Utah Mammoth vs Dallas Stars — March 16, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

Goals came in bunches as the Utah Mammoth outlasted the Dallas Stars 6-3 on March 16, 2026. UTA had a big edge in high-danger chances, 7-3 over DAL at 5-on-5. The expected goals were nearly even at 5-on-5 — DAL 6.13, UTA 6.14. DAL outshot UTA 30-22.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Dallas Stars progressed on Mar 16, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA6 - 3DAL

Mar 16, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
DAL	P1	16	13	55.2	14	5	73.7	10	2	83.3	10	7	58.8	3	2	60.0	3.38	0.72	82.5	1	1	50.0
	P2	17	16	51.5	14	11	56.0	10	11	47.6	10	10	50.0	1	1	50.0	2.65	2.16	55.1	1	1	50.0
	P3	14	17	45.2	13	12	52.0	10	9	52.6	8	13	38.1	1	5	16.7	2.78	4.16	40.1	1	4	20.0
	Total	47	46	50.5	41	28	59.4	30	22	57.7	28	30	48.3	5	8	38.5	8.81	7.04	55.6	3	6	33.3
UTA	P1	13	16	44.8	5	14	26.3	2	10	16.7	7	10	41.2	2	3	40.0	0.72	3.38	17.5	1	1	50.0
	P2	16	17	48.5	11	14	44.0	11	10	52.4	10	10	50.0	1	1	50.0	2.16	2.65	44.9	1	1	50.0
	P3	17	14	54.8	12	13	48.0	9	10	47.4	13	8	61.9	5	1	83.3	4.16	2.78	59.9	4	1	80.0
	Total	46	47	49.5	28	41	40.6	22	30	42.3	30	28	51.7	8	5	61.5	7.04	8.81	44.4	6	3	66.7

Win Probability

DAL Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

DAL

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

DAL Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootDAL Shoot

Goal

Missed Shot

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (DAL) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = DAL players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the DAL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

DAL ↓ / UTA →	Schmaltz	Cooley	Kerfoot	Hayton	McBain	Crouse	Carcone	Tanev	Keller	Guenther	Peterka	Yamamoto	Weegar	Sergachev	Schmidt	Marino	Cole	Durzi
Johnston	63	50	50	33	33	50	33	—	20	50	50	—	38	50	50	33	55	67
Duchene	86	46	43	67	100	86	67	0	75	50	42	33	45	50	63	50	80	57
Bourque	33	63	67	29	29	40	29	—	40	57	57	—	57	50	43	30	38	67
Steel	50	36	33	67	100	67	67	0	67	40	30	33	38	33	43	43	60	50
Blackwell	45	—	100	0	0	25	0	100	45	100	—	100	40	40	—	—	63	63
Hryckowian	43	100	100	0	0	20	0	100	50	100	—	100	50	55	—	—	80	75
Bäck	50	80	50	50	100	50	50	50	50	80	80	33	67	0	80	0	75	75
Benn	83	42	43	67	100	83	67	0	67	45	36	33	40	50	57	50	78	50
Robertson	63	67	50	29	29	50	29	—	20	67	67	—	43	56	50	33	55	67
Bunting	50	100	100	0	0	33	0	100	56	100	—	100	50	55	—	—	71	67
Erne	—	75	50	50	100	—	50	50	—	75	75	33	60	0	75	0	100	100
Hyry	50	67	50	25	33	50	25	50	50	67	67	33	50	0	50	0	60	60
Heiskanen	73	33	60	67	75	63	67	0	57	55	33	40	33	47	43	43	100	100
Harley	38	56	75	0	0	25	0	80	40	67	50	57	46	46	20	0	64	67
Lindell	60	50	57	50	75	67	50	0	71	50	33	50	33	38	67	67	100	100
Myers	50	25	50	33	29	60	33	100	60	25	0	100	40	25	50	38	33	50
Lundkvist	17	78	57	0	0	14	0	67	14	78	78	57	53	33	71	0	40	50
Bichsel	50	57	50	40	40	50	40	50	50	57	57	50	86	33	67	33	33	29