Florida Panthers vs Calgary Flames — March 20, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Calgary Flames defeated the Florida Panthers 4-1 on March 20, 2026. Expected goals were closely matched at 5-on-5 (CGY 5.09, FLA 5.06), making this a tightly contested game on both sides of the puck. Matvei Gridin was the most dangerous skater with 1.76 individual expected goals on 3 shots at 5-on-5. The Calgary Flames outshot the Florida Panthers 34-24 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Florida Panthers vs Calgary Flames progressed on Mar 20, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

FLA1 - 4CGY

Mar 20, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
CGY	P1	18	15	54.5	15	10	60.0	10	8	55.6	12	12	50.0	5	2	71.4	1.31	0.68	65.7	0	0	—
	P2	16	19	45.7	13	16	44.8	10	8	55.6	9	11	45.0	1	3	25.0	0.89	1.32	40.3	2	0	100.0
	P3	21	18	53.8	18	15	54.5	16	9	64.0	15	11	57.7	7	3	70.0	1.74	0.99	63.7	2	1	66.7
	Total	55	52	51.4	46	41	52.9	36	25	59.0	36	34	51.4	13	8	61.9	3.93	2.99	56.8	4	1	80.0
FLA	P1	15	18	45.5	10	15	40.0	8	10	44.4	12	12	50.0	2	5	28.6	0.68	1.31	34.3	0	0	—
	P2	19	16	54.3	16	13	55.2	8	10	44.4	11	9	55.0	3	1	75.0	1.32	0.89	59.7	0	2	0.0
	P3	18	21	46.2	15	18	45.5	9	16	36.0	11	15	42.3	3	7	30.0	0.99	1.74	36.3	1	2	33.3
	Total	52	55	48.6	41	46	47.1	25	36	41.0	34	36	48.6	8	13	38.1	2.99	3.93	43.2	1	4	20.0

Win Probability

CGY Favored

FLA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

CGY

FLA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

FLA Attempts

CGY Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

FLA ShootCGY Shoot

Goal

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CGY) performed against every skater on the away team (FLA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = CGY players, Columns = FLA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the CGY player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

CGY ↓ / FLA →	Rodrigues	Bennett	Boqvist	Luostarinen	Verhaeghe	Kunin	Hinostroza	Nosek	Greer	Tkachuk	Reinhardt	Foote	Jones	Ekblad	Mikkola	Benning	Sebrango	Kulikov
Frost	71	40	80	60	25	100	100	64	62	25	47	100	83	64	78	45	62	45
Backlund	20	32	83	60	28	75	100	100	100	29	100	50	31	70	57	55	50	67
Sharangovich	40	0	29	36	0	50	50	40	40	0	40	50	38	60	29	0	0	63
Strome	29	40	50	29	0	57	50	50	33	33	40	40	20	69	0	17	17	67
Zary	50	33	50	50	—	57	67	40	40	50	40	40	43	67	33	25	25	64
Pospisil	67	25	0	50	0	0	25	100	100	0	100	0	50	0	50	17	17	0
Coleman	43	41	100	80	33	100	100	100	100	41	100	—	65	71	73	63	79	0
Farabee	29	33	75	50	32	—	0	100	100	26	100	—	45	25	67	36	36	33
Olofsson	0	60	50	0	0	33	0	100	100	33	100	0	25	75	33	40	33	75
Gridin	63	25	75	50	0	33	50	67	63	25	53	50	82	61	78	36	57	47
Coronato	63	25	60	43	0	100	67	67	63	25	53	100	82	69	70	33	57	54
Klapka	50	40	50	50	25	0	17	100	100	0	100	0	50	0	50	33	17	0
Whitecloud	50	31	78	60	33	0	43	100	80	27	100	40	40	69	50	40	36	67
Bahl	47	24	67	55	25	0	60	50	38	28	50	67	36	78	43	32	29	67
Parekh	71	0	100	67	—	43	56	69	67	100	33	43	71	73	64	25	63	50
Määttä	14	20	20	20	11	—	0	55	55	11	55	—	36	33	57	29	29	38
Brzustewicz	0	33	33	0	13	50	0	54	50	20	50	0	38	45	43	33	33	42
Hanley	50	25	50	67	25	29	45	50	50	0	50	38	50	45	67	33	0	44