Game Recap
The Columbus Blue Jackets came away with a 5-2 victory over the Tampa Bay Lightning on March 10, 2026. Garland put up 2 goals. Monahan was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 3.03 individual expected goals on 5 shots. CBJ had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 8.80 xG against 2.82 while holding 53.3% of shot attempts. Shots on goal: TBL 18, CBJ 32.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Columbus Blue Jackets vs Tampa Bay Lightning progressed on Mar 10, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CBJ5 - 2TBL
Mar 10, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| TBL | P1 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 4 | 9 | 30.8 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 2.68 | 2.97 | 47.4 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 17 | 54.1 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 16 | 14 | 53.3 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 1.80 | 4.26 | 29.7 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| P3 | 12 | 20 | 37.5 | 7 | 17 | 29.2 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 7 | 12 | 36.8 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 1.13 | 3.57 | 24.1 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 47 | 52 | 47.5 | 29 | 44 | 39.7 | 18 | 32 | 36.0 | 36 | 39 | 48.0 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 5.61 | 10.81 | 34.2 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | |
| CBJ | P1 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 9 | 4 | 69.2 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 2.97 | 2.68 | 52.6 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 20 | 45.9 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 14 | 16 | 46.7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 4.26 | 1.80 | 70.3 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| P3 | 20 | 12 | 62.5 | 17 | 7 | 70.8 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 12 | 7 | 63.2 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 3.57 | 1.13 | 75.9 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 52 | 47 | 52.5 | 44 | 29 | 60.3 | 32 | 18 | 64.0 | 39 | 36 | 52.0 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 10.81 | 5.61 | 65.8 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | |
Win Probability
TBL Favored
CBJ Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
TBL
CBJ
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CBJ Attempts
TBL Attempts
Individual Event Map
CBJ ShootTBL Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (TBL) performed against every skater on the away team (CBJ) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = TBL players, Columns = CBJ players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the TBL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| TBL ↓ / CBJ → | Fantilli | Coyle | Monahan | Jenner | Lundeström | Sillinger | Johnson | Marchment | Heinen | Marchenko | Garland | Olivier | Provorov | Werenski | Severson | Mateychuk | Fabbro | Christiansen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cirelli | 42 | 44 | 56 | 86 | 75 | 67 | 36 | 17 | 86 | 50 | 30 | 100 | 42 | 56 | 100 | 22 | 87 | 100 |
| Point | 17 | 73 | 65 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 30 | 0 | 50 | 20 | 36 | 0 | 53 | 0 | 44 | 33 | 91 | 43 |
| Guentzel | 17 | 75 | 65 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 30 | 17 | 33 | 20 | 36 | 0 | 53 | 33 | 38 | 29 | 90 | 33 |
| Gourde | 17 | 36 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 50 | 17 | 0 | 44 | 33 | 27 | 29 | 33 | 33 | 33 |
| Goncalves | 40 | 67 | 60 | 80 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 75 | 63 | 33 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 67 | 25 | 75 | 67 |
| Girgensons | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 33 | 13 | 17 | 40 | 50 | 33 |
| Geekie | 0 | 100 | 0 | 40 | 40 | — | 0 | 25 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 23 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 100 | 0 |
| Hagel | 38 | 50 | 59 | 86 | 75 | 57 | 36 | 17 | 86 | 47 | 30 | 100 | 46 | 53 | 100 | 20 | 82 | 100 |
| Kucherov | 44 | 89 | 62 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 36 | 33 | 67 | 50 | 36 | — | 50 | 67 | 60 | 31 | 88 | 50 |
| Bjorkstrand | 0 | 100 | 88 | 42 | 46 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 50 | 40 | 57 | 29 | 100 | 0 |
| Perry | 14 | 100 | 83 | 57 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 54 | 75 | 0 | 40 | 44 | 67 | 60 | 31 | 100 | 50 |
| Holmberg | — | 44 | 0 | — | — | — | 0 | 44 | — | — | 0 | 44 | 50 | 25 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 33 |
| D'Astous | 20 | 58 | 52 | 69 | 64 | 67 | 39 | 21 | 64 | 63 | 39 | 33 | 36 | 69 | 42 | 26 | 93 | 50 |
| Hedman | 40 | 71 | 67 | 46 | 42 | 67 | 42 | 33 | 40 | 33 | 46 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 64 | 29 | 82 | 83 |
| McDonagh | 15 | 20 | 20 | 67 | 63 | 67 | 20 | 16 | 67 | 27 | 0 | 33 | 21 | 43 | 75 | 25 | 100 | 67 |
| Carlile | 29 | 33 | 13 | 67 | 50 | 40 | 11 | 33 | 67 | 29 | 11 | 50 | 22 | 25 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 33 |
| Moser | 27 | 33 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 50 | 30 | 0 | 50 | 29 | 27 | 29 | 43 | 80 | 33 |
| Santini | 100 | 33 | 0 | 38 | 29 | 100 | 0 | 33 | 38 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 17 | 100 | 80 |
