Game Recap
The Edmonton Oilers defeated the Nashville Predators 3-1 on March 15, 2026. The Edmonton Oilers controlled play with 52.2% Corsi and generated 8.24 expected goals compared to 4.28 from the Nashville Predators at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Edmonton Oilers created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 3 from the Nashville Predators at 5-on-5. Jason Dickinson was the most dangerous skater with 1.68 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Edmonton Oilers outshot the Nashville Predators 30-29 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Nashville Predators vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Mar 15, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NSH1 - 3EDM
Mar 15, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| EDM | P1 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 15 | 9 | 62.5 | 11 | 7 | 61.1 | 13 | 10 | 56.5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 3.76 | 1.68 | 69.1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 19 | 16 | 54.3 | 14 | 13 | 51.9 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5 | 5.35 | 2.06 | 72.1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 15 | 26 | 36.6 | 13 | 23 | 36.1 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 10 | 17 | 37.0 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 2.67 | 4.67 | 36.4 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 51 | 55 | 48.1 | 42 | 45 | 48.3 | 30 | 27 | 52.6 | 37 | 39 | 48.7 | 14 | 7 | 66.7 | 11.78 | 8.42 | 58.3 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| NSH | P1 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 9 | 15 | 37.5 | 7 | 11 | 38.9 | 10 | 13 | 43.5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 1.68 | 3.76 | 30.9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 16 | 19 | 45.7 | 13 | 14 | 48.1 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 1 | 7 | 12.5 | 2.06 | 5.35 | 27.9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 26 | 15 | 63.4 | 23 | 13 | 63.9 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 17 | 10 | 63.0 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 4.67 | 2.67 | 63.6 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 55 | 51 | 51.9 | 45 | 42 | 51.7 | 27 | 30 | 47.4 | 39 | 37 | 51.3 | 7 | 14 | 33.3 | 8.42 | 11.78 | 41.7 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
Win Probability
EDM Favored
NSH Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
EDM
NSH
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NSH Attempts
EDM Attempts
Individual Event Map
NSH ShootEDM Shoot
Shot on Net
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (NSH) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = EDM players, Columns = NSH players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| EDM ↓ / NSH → | O'Reilly | Jost | Svechkov | Stamkos | Wiesblatt | Haula | Forsberg | L'Heureux | Schaefer | Marchessault | Evangelista | Wood | Josi | Skjei | Hague | Perbix | Barron | Ufko |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDavid | 63 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 71 | 56 | 50 | 60 | 71 | 75 | 50 | 71 | 50 | 76 | 33 | 73 | 56 | 75 |
| Nugent-Hopkins | 50 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 67 | 29 | 33 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 56 | 77 | 25 | 55 | 57 | 0 |
| Dickinson | 20 | 50 | 78 | 20 | 83 | 67 | 25 | 67 | 75 | 20 | 33 | 50 | 58 | 57 | 60 | 0 | 71 | — |
| Roslovic | 50 | 33 | 43 | 33 | 57 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 57 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 30 | 0 | 50 | — |
| Henrique | 0 | 80 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 83 | 14 | 67 | 100 | 14 | 50 | 100 | 40 | 75 | 75 | 80 | 50 | 100 |
| Samanski | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 57 | 40 | 0 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 63 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 40 |
| Savoie | 40 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 14 | 80 | 100 | 14 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 80 | 100 |
| Frederic | 0 | 83 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 71 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 33 | 86 | 80 | 67 | 100 |
| Draisaitl | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 100 | — | 100 | 50 | 100 | 67 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Hyman | 83 | 75 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 70 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 80 | 75 | 92 | 57 | 89 | 75 | 100 |
| Podkolzin | 80 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 80 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 80 | 75 | 100 | 67 | 75 |
| Kapanen | 100 | 33 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 50 |
| Bouchard | 63 | 60 | 33 | 50 | 75 | 71 | 50 | 60 | 71 | 60 | 71 | 83 | 50 | 93 | 33 | 82 | 56 | 100 |
| Nurse | 18 | 50 | 100 | 18 | 100 | 50 | 10 | 50 | 100 | 11 | 43 | 50 | 53 | 64 | 60 | 20 | 80 | 0 |
| Ekholm | 50 | 67 | 33 | 43 | 60 | 83 | 33 | 57 | 71 | 50 | 57 | 75 | 50 | 78 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 100 |
| Murphy | 20 | 60 | 100 | 20 | 100 | 56 | 10 | 60 | 100 | 11 | 50 | 50 | 53 | 70 | 67 | 33 | 80 | 0 |
| Walman | 50 | 57 | 33 | 0 | 75 | 67 | 67 | 33 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 57 | 57 | 40 | 50 | 75 | 60 |
| Stastney | 0 | 71 | 33 | 0 | 75 | 83 | 67 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 0 | 67 | 57 | 40 | 60 | 100 | 75 | 50 |
