Game Recap
The Buffalo Sabres defeated the San Jose Sharks 6-3 on March 10, 2026. The Buffalo Sabres controlled play with 53.6% Corsi and generated 10.89 expected goals compared to 5.75 from the San Jose Sharks at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Buffalo Sabres created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 7 from the San Jose Sharks at 5-on-5. Jack Quinn recorded a hat trick with 3 goals. Josh Doan was the most dangerous skater with 1.53 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Buffalo Sabres outshot the San Jose Sharks 26-21 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as San Jose Sharks vs Buffalo Sabres progressed on Mar 10, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
SJS3 - 6BUF
Mar 10, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| BUF | P1 | 18 | 15 | 54.5 | 12 | 11 | 52.2 | 8 | 5 | 61.5 | 11 | 11 | 50.0 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 3.27 | 2.46 | 57.0 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
| P2 | 25 | 20 | 55.6 | 18 | 14 | 56.3 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 16 | 15 | 51.6 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 5.37 | 4.02 | 57.2 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 12 | 19 | 38.7 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 6 | 8 | 42.9 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 2.42 | 1.61 | 60.1 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 55 | 54 | 50.5 | 39 | 38 | 50.6 | 26 | 21 | 55.3 | 35 | 37 | 48.6 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 11.05 | 8.09 | 57.8 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | |
| SJS | P1 | 15 | 18 | 45.5 | 11 | 12 | 47.8 | 5 | 8 | 38.5 | 11 | 11 | 50.0 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 2.46 | 3.27 | 43.0 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 |
| P2 | 20 | 25 | 44.4 | 14 | 18 | 43.8 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 15 | 16 | 48.4 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 4.02 | 5.37 | 42.8 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 19 | 12 | 61.3 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 8 | 6 | 57.1 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 1.61 | 2.42 | 39.9 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 54 | 55 | 49.5 | 38 | 39 | 49.4 | 21 | 26 | 44.7 | 37 | 35 | 51.4 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 8.09 | 11.05 | 42.2 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
BUF Favored
SJS Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
BUF
SJS
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
SJS Attempts
BUF Attempts
Individual Event Map
SJS ShootBUF Shoot
Missed Shot
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (BUF) performed against every skater on the away team (SJS) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = BUF players, Columns = SJS players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the BUF player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| BUF ↓ / SJS → | Celebrini | Smith | Wennberg | Toffoli | Misa | Kurashev | Goodrow | Ostapchuk | Sherwood | Eklund | Graf | Gaudette | Klingberg | Orlov | Dickinson | Ferraro | Desharnais | Mukhamadullin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrick | 31 | 14 | 60 | 30 | 57 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 20 | 88 | 47 | 54 | 70 | 60 | 63 | 50 |
| Krebs | 25 | 0 | 80 | 27 | 40 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 86 | 38 | 0 | 75 | 40 | 40 | 38 | 40 | 38 | 40 |
| McLeod | 38 | 29 | 75 | 25 | 67 | 89 | 50 | 75 | 88 | 40 | 50 | 75 | 38 | 50 | 80 | 67 | 75 | 67 |
| Thompson | 60 | 64 | 75 | 29 | 44 | 75 | — | — | 75 | 38 | 67 | — | 88 | 88 | 42 | 50 | 42 | 43 |
| Norris | 75 | 80 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 50 | 83 | 0 | 78 | 78 | 0 | 75 | 40 | 86 |
| Ostlund | 73 | 75 | 67 | — | 100 | 67 | — | — | 67 | 0 | 80 | — | 82 | 82 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 75 |
| Benson | 58 | 62 | 83 | 50 | 57 | 83 | 100 | 100 | 83 | 40 | 64 | 100 | 71 | 71 | 70 | 63 | 67 | 67 |
| Malenstyn | 44 | 33 | 50 | 30 | 57 | 100 | 86 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 88 | 64 | 78 | 70 | 75 | 63 | 50 |
| Zucker | 60 | 50 | 88 | 50 | 50 | 88 | 0 | 67 | 86 | 50 | 60 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 78 | 75 | 75 |
| Tuch | 30 | 33 | 56 | 30 | 44 | 75 | — | — | 67 | 33 | 50 | — | 50 | 67 | 33 | 44 | 33 | 50 |
| Quinn | 50 | 40 | 88 | 50 | 50 | 88 | 0 | 50 | 88 | 33 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 60 | 60 | 67 |
| Doan | 73 | 80 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 82 | 0 | 75 | 75 | 0 | 67 | 25 | 83 |
| Samuelsson | 42 | 48 | 36 | 14 | 67 | 63 | 80 | 100 | 56 | 33 | 59 | 83 | 43 | 50 | 55 | 70 | 44 | 71 |
| Dahlin | 60 | 57 | 78 | 50 | 60 | 75 | 67 | 80 | 78 | 40 | 75 | 75 | 71 | 71 | 62 | 70 | 54 | 71 |
| Byram | 62 | 71 | 73 | 0 | 100 | 83 | — | 100 | 77 | 40 | 75 | 100 | 61 | 65 | 50 | 90 | 40 | 90 |
| Power | 50 | 43 | 69 | 33 | 67 | 90 | — | 100 | 91 | 67 | 58 | 100 | 47 | 58 | 67 | 82 | 75 | 91 |
| Stanley | 0 | 20 | 100 | 36 | 47 | 100 | 67 | 67 | 100 | 40 | 25 | 67 | 83 | 100 | 40 | 14 | 40 | 14 |
| Kesselring | 0 | 25 | 100 | 33 | 43 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 38 | 25 | 60 | 80 | 80 | 50 | 0 | 42 | 0 |
