauzon | Theodore | Hutton |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O'Reilly | 27 | 25 | 100 | — | 67 | 11 | 32 | 25 | 25 | 67 | 40 | — | 88 | 31 | 82 | 67 | 25 | 50 |
| Stamkos | 50 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 75 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 75 | 59 | 100 | 71 | 30 | 100 |
| Jost | 54 | 33 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 50 | 55 | 33 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 57 | 33 | 50 | 63 | 40 |
| Svechkov | 67 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 67 | 50 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 100 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wiesblatt | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Forsberg | 63 | 18 | 43 | 14 | 33 | 25 | 83 | 18 | 25 | 50 | 17 | 0 | 67 | 54 | 25 | 71 | 22 | 0 |
| Haula | 71 | 33 | 50 | 80 | 50 | 57 | 75 | 36 | 41 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 55 | 64 | 50 | 50 | 64 | 33 |
| L'Heureux | 64 | 38 | 0 | 75 | — | 56 | 67 | 40 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 75 | 50 | 38 | 70 | 40 |
| Schaefer | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marchessault | 63 | 20 | 43 | 13 | 50 | 25 | 100 | 22 | 33 | 43 | 13 | 0 | 57 | 70 | 27 | 63 | 25 | 0 |
| Evangelista | 47 | 75 | 60 | 0 | 100 | 40 | 47 | 75 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 75 | 38 | 89 | 25 | 36 | 100 |
| Wood | 100 | 17 | 38 | 0 | — | 33 | 100 | 17 | 14 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 83 | 33 | 36 | 0 | 40 | 0 |
| Hague | 67 | 35 | 0 | 60 | 25 | 50 | 67 | 35 | 33 | 22 | 25 | 0 | 43 | 64 | 29 | 43 | 42 | 33 |
| Josi | 35 | 29 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 29 | 39 | 29 | 40 | 38 | 17 | 0 | 45 | 53 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 0 |
| Skjei | 28 | 20 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 30 | 20 | 23 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 23 | 63 | 0 | 33 | 0 |
| Perbix | 40 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 43 | 40 | 13 | 13 | 40 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 50 | 18 | 17 | 0 | 23 |
| Barron | 83 | 38 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 40 | 83 | 40 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 56 | 25 | 40 | 42 | 14 |
| Ufko | 100 | 0 | 30 | 0 | — | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 50 | 0 |
