Florida Panthers vs Edmonton Oilers — March 19, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Edmonton Oilers couldn't find the back of the net as the Florida Panthers cruised to a 4-0 win on March 19, 2026. High-danger chances at 5-on-5: FLA 11, EDM 9. The underlying numbers told a different story — EDM actually held the xG edge (2.88 to 2.31) at 5-on-5, but it didn't matter on the scoreboard. Shots on goal: EDM 21, FLA 23.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Florida Panthers vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Mar 19, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

FLA4 - 0EDM

Mar 19, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
EDM	P1	12	29	29.3	11	20	35.5	8	12	40.0	4	21	16.0	1	10	9.1	0.84	1.46	36.5	0	2	0.0
	P2	20	15	57.1	12	10	54.5	9	5	64.3	18	12	60.0	8	2	80.0	1.20	0.59	66.9	0	1	0.0
	P3	14	12	53.8	12	10	54.5	4	6	40.0	7	8	46.7	1	1	50.0	1.02	0.64	61.6	0	1	0.0
	Total	46	56	45.1	35	40	46.7	21	23	47.7	29	41	41.4	10	13	43.5	3.06	2.69	53.2	0	4	0.0
FLA	P1	29	12	70.7	20	11	64.5	12	8	60.0	21	4	84.0	10	1	90.9	1.46	0.84	63.5	2	0	100.0
	P2	15	20	42.9	10	12	45.5	5	9	35.7	12	18	40.0	2	8	20.0	0.59	1.20	33.1	1	0	100.0
	P3	12	14	46.2	10	12	45.5	6	4	60.0	8	7	53.3	1	1	50.0	0.64	1.02	38.4	1	0	100.0
	Total	56	46	54.9	40	35	53.3	23	21	52.3	41	29	58.6	13	10	56.5	2.69	3.06	46.8	4	0	100.0

Win Probability

EDM Favored

FLA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

EDM

FLA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

FLA Attempts

EDM Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

FLA ShootEDM Shoot

Goal

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Takeaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (FLA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = EDM players, Columns = FLA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

EDM ↓ / FLA →	Bennett	Verhaeghe	Lundell	Rodrigues	Luostarinen	Boqvist	Kunin	Tkachuk	Greer	Reinhardt	Nosek	Samoskevich	Jones	Forsling	Mikkola	Ekblad	Kulikov	Benning
Savoie	53	50	40	17	60	67	67	47	20	50	67	0	38	73	25	64	43	38
McDavid	56	53	60	33	67	80	67	53	40	50	67	0	50	75	29	67	50	60
Nugent-Hopkins	0	0	40	25	80	100	0	0	100	0	75	89	60	71	40	43	0	0
Dickinson	40	100	0	27	—	—	44	33	0	44	0	0	0	67	0	67	33	36
Roslovic	33	29	100	25	100	100	0	22	80	0	—	0	100	50	60	43	17	20
Henrique	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Frederic	0	0	17	0	50	17	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	33	0	100	0	0
Samanski	0	—	0	33	—	—	33	0	0	33	0	0	0	0	0	—	29	29
Hyman	0	0	80	60	80	100	50	0	89	33	86	80	82	71	50	43	25	25
Jones	40	25	0	0	0	0	0	33	0	0	—	0	0	67	0	50	0	0
Podkolzin	56	50	50	0	50	86	50	50	50	43	50	0	58	80	33	70	38	38
Kapanen	25	0	33	45	100	100	50	14	79	50	67	67	85	100	50	50	33	40
Bouchard	64	75	44	50	63	80	80	57	78	80	89	86	69	84	43	69	71	63
Murphy	13	22	8	21	100	20	14	13	67	13	0	40	13	44	11	43	17	17
Nurse	17	22	10	22	100	20	14	23	67	14	0	67	15	44	14	50	20	17
Ekholm	71	69	67	100	75	100	71	60	90	71	89	100	92	88	67	73	67	60
Walman	10	0	0	7	0	60	25	0	23	17	0	0	23	—	17	0	7	9
Stastney	0	0	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	—	0	0	0	0