Game Recap
The Buffalo Sabres shut out the San Jose Sharks 5-0 on March 19, 2026. The Buffalo Sabres controlled play with 45.2% Corsi and generated 7.19 expected goals compared to 6.14 from the San Jose Sharks at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Buffalo Sabres created 13 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the San Jose Sharks at 5-on-5. Sam Carrick scored 2 goals. The San Jose Sharks outshot the Buffalo Sabres 23-16 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Buffalo Sabres vs San Jose Sharks progressed on Mar 19, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
BUF5 - 0SJS
Mar 19, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| SJS | P1 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 7 | 5 | 58.3 | 10 | 13 | 43.5 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 0.78 | 0.92 | 46.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 22 | 11 | 66.7 | 16 | 7 | 69.6 | 10 | 3 | 76.9 | 17 | 9 | 65.4 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 1.58 | 0.77 | 67.3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 14 | 15 | 48.3 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 6 | 8 | 42.9 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 0.64 | 0.96 | 39.9 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 49 | 43 | 53.3 | 34 | 26 | 56.7 | 23 | 16 | 59.0 | 35 | 32 | 52.2 | 7 | 14 | 33.3 | 3.00 | 2.65 | 53.1 | 0 | 5 | 0.0 | |
| BUF | P1 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 5 | 7 | 41.7 | 13 | 10 | 56.5 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 54.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 11 | 22 | 33.3 | 7 | 16 | 30.4 | 3 | 10 | 23.1 | 9 | 17 | 34.6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 0.77 | 1.58 | 32.7 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 15 | 14 | 51.7 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 8 | 6 | 57.1 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 60.1 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 43 | 49 | 46.7 | 26 | 34 | 43.3 | 16 | 23 | 41.0 | 32 | 35 | 47.8 | 14 | 7 | 66.7 | 2.65 | 3.00 | 46.9 | 5 | 0 | 100.0 | |
Win Probability
SJS Favored
BUF Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
SJS
BUF
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
BUF Attempts
SJS Attempts
Individual Event Map
BUF ShootSJS Shoot
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Takeaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (SJS) performed against every skater on the away team (BUF) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = SJS players, Columns = BUF players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the SJS player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| SJS ↓ / BUF → | Thompson | Ostlund | Norris | Krebs | McLeod | Carrick | Zucker | Benson | Malenstyn | Tuch | Quinn | Doan | Byram | Power | Stanley | Samuelsson | Dahlin | Metsa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smith | 47 | 78 | 89 | 57 | 0 | 60 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 89 | 64 | 60 | 57 | 64 | 60 | 50 |
| Wennberg | 57 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 25 | 33 | 60 | 0 | 67 | 50 | 56 | 57 | 55 | 50 | 40 |
| Celebrini | 62 | 55 | 55 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 40 | 33 | 64 | 43 | 67 | 63 | 67 | 62 | 50 | 25 | 62 |
| Misa | 14 | 46 | 86 | 14 | 22 | 13 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 30 | 86 | 30 | 25 | 33 | 50 | 38 | 29 |
| Goodrow | 50 | 0 | 25 | 86 | — | 60 | 67 | 0 | 33 | 75 | 100 | 25 | 67 | 75 | 67 | 57 | 29 | 67 |
| Ostapchuk | 0 | 0 | 20 | 75 | 50 | 67 | 75 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 75 | 20 | 50 | 71 | 0 | 63 | 44 | 0 |
| Toffoli | 0 | — | — | — | 67 | 100 | 100 | 0 | — | 50 | 100 | — | 67 | 100 | 100 | 50 | — | — |
| Sherwood | 60 | 44 | 60 | 38 | 38 | 23 | 50 | 43 | 17 | 29 | 38 | 64 | 38 | 44 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 44 |
| Regenda | 59 | 67 | 33 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 59 | 0 | 33 | 43 | 43 | 63 | 44 | 40 | 71 |
| Eklund | — | 64 | 89 | 40 | 22 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 11 | — | 30 | 89 | 46 | 50 | 30 | 80 | 75 | 33 |
| Graf | 33 | 33 | 45 | 50 | 50 | 83 | 75 | 33 | 50 | 17 | 58 | 60 | 63 | 69 | 40 | 0 | 33 | 33 |
| Gaudette | 25 | 17 | 14 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 50 | 25 | 33 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 67 | 44 | 14 |
| Ferraro | 33 | 45 | 47 | 75 | 38 | 57 | 44 | 33 | 57 | 33 | 33 | 53 | 47 | 59 | 38 | 62 | 40 | 36 |
| Desharnais | 41 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 38 | 57 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 58 | 0 | 46 | 56 | 67 | 40 | 31 | 56 |
| Orlov | 47 | 67 | 80 | 57 | 0 | 70 | 63 | 17 | 25 | 50 | 63 | 80 | 67 | 63 | 58 | 54 | 53 | 50 |
| Dickinson | 50 | 31 | 38 | 56 | 50 | 33 | 57 | 43 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 41 | 45 | 17 | 57 | 56 | 17 |
| Mukhamadullin | 80 | 75 | 86 | 83 | 44 | 33 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 55 | 86 | 71 | 78 | 50 | 71 | 60 | 50 |
| Leddy | 57 | 60 | 88 | 40 | 27 | 11 | 30 | 25 | 11 | 43 | 20 | 89 | 47 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 40 | 38 |
