Game Recap
After a back-and-forth affair, the Utah Mammoth pulled out a 5-4 win in overtime on Saturday. Logan Cooley had a 2-goal game. Dig into the 5-on-5 data, and CBJ had the better of it (8.49 xG to 6.80). Sometimes the bounces just don't go your way. Keep an eye on Marchment — 1.95 individual xG on 4 shots at 5-on-5. CBJ outshot UTA 31-23.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Columbus Blue Jackets progressed on Mar 7, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
UTA5 - 4CBJ (OT)
Mar 7, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CBJ | P1 | 24 | 21 | 53.3 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 6 | 11 | 35.3 | 15 | 14 | 51.7 | 6 | 4 | 60.0 | 1.89 | 3.19 | 37.1 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 25 | 10 | 71.4 | 17 | 7 | 70.8 | 11 | 4 | 73.3 | 19 | 6 | 76.0 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 4.13 | 1.44 | 74.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 23 | 18 | 56.1 | 15 | 16 | 48.4 | 13 | 7 | 65.0 | 16 | 7 | 69.6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 3.45 | 2.88 | 54.5 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.14 | 0.38 | 27.4 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 73 | 50 | 59.3 | 46 | 39 | 54.1 | 31 | 23 | 57.4 | 51 | 28 | 64.6 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 9.61 | 7.89 | 54.9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | |
| UTA | P1 | 21 | 24 | 46.7 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 11 | 6 | 64.7 | 14 | 15 | 48.3 | 4 | 6 | 40.0 | 3.19 | 1.89 | 62.9 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 10 | 25 | 28.6 | 7 | 17 | 29.2 | 4 | 11 | 26.7 | 6 | 19 | 24.0 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 1.44 | 4.13 | 25.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 23 | 43.9 | 16 | 15 | 51.6 | 7 | 13 | 35.0 | 7 | 16 | 30.4 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 2.88 | 3.45 | 45.5 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 72.6 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 50 | 73 | 40.7 | 39 | 46 | 45.9 | 23 | 31 | 42.6 | 28 | 51 | 35.4 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 7.89 | 9.61 | 45.1 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | |
Win Probability
CBJ Favored
UTA Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CBJ
UTA
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
UTA Attempts
CBJ Attempts
Individual Event Map
UTA ShootCBJ Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CBJ) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CBJ players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CBJ player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CBJ ↓ / UTA → | Schmaltz | Cooley | Hayton | McBain | Stenlund | Kerfoot | Crouse | Carcone | Guenther | Keller | Yamamoto | Peterka | Durzi | Schmidt | Weegar | Marino | Cole | DeSimone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fantilli | 50 | 50 | 63 | 54 | 50 | 100 | 53 | 50 | 29 | 29 | 71 | 61 | 45 | 65 | 46 | 62 | 63 | 50 |
| Johnson | 57 | 46 | 38 | 30 | 50 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 57 | 57 | 40 | 33 | 63 | 40 | 71 | 40 | 38 | 35 |
| Coyle | 42 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 60 | 67 | 75 | 56 | 36 | 36 | 67 | 67 | 44 | 64 | 50 | 64 | 63 | 40 |
| Sillinger | 33 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 63 | 63 | 60 | 63 | 33 | 33 | 100 | 60 | 36 | 67 | 36 | 67 | 63 | 50 |
| Monahan | 67 | 50 | 43 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 44 | 50 | 71 | 60 | 83 | 60 | 36 | 33 |
| Jenner | 60 | 78 | 25 | 33 | 83 | 83 | 78 | 88 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 70 | 33 | 70 | 88 | 83 |
| Lundeström | 67 | 100 | 33 | 0 | 83 | 83 | 100 | 86 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 71 | 60 | 78 | 50 | 78 | 100 | 100 |
| Marchment | 67 | 53 | 63 | 54 | 50 | 100 | 56 | 67 | 43 | 33 | 71 | 63 | 55 | 67 | 50 | 64 | 67 | 50 |
| Wood | 60 | 75 | 50 | 0 | 83 | 83 | 86 | 88 | 60 | 50 | 100 | 67 | 44 | 88 | 29 | 88 | 100 | 100 |
| Marchenko | 50 | 53 | 63 | 58 | 67 | 100 | 56 | 50 | 29 | 29 | 71 | 63 | 45 | 67 | 46 | 67 | 63 | 50 |
| Garland | 57 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 40 | 33 | 71 | 33 | 83 | 33 | 38 | 35 |
| Olivier | 40 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 63 | 63 | 67 | 63 | 40 | 40 | 100 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 57 | 40 |
| Severson | 50 | 53 | 43 | 40 | 100 | 100 | 56 | 100 | 46 | 50 | 50 | 53 | 40 | 67 | 43 | 67 | 69 | 69 |
| Werenski | 50 | 52 | 63 | 44 | 100 | 100 | 52 | 100 | 43 | 42 | 71 | 47 | 43 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 69 |
| Provorov | 38 | 67 | 77 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 69 | 50 | 38 | 38 | 73 | 75 | 58 | 72 | 58 | 72 | 56 | 56 |
| Mateychuk | 29 | 67 | 71 | 73 | 50 | 67 | 69 | 50 | 22 | 22 | 79 | 75 | 60 | 68 | 50 | 68 | 63 | 50 |
| Gudbranson | 71 | 33 | 14 | 0 | 25 | 29 | 50 | 40 | 71 | 67 | 17 | 33 | 60 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 22 | 0 |
| Zamula | 60 | 75 | 27 | 0 | 14 | 17 | 100 | 33 | 43 | 33 | 38 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 38 | 40 | 33 | 18 |
