Game Recap
The Carolina Hurricanes prevailed 6-3 in a high-scoring affair against the Edmonton Oilers on March 6, 2026. Hyman put up 2 goals. The expected goals were nearly even at 5-on-5 — EDM 6.52, CAR 6.22. High-danger chances at 5-on-5: EDM 10, CAR 8. Jackson Blake found the net 2 times. CAR peppered the net with 32 shots to EDM's 16.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Carolina Hurricanes vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Mar 6, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CAR6 - 3EDM
Mar 6, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| EDM | P1 | 9 | 20 | 31.0 | 5 | 15 | 25.0 | 3 | 8 | 27.3 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 1.52 | 2.29 | 39.9 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 |
| P2 | 17 | 32 | 34.7 | 16 | 22 | 42.1 | 9 | 18 | 33.3 | 8 | 23 | 25.8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 3.71 | 4.36 | 46.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 12 | 16 | 42.9 | 7 | 12 | 36.8 | 4 | 6 | 40.0 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 1.64 | 3.35 | 32.9 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| Total | 38 | 68 | 35.8 | 28 | 49 | 36.4 | 16 | 32 | 33.3 | 26 | 45 | 36.6 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 6.86 | 10.00 | 40.7 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | |
| CAR | P1 | 20 | 9 | 69.0 | 15 | 5 | 75.0 | 8 | 3 | 72.7 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 2.29 | 1.52 | 60.1 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
| P2 | 32 | 17 | 65.3 | 22 | 16 | 57.9 | 18 | 9 | 66.7 | 23 | 8 | 74.2 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 4.36 | 3.71 | 54.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 12 | 57.1 | 12 | 7 | 63.2 | 6 | 4 | 60.0 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 3.35 | 1.64 | 67.1 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| Total | 68 | 38 | 64.2 | 49 | 28 | 63.6 | 32 | 16 | 66.7 | 45 | 26 | 63.4 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 10.00 | 6.86 | 59.3 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | |
Win Probability
EDM Favored
CAR Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
EDM
CAR
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CAR Attempts
EDM Attempts
Individual Event Map
CAR ShootEDM Shoot
Shot on Net
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (CAR) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = EDM players, Columns = CAR players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| EDM ↓ / CAR → | Jarvis | Aho | Staal | Stankoven | Hall | Martinook | Ehlers | Jankowski | Robinson | Carrier | Svechnikov | Blake | Chatfield | Walker | Slavin | Miller | Nikishin | Gostisbehere |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDavid | 50 | 50 | 33 | 22 | 18 | 36 | 33 | 50 | — | 100 | 50 | 22 | 32 | 50 | 31 | 50 | 50 | 40 |
| Draisaitl | 50 | 50 | 40 | 27 | 23 | 41 | 43 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 27 | 41 | 41 | 38 | 38 | 100 | 100 |
| Savoie | 0 | 0 | 25 | 11 | 18 | 33 | 31 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 13 | 53 | 14 | 44 | 20 | 11 | — |
| Nugent-Hopkins | 29 | 31 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 17 | 100 | — | 100 | 31 | 0 | 31 | 14 | 28 | 33 | 17 | 50 |
| Roslovic | 14 | 17 | 31 | 17 | 25 | 36 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 17 | 20 | 57 | 20 | 47 | 27 | 40 | 50 |
| Dickinson | 18 | 18 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 100 | 25 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 25 |
| Henrique | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 83 | 0 | 33 | 63 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| Dach | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 75 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| Frederic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 75 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| Hyman | 63 | 63 | 33 | 25 | 20 | 36 | 38 | 50 | — | 100 | 63 | 25 | 32 | 56 | 31 | 50 | 100 | 100 |
| Kapanen | 14 | 14 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 100 | 17 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 100 | — |
| Podkolzin | 29 | 29 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 29 | 100 | 33 | 57 | 20 | 57 | 67 | 50 |
| Bouchard | 63 | 63 | 33 | 29 | 20 | 36 | 44 | 63 | 67 | 75 | 63 | 29 | 44 | 33 | 48 | 33 | 100 | 100 |
| Ekholm | 63 | 63 | 40 | 29 | 25 | 42 | 50 | 86 | 100 | 100 | 63 | 29 | 50 | 38 | 54 | 38 | 100 | 100 |
| Murphy | 13 | 14 | 27 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 14 | 100 | 30 | 44 | 22 | 50 | 27 | 33 |
| Walman | 17 | 18 | 27 | 50 | 60 | 33 | 23 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 18 | 100 | 27 | 38 | 21 | 40 | 50 | 33 |
| Nurse | 8 | 8 | 18 | 14 | 17 | 40 | 29 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 8 | 17 | 40 | 23 | 17 | 38 | 8 | 0 |
| Emberson | 10 | 10 | 25 | 14 | 17 | 40 | 40 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 10 | 17 | 29 | 23 | 13 | 38 | 14 | 0 |
