Anaheim Ducks vs Utah Mammoth — March 20, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Anaheim Ducks defeated the Utah Mammoth 4-1 on March 20, 2026. Despite the result, the Utah Mammoth held the edge in expected goals (7.85 to 3.96) at 5-on-5, indicating the Anaheim Ducks received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Utah Mammoth created 8 high-danger scoring chances compared to 4 from the Anaheim Ducks at 5-on-5. Lawson Crouse was the most dangerous skater with 2.07 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Utah Mammoth outshot the Anaheim Ducks 30-24 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Anaheim Ducks vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Mar 20, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

ANA4 - 1UTA

Mar 20, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	29	10	74.4	18	8	69.2	14	5	73.7	22	5	81.5	4	0	100.0	1.09	0.46	70.2	1	1	50.0
	P2	20	21	48.8	12	14	46.2	9	9	50.0	16	19	45.7	5	4	55.6	1.17	1.25	48.3	0	1	0.0
	P3	26	19	57.8	16	16	50.0	7	10	41.2	19	12	61.3	5	2	71.4	1.36	1.02	57.0	0	2	0.0
	Total	75	50	60.0	46	38	54.8	30	24	55.6	57	36	61.3	14	6	70.0	3.61	2.73	56.9	1	4	20.0
ANA	P1	10	29	25.6	8	18	30.8	5	14	26.3	5	22	18.5	0	4	0.0	0.46	1.09	29.8	1	1	50.0
	P2	21	20	51.2	14	12	53.8	9	9	50.0	19	16	54.3	4	5	44.4	1.25	1.17	51.7	1	0	100.0
	P3	19	26	42.2	16	16	50.0	10	7	58.8	12	19	38.7	2	5	28.6	1.02	1.36	43.0	2	0	100.0
	Total	50	75	40.0	38	46	45.2	24	30	44.4	36	57	38.7	6	14	30.0	2.73	3.61	43.1	4	1	80.0

Win Probability

UTA Favored

ANA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

ANA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

ANA Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

ANA ShootUTA Shoot

Goal

Shot on Net

Hit

Hit Taken

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (ANA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = ANA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / ANA →	Poehling	Carlsson	Granlund	Washe	McTavish	Harkins	Gauthier	Viel	Killorn	Kreider	Terry	Sennecke	Mintyukov	Carlson	Trouba	LaCombe	Zellweger	Moore
Schmaltz	91	67	13	25	50	100	73	81	61	63	63	25	67	55	89	86	100	100
Cooley	53	75	67	55	40	36	36	56	56	78	71	69	47	40	70	63	70	50
Hayton	70	33	14	50	50	63	38	56	64	50	33	50	69	90	54	50	50	44
Stenlund	25	43	33	50	33	50	20	50	43	33	43	33	40	38	100	50	29	29
McBain	38	33	17	40	29	57	29	50	0	40	33	20	43	75	29	40	31	33
Kerfoot	—	40	43	50	50	50	0	100	50	25	40	50	50	29	100	75	50	50
Crouse	72	54	47	67	29	50	44	65	50	54	45	47	45	32	87	71	100	100
Carcone	60	50	38	63	50	63	33	57	0	67	50	50	60	88	45	63	40	38
Keller	85	50	43	63	50	100	64	74	68	50	50	50	54	37	92	90	100	100
Guenther	73	100	56	40	50	50	60	62	72	100	100	71	79	85	64	68	50	40
Peterka	64	100	50	43	30	53	63	69	20	100	100	33	81	80	64	63	33	40
Yamamoto	—	100	50	50	100	50	—	100	60	100	100	60	50	50	100	100	50	50
Sergachev	71	69	30	14	33	50	33	62	63	67	67	43	62	50	70	55	75	50
Marino	81	75	60	69	38	75	73	95	62	75	67	59	82	82	86	68	73	64
Weegar	22	50	25	33	14	17	13	33	0	47	47	0	43	35	43	30	33	0
Schmidt	94	50	71	71	56	69	70	100	73	50	40	82	90	64	88	78	91	86
Cole	45	44	38	67	47	67	56	38	47	50	44	37	44	44	67	67	15	18
Durzi	38	50	17	33	43	40	40	27	29	63	56	27	23	40	50	71	10	13