Game Recap
The Columbus Blue Jackets took down the Nashville Predators 3-2 on Tuesday. High-danger chances at 5-on-5: CBJ 10, NSH 8. CBJ had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 7.16 xG against 4.83 while holding 56.7% of shot attempts. CBJ outshot NSH 27-25.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Nashville Predators vs Columbus Blue Jackets progressed on Mar 3, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NSH2 - 3CBJ
Mar 3, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CBJ | P1 | 20 | 20 | 50.0 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 1.87 | 3.53 | 34.6 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 26 | 17 | 60.5 | 20 | 12 | 62.5 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 19 | 8 | 70.4 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 3.79 | 2.09 | 64.4 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 22 | 21 | 51.2 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 8 | 7 | 53.3 | 18 | 16 | 52.9 | 8 | 4 | 66.7 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 71.5 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 68 | 58 | 54.0 | 51 | 36 | 58.6 | 27 | 25 | 51.9 | 50 | 40 | 55.6 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 10.65 | 7.61 | 58.3 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | |
| NSH | P1 | 20 | 20 | 50.0 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 3.53 | 1.87 | 65.4 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 26 | 39.5 | 12 | 20 | 37.5 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 8 | 19 | 29.6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 2.09 | 3.79 | 35.6 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 21 | 22 | 48.8 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 7 | 8 | 46.7 | 16 | 18 | 47.1 | 4 | 8 | 33.3 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 28.5 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 58 | 68 | 46.0 | 36 | 51 | 41.4 | 25 | 27 | 48.1 | 40 | 50 | 44.4 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 7.61 | 10.65 | 41.7 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | |
Win Probability
CBJ Favored
NSH Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CBJ
NSH
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NSH Attempts
CBJ Attempts
Individual Event Map
NSH ShootCBJ Shoot
Goal
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CBJ) performed against every skater on the away team (NSH) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CBJ players, Columns = NSH players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CBJ player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CBJ ↓ / NSH → | O'Reilly | Jost | Stamkos | Wiesblatt | Forsberg | Haula | Bunting | L'Heureux | Evangelista | Marchessault | Wood | Smith | Josi | Skjei | Blankenburg | Perbix | Hague | Barron |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monahan | 13 | 79 | 19 | 29 | 35 | 75 | 67 | 73 | 44 | 22 | 57 | — | 41 | 43 | 75 | 63 | 88 | 40 |
| Coyle | 45 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 26 | 73 | 75 | 100 | 18 | 58 | 100 | — | 53 | 86 | 75 | 54 | 44 | 50 |
| Fantilli | 60 | 57 | 67 | 25 | 56 | 68 | 50 | 25 | 55 | 67 | 40 | — | 75 | 54 | 68 | 57 | 53 | 75 |
| Johnson | 0 | 79 | 33 | 25 | 71 | 75 | 67 | 73 | 64 | 0 | 50 | — | 64 | 43 | 75 | 56 | 78 | 40 |
| Sillinger | 73 | — | 71 | 0 | 80 | 100 | 60 | — | 100 | 75 | 50 | — | 83 | 88 | 83 | 33 | 60 | 0 |
| Lundeström | 40 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 60 | 50 | 0 | 40 | 25 | — | 20 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 67 | 29 |
| Marchment | 60 | 57 | 67 | 25 | 53 | 69 | 67 | 40 | 53 | 67 | 50 | — | 71 | 57 | 68 | 57 | 57 | 75 |
| Heinen | 0 | 90 | 33 | 25 | 78 | 86 | 77 | 100 | 75 | 0 | 50 | — | 79 | 25 | 88 | 43 | 78 | 40 |
| Wood | 40 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 60 | 50 | 0 | 40 | 25 | — | 20 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 80 | 25 |
| Voronkov | 25 | 67 | 33 | 0 | 20 | 33 | 75 | 40 | 0 | 25 | 50 | — | 25 | 29 | 0 | 80 | 75 | 29 |
| Marchenko | 60 | 44 | 67 | 25 | 56 | 67 | 25 | 17 | 56 | 67 | 50 | — | 56 | 62 | 59 | 57 | 53 | 100 |
| Olivier | 75 | — | 73 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 75 | — | — | 76 | 100 | — | 86 | 86 | 100 | 43 | 67 | 0 |
| Provorov | 28 | 40 | 30 | 0 | 23 | 83 | 63 | 60 | 23 | 35 | 20 | — | 35 | 50 | 75 | 53 | 55 | 30 |
| Gudbranson | 24 | 40 | 27 | 0 | 24 | 80 | 75 | 60 | 25 | 32 | 33 | — | 35 | 36 | 60 | 33 | 56 | 25 |
| Severson | 82 | 50 | 89 | 20 | 55 | 50 | 67 | 20 | 36 | 83 | 50 | — | 79 | 56 | 60 | 50 | 57 | 67 |
| Mateychuk | 83 | 43 | 90 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 71 | 20 | 40 | 85 | 63 | — | 82 | 64 | 62 | 46 | 50 | 75 |
| Zamula | 100 | 85 | 100 | 50 | 67 | 57 | 67 | 75 | 71 | 100 | 50 | — | 71 | 67 | 68 | 67 | 80 | 50 |
| Fabbro | 0 | 86 | 0 | 25 | 67 | 50 | 58 | 78 | 71 | 0 | 50 | — | 62 | 25 | 68 | 60 | 89 | 25 |
