Utah Mammoth vs Chicago Blackhawks — March 9, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Chicago Blackhawks defeated the Utah Mammoth 3-2 in overtime on March 9, 2026. The Chicago Blackhawks controlled play with 51.1% Corsi and generated 7.54 expected goals compared to 5.56 from the Utah Mammoth at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Chicago Blackhawks created 9 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the Utah Mammoth at 5-on-5. Connor Bedard was the most dangerous skater with 1.61 individual expected goals on 3 shots at 5-on-5. The Chicago Blackhawks outshot the Utah Mammoth 26-24 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Chicago Blackhawks progressed on Mar 9, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA2 - 3CHI (OT)

Mar 9, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
CHI	P1	12	15	44.4	12	9	57.1	8	6	57.1	6	13	31.6	1	3	25.0	2.15	2.18	49.7	1	2	33.3
	P2	21	18	53.8	17	13	56.7	11	9	55.0	16	11	59.3	6	2	75.0	3.72	1.99	65.2	1	0	100.0
	P3	19	19	50.0	13	13	50.0	6	8	42.9	11	14	44.0	2	3	40.0	2.15	2.94	42.3	0	0	—
	OT	3	3	50.0	2	2	50.0	1	2	33.3	2	3	40.0	1	0	100.0	0.25	0.39	39.0	1	0	100.0
	Total	55	55	50.0	44	37	54.3	26	25	51.0	35	41	46.1	10	8	55.6	8.27	7.50	52.5	3	2	60.0
UTA	P1	15	12	55.6	9	12	42.9	6	8	42.9	13	6	68.4	3	1	75.0	2.18	2.15	50.3	2	1	66.7
	P2	18	21	46.2	13	17	43.3	9	11	45.0	11	16	40.7	2	6	25.0	1.99	3.72	34.8	0	1	0.0
	P3	19	19	50.0	13	13	50.0	8	6	57.1	14	11	56.0	3	2	60.0	2.94	2.15	57.7	0	0	—
	OT	3	3	50.0	2	2	50.0	2	1	66.7	3	2	60.0	0	1	0.0	0.39	0.25	61.0	0	1	0.0
	Total	55	55	50.0	37	44	45.7	25	26	49.0	41	35	53.9	8	10	44.4	7.50	8.27	47.5	2	3	40.0

Win Probability

CHI Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

CHI

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

CHI Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootCHI Shoot

Shot on Net

Attempt Blocked

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CHI) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = CHI players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the CHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

CHI ↓ / UTA →	Schmaltz	Stenlund	Kerfoot	Cooley	Hayton	McBain	Crouse	Carcone	Keller	Guenther	Peterka	Yamamoto	Marino	Schmidt	Durzi	Weegar	Cole	DeSimone
Bedard	93	50	40	67	100	80	58	33	100	100	64	100	78	91	71	43	79	100
Greene	71	14	14	58	100	83	50	0	78	71	58	100	50	56	50	29	88	100
Donato	58	50	0	50	100	—	67	0	52	52	50	100	53	56	57	45	57	0
Nazar	71	57	50	50	44	42	40	80	67	67	43	50	50	63	42	50	60	63
Teravainen	83	25	0	36	55	30	14	43	100	100	30	38	33	29	54	43	40	50
Lafferty	0	20	20	—	75	67	100	20	0	0	—	75	20	20	0	0	57	50
Burakovsky	80	25	25	64	100	83	60	20	100	100	64	100	57	67	53	38	89	100
Mangiapane	55	0	0	67	100	—	67	0	57	57	50	100	64	58	50	63	50	50
Bertuzzi	75	57	50	50	44	42	25	80	100	100	43	50	50	57	40	50	57	63
Slaggert	33	25	25	0	75	75	0	18	33	33	0	75	29	17	33	0	57	57
Lardis	25	22	22	—	50	50	—	25	33	33	—	50	29	20	33	0	40	40
Mikheyev	63	0	0	67	100	—	67	0	62	62	50	100	61	56	67	50	50	50
Rinzel	60	27	10	58	83	71	50	22	67	60	58	83	33	58	54	31	63	67
Vlasic	63	0	0	67	86	0	67	0	62	62	50	67	58	53	64	56	50	40
Crevier	69	50	50	75	100	—	67	33	69	68	67	100	65	56	71	55	60	75
Kaiser	60	20	20	47	83	75	38	27	67	60	47	83	43	38	50	36	64	70
Levshunov	50	25	25	33	50	46	0	33	50	50	25	55	50	29	31	43	56	56
Grzelcyk	100	33	33	63	60	53	50	50	100	100	57	64	67	50	42	50	67	78