San Jose Sharks vs Edmonton Oilers — March 17, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

Goals came in bunches as the Edmonton Oilers outlasted the San Jose Sharks 5-3 on March 17, 2026. EDM held a slight 9-8 edge in high-danger chances. SJS won't like the result, but they can take something from the 5-on-5 numbers: 3.44 expected goals to EDM's 2.46. EDM outshot SJS 37-30.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as San Jose Sharks vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Mar 17, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

SJS3 - 5EDM

Mar 17, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
EDM	P1	12	16	42.9	10	12	45.5	10	8	55.6	9	12	42.9	0	2	0.0	0.62	0.93	40.1	3	1	75.0
	P2	22	23	48.9	17	21	44.7	12	15	44.4	15	18	45.5	5	5	50.0	1.19	1.72	41.0	0	2	0.0
	P3	26	19	57.8	17	16	51.5	15	7	68.2	19	10	65.5	7	2	77.8	1.90	1.14	62.4	2	0	100.0
	Total	60	58	50.8	44	49	47.3	37	30	55.2	43	40	51.8	12	9	57.1	3.71	3.78	49.5	5	3	62.5
SJS	P1	16	12	57.1	12	10	54.5	8	10	44.4	12	9	57.1	2	0	100.0	0.93	0.62	59.9	1	3	25.0
	P2	23	22	51.1	21	17	55.3	15	12	55.6	18	15	54.5	5	5	50.0	1.72	1.19	59.0	2	0	100.0
	P3	19	26	42.2	16	17	48.5	7	15	31.8	10	19	34.5	2	7	22.2	1.14	1.90	37.6	0	2	0.0
	Total	58	60	49.2	49	44	52.7	30	37	44.8	40	43	48.2	9	12	42.9	3.78	3.71	50.5	3	5	37.5

Win Probability

EDM Favored

SJS Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

EDM

SJS

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

SJS Attempts

EDM Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

SJS ShootEDM Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (SJS) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = EDM players, Columns = SJS players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

EDM ↓ / SJS →	Celebrini	Wennberg	Misa	Toffoli	Smith	Goodrow	Ostapchuk	Sherwood	Regenda	Eklund	Graf	Gaudette	Ferraro	Desharnais	Dickinson	Orlov	Klingberg	Leddy
McDavid	39	73	57	100	33	91	90	10	50	50	54	33	67	50	60	60	69	0
Nugent-Hopkins	38	69	50	56	50	100	100	41	50	56	60	50	83	80	68	45	45	46
Roslovic	43	60	44	50	60	100	100	41	50	50	33	50	73	60	53	45	45	50
Dickinson	21	43	44	46	38	100	100	18	50	50	14	67	67	50	33	38	40	43
Savoie	50	90	58	100	44	90	90	20	50	67	65	33	72	56	89	71	69	—
Samanski	75	60	83	75	50	80	75	60	60	75	80	50	100	100	86	40	40	75
Henrique	100	50	50	30	100	100	100	50	44	25	100	43	50	67	50	78	75	36
Frederic	75	67	38	38	100	100	100	40	40	38	67	33	50	57	50	83	83	43
Hyman	35	67	54	100	27	90	90	0	0	33	52	33	63	45	57	57	67	0
Jones	75	33	29	14	100	100	100	0	0	17	67	33	40	40	43	75	75	43
Podkolzin	50	53	80	57	0	50	50	45	45	57	50	38	71	80	62	40	40	50
Kapanen	50	46	83	50	0	50	50	50	50	55	67	33	100	100	71	40	36	50
Bouchard	42	62	67	50	33	90	90	14	25	67	59	25	75	63	62	63	59	0
Nurse	33	55	50	50	43	83	75	38	45	44	25	33	42	75	43	44	50	36
Murphy	50	55	50	50	67	83	67	38	45	44	20	33	50	86	38	50	57	33
Ekholm	39	50	67	50	27	50	50	14	40	67	47	40	50	45	0	60	56	20
Walman	44	57	40	47	67	100	100	33	50	44	60	55	64	22	67	50	50	64
Stastney	38	57	40	47	50	100	100	33	50	44	67	55	64	22	69	47	47	67