Game Recap
The Pittsburgh Penguins defeated the Utah Mammoth 4-3 on March 14, 2026. Despite the result, the Utah Mammoth held the edge in expected goals (6.67 to 4.25) at 5-on-5, indicating the Pittsburgh Penguins received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Utah Mammoth created 6 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the Pittsburgh Penguins at 5-on-5. Dylan Guenther scored 2 goals. The Utah Mammoth outshot the Pittsburgh Penguins 29-23 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Mar 14, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
PIT4 - 3UTA
Mar 14, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| UTA | P1 | 21 | 14 | 60.0 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 4.03 | 1.99 | 66.9 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 14 | 9 | 60.9 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 3.05 | 1.02 | 75.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 27 | 13 | 67.5 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 22 | 10 | 68.8 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 4.02 | 2.38 | 62.8 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 68 | 42 | 61.8 | 47 | 33 | 58.8 | 29 | 23 | 55.8 | 49 | 29 | 62.8 | 12 | 7 | 63.2 | 11.10 | 5.39 | 67.3 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
| PIT | P1 | 14 | 21 | 40.0 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 1.99 | 4.03 | 33.1 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 9 | 14 | 39.1 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 1.02 | 3.05 | 25.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 13 | 27 | 32.5 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 10 | 22 | 31.3 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 2.38 | 4.02 | 37.2 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 42 | 68 | 38.2 | 33 | 47 | 41.3 | 23 | 29 | 44.2 | 29 | 49 | 37.2 | 7 | 12 | 36.8 | 5.39 | 11.10 | 32.7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
Win Probability
UTA Favored
PIT Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
UTA
PIT
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
PIT Attempts
UTA Attempts
Individual Event Map
PIT ShootUTA Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = UTA players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| UTA ↓ / PIT → | Acciari | Novak | Dewar | Lizotte | Kindel | Soderblom | Rakell | Chinakhov | Mantha | Rust | Koivunen | Hayes | Karlsson | Letang | Wotherspoon | Shea | Clifton | Solovyov |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmaltz | 69 | 67 | 69 | 58 | 100 | 100 | 27 | 44 | 20 | 38 | 50 | 100 | 44 | 67 | 64 | 89 | 88 | 75 |
| Hayton | 67 | 50 | 67 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 69 | 56 | 40 | 56 | 50 | 100 | 56 | 71 | 56 | 80 | 100 | 100 |
| Cooley | 70 | 20 | 73 | 73 | — | — | 100 | — | 14 | — | 20 | — | 69 | 25 | 64 | 25 | 11 | 11 |
| McBain | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 33 | 25 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 42 | 80 | 71 | 80 | 100 | 100 |
| Stenlund | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 40 | 57 | 50 | 38 | 20 | 38 | 33 | 67 | 50 | 29 | 75 | 33 | 60 | 50 |
| Kerfoot | 50 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 36 | 30 | 29 | 30 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 40 | 80 | 67 | 67 | 50 |
| Crouse | 54 | 33 | 44 | 45 | 57 | 25 | 17 | 40 | 20 | 29 | 0 | 50 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 44 | 50 | 50 |
| Carcone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 69 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 100 |
| Guenther | 79 | 20 | 80 | 75 | — | — | 100 | 100 | 14 | 100 | 20 | — | 71 | 40 | 67 | 63 | 43 | 20 |
| Keller | 71 | 67 | 71 | 58 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 64 | 86 | 64 | 90 | 90 | 83 |
| Peterka | 67 | 24 | 70 | 73 | — | — | 100 | 100 | 19 | 100 | 24 | — | 71 | 25 | 67 | 25 | 18 | 18 |
| Yamamoto | 33 | 40 | 33 | 0 | 50 | 67 | 71 | 60 | 40 | 60 | 40 | 67 | 57 | 40 | 57 | 40 | 60 | 50 |
| Sergachev | 73 | 67 | 71 | 67 | 86 | 83 | 46 | 53 | 44 | 53 | 60 | 100 | 63 | 83 | 71 | 100 | 75 | 50 |
| Schmidt | 70 | 9 | 73 | 70 | 100 | 100 | 48 | 27 | 10 | 27 | 9 | 100 | 42 | 38 | 62 | 40 | 56 | 53 |
| Weegar | 44 | 57 | 44 | 44 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 29 | 21 | 29 | 50 | 100 | 52 | 50 | 65 | 67 | 33 | 33 |
| Cole | 67 | 38 | 67 | 67 | 63 | 50 | 43 | 55 | 27 | 50 | 38 | 60 | 45 | 58 | 63 | 60 | 50 | 50 |
| Marino | 45 | 8 | 50 | 45 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 40 | 8 | 40 | 8 | 100 | 55 | 17 | 55 | 17 | 53 | 50 |
| Durzi | 43 | 50 | 40 | 33 | 71 | 60 | 67 | 60 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 100 |
