Utah Mammoth vs Philadelphia Flyers — March 5, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Philadelphia Flyers couldn't find the back of the net as the Utah Mammoth cruised to a 3-0 win on March 5, 2026. Clayton Keller generated the most offense at even strength with 0.94 ixG on 4 shots. UTA had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 5.20 xG against 3.94 while holding 55.3% of shot attempts.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Philadelphia Flyers progressed on Mar 5, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA3 - 0PHI

Mar 5, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PHI	P1	12	16	42.9	6	9	40.0	4	4	50.0	9	7	56.3	2	0	100.0	1.08	0.86	55.8	0	0	—
	P2	23	20	53.5	12	15	44.4	7	14	33.3	18	13	58.1	4	3	57.1	2.45	2.84	46.3	0	2	0.0
	P3	11	21	34.4	8	17	32.0	5	5	50.0	6	12	33.3	2	4	33.3	1.64	3.14	34.3	0	1	0.0
	Total	46	57	44.7	26	41	38.8	16	23	41.0	33	32	50.8	8	7	53.3	5.17	6.83	43.1	0	3	0.0
UTA	P1	16	12	57.1	9	6	60.0	4	4	50.0	7	9	43.8	0	2	0.0	0.86	1.08	44.2	0	0	—
	P2	20	23	46.5	15	12	55.6	14	7	66.7	13	18	41.9	3	4	42.9	2.84	2.45	53.7	2	0	100.0
	P3	21	11	65.6	17	8	68.0	5	5	50.0	12	6	66.7	4	2	66.7	3.14	1.64	65.7	1	0	100.0
	Total	57	46	55.3	41	26	61.2	23	16	59.0	32	33	49.2	7	8	46.7	6.83	5.17	56.9	3	0	100.0

Win Probability

PHI Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PHI

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

PHI Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootPHI Shoot

Missed Shot

Hit

Hit Taken

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PHI) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PHI players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PHI ↓ / UTA →	McBain	Schmaltz	Hayton	Cooley	Kerfoot	Stenlund	Crouse	Carcone	Guenther	Yamamoto	Keller	Peterka	Durzi	Cole	Marino	DeSimone	Schmidt	Simashev
Couturier	0	50	0	60	100	100	60	100	50	0	50	60	22	42	63	70	57	50
Zegras	50	67	29	33	67	88	50	86	75	33	50	33	57	80	60	33	64	60
Dvorak	33	60	29	33	80	80	33	80	60	33	60	33	40	100	64	0	67	0
Barkey	0	0	0	58	0	0	54	0	0	0	0	58	0	22	40	63	40	50
Cates	44	38	17	0	63	86	0	86	43	33	0	0	38	11	56	83	0	100
Deslauriers	0	0	0	—	100	100	—	100	0	0	0	—	50	50	0	0	0	0
Tippett	40	63	25	33	80	100	50	100	63	29	50	33	33	67	58	33	64	50
Brink	43	20	33	—	71	88	100	86	25	43	0	—	50	29	71	50	33	60
Grebenkin	0	0	0	57	0	0	53	0	0	0	0	57	0	27	40	60	40	43
Hathaway	0	75	0	67	100	100	67	100	75	0	75	67	75	67	40	33	40	0
Michkov	29	0	29	—	100	100	100	100	0	38	0	—	45	25	80	67	33	67
Grundstrom	20	60	20	100	50	33	50	33	60	20	60	100	75	75	40	20	40	20
Sanheim	50	47	25	43	100	100	43	100	47	33	43	43	55	60	61	67	53	33
Drysdale	38	40	27	75	75	71	70	67	40	33	0	75	42	44	60	50	44	54
York	27	0	25	78	50	100	78	100	0	33	0	78	30	44	44	54	33	56
Ristolainen	75	56	0	50	100	100	50	100	56	0	46	50	40	67	50	75	54	60
Juulsen	0	0	0	25	50	50	20	50	—	0	0	25	30	13	67	0	67	0
Andrae	0	0	0	25	33	50	25	50	—	0	0	25	11	11	40	0	50	0