Game Recap
The Florida Panthers defeated the Detroit Red Wings 3-1 on March 6, 2026. Despite the result, the Detroit Red Wings held the edge in expected goals (9.06 to 3.53) at 5-on-5, indicating the Florida Panthers received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Detroit Red Wings created 10 high-danger scoring chances compared to 4 from the Florida Panthers at 5-on-5. Matthew Tkachuk recorded a hat trick with 3 goals. Emmitt Finnie was the most dangerous skater with 1.92 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Detroit Red Wings outshot the Florida Panthers 28-23 in total shots on goal.
- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Florida Panthers vs Detroit Red Wings progressed on Mar 6, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| DET | P1 | 20 | 13 | 60.6 | 12 | 11 | 52.2 | 8 | 6 | 57.1 | 13 | 6 | 68.4 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 2.33 | 1.81 | 56.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 23 | 10 | 69.7 | 20 | 5 | 80.0 | 10 | 4 | 71.4 | 17 | 5 | 77.3 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 5.86 | 0.50 | 92.1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 26 | 23 | 53.1 | 20 | 19 | 51.3 | 10 | 13 | 43.5 | 21 | 14 | 60.0 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 4.76 | 3.85 | 55.3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 69 | 46 | 60.0 | 52 | 35 | 59.8 | 28 | 23 | 54.9 | 51 | 25 | 67.1 | 14 | 7 | 66.7 | 12.95 | 6.16 | 67.8 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| FLA | P1 | 13 | 20 | 39.4 | 11 | 12 | 47.8 | 6 | 8 | 42.9 | 6 | 13 | 31.6 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 1.81 | 2.33 | 43.8 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 10 | 23 | 30.3 | 5 | 20 | 20.0 | 4 | 10 | 28.6 | 5 | 17 | 22.7 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 0.50 | 5.86 | 7.9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 23 | 26 | 46.9 | 19 | 20 | 48.7 | 13 | 10 | 56.5 | 14 | 21 | 40.0 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 3.85 | 4.76 | 44.7 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 46 | 69 | 40.0 | 35 | 52 | 40.2 | 23 | 28 | 45.1 | 25 | 51 | 32.9 | 7 | 14 | 33.3 | 6.16 | 12.95 | 32.2 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
Win Probability
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
Shot Density Heatmap
Individual Event Map
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (DET) performed against every skater on the away team (FLA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = DET players, Columns = FLA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the DET player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| DET ↓ / FLA → | Bennett | Reinhart | Verhaeghe | Rodrigues | Lundell | Luostarinen | Boqvist | Tkachuk | Nosek | Greer | Marchand | Samoskevich | Mikkola | Ekblad | Forsling | Balinskis | Kulikov | Sebrango |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larkin | 56 | 44 | 69 | 75 | 60 | 89 | 75 | 43 | 100 | 86 | 69 | — | 64 | 72 | 88 | 50 | 83 | 91 |
| Copp | 50 | 40 | 29 | 40 | 36 | 80 | 0 | 50 | 83 | 75 | 33 | 50 | 53 | 64 | 80 | 56 | 0 | 0 |
| Finnie | 100 | 50 | 100 | 64 | 50 | 60 | 54 | 100 | 57 | 25 | 33 | 40 | 67 | 88 | 86 | 63 | 40 | 40 |
| Kasper | 100 | 50 | 50 | 36 | 30 | 33 | 40 | 100 | 45 | 25 | 33 | 31 | 50 | 80 | 80 | 56 | 20 | 20 |
| Appleton | 100 | 57 | 40 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 25 | 100 | 33 | 25 | 33 | 18 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 56 | 22 | 22 |
| Rasmussen | 14 | 20 | 0 | — | — | 67 | 50 | 14 | 67 | 67 | 20 | 67 | 50 | 17 | 0 | 40 | 100 | 100 |
| Raymond | 69 | 60 | 69 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 57 | 56 | 67 | 70 | 100 | — | 59 | 92 | 67 | 57 | 77 | 83 |
| Compher | 64 | 60 | 64 | 33 | 33 | 100 | — | 50 | — | 100 | 89 | 0 | 60 | 78 | 83 | 50 | 83 | 100 |
| van Riemsdyk | 0 | — | 0 | — | — | 100 | 67 | 0 | 83 | 100 | — | 67 | 67 | 100 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 100 |
| DeBrincat | 60 | 44 | 33 | 50 | 45 | 80 | 14 | 60 | 69 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 55 | 77 | 64 | 63 | 20 | 50 |
| Kane | 50 | 44 | 50 | 56 | 50 | 80 | 40 | 60 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 59 | 80 | 67 | 63 | 25 | 50 |
| Shine | 50 | — | 0 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 100 | — | 67 | 50 | — | 50 | 50 | 100 | 100 |
| Seider | 63 | 36 | 71 | 50 | 36 | 57 | 55 | 50 | 67 | 25 | 33 | 60 | 50 | 72 | 57 | 29 | 64 | 64 |
| Edvinsson | 71 | 36 | 71 | 22 | 22 | 40 | 33 | 60 | 75 | 57 | 40 | 33 | 55 | 67 | 67 | 29 | 33 | 33 |
| Chiarot | 36 | 46 | 23 | 45 | 36 | 75 | 42 | 36 | 55 | 80 | 33 | 50 | 38 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 36 | 57 |
| Johansson | 71 | 50 | 63 | 40 | 40 | 89 | 14 | 60 | 55 | 58 | 88 | 20 | 67 | 80 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 50 |
| Bernard-Docker | 36 | 46 | 23 | 45 | 36 | 100 | 33 | 36 | 44 | 100 | 33 | 42 | 40 | 38 | 67 | 53 | 36 | 57 |
| Sandin-Pellikka | 100 | 100 | 100 | 88 | 80 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 67 | 83 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 70 |
