Game Recap
The Colorado Avalanche defeated the Los Angeles Kings 4-2 on March 2, 2026. The Colorado Avalanche controlled play with 64.7% Corsi and generated 10.16 expected goals compared to 5.95 from the Los Angeles Kings at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Colorado Avalanche created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the Los Angeles Kings at 5-on-5. Nathan MacKinnon was the most dangerous skater with 2.17 individual expected goals on 7 shots at 5-on-5. The Colorado Avalanche outshot the Los Angeles Kings 39-21 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Colorado Avalanche vs Los Angeles Kings progressed on Mar 2, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
COL4 - 2LAK
Mar 2, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| LAK | P1 | 12 | 23 | 34.3 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 5 | 16 | 23.8 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 1.74 | 1.71 | 50.4 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 |
| P2 | 12 | 31 | 27.9 | 10 | 23 | 30.3 | 5 | 14 | 26.3 | 6 | 23 | 20.7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 2.06 | 5.50 | 27.3 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 22 | 25 | 46.8 | 15 | 18 | 45.5 | 8 | 16 | 33.3 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 2.28 | 3.39 | 40.2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 46 | 79 | 36.8 | 35 | 55 | 38.9 | 21 | 39 | 35.0 | 25 | 51 | 32.9 | 6 | 11 | 35.3 | 6.08 | 10.60 | 36.5 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
| COL | P1 | 23 | 12 | 65.7 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 16 | 5 | 76.2 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1.71 | 1.74 | 49.6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
| P2 | 31 | 12 | 72.1 | 23 | 10 | 69.7 | 14 | 5 | 73.7 | 23 | 6 | 79.3 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | 5.50 | 2.06 | 72.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 25 | 22 | 53.2 | 18 | 15 | 54.5 | 16 | 8 | 66.7 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 3.39 | 2.28 | 59.8 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 79 | 46 | 63.2 | 55 | 35 | 61.1 | 39 | 21 | 65.0 | 51 | 25 | 67.1 | 11 | 6 | 64.7 | 10.60 | 6.08 | 63.5 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
Win Probability
LAK Favored
COL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
LAK
COL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
COL Attempts
LAK Attempts
Individual Event Map
COL ShootLAK Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (LAK) performed against every skater on the away team (COL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = LAK players, Columns = COL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the LAK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| LAK ↓ / COL → | MacKinnon | Necas | Nelson | Drury | Kelly | Colton | Bardakov | Brindley | Landeskog | Olofsson | Lehkonen | Nichushkin | Makar | Toews | Malinski | Burns | Kulak | Manson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kopitar | 54 | 64 | 43 | 33 | 45 | 30 | 0 | 100 | 62 | 33 | 25 | 41 | 71 | 82 | 48 | 23 | 42 | 17 |
| Helenius | 13 | 22 | 40 | 44 | 100 | 67 | 33 | 0 | 22 | 38 | 0 | 29 | 43 | 50 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Turcotte | 23 | 22 | 63 | 67 | 25 | 43 | 50 | 40 | 20 | 75 | — | 100 | 40 | 38 | 38 | 50 | 60 | 33 |
| Connors | 44 | 60 | 56 | 100 | 50 | 56 | 100 | 75 | 50 | 71 | 0 | 50 | 83 | 67 | 36 | 71 | 44 | 67 |
| Panarin | 46 | 60 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 40 | — | 100 | 60 | 27 | 25 | 47 | 74 | 79 | 48 | 23 | 42 | 18 |
| Foegele | 19 | 19 | 60 | 11 | 25 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 30 | — | 60 | 16 | 15 | 20 | 36 | 17 | 27 |
| Malott | 14 | 14 | 0 | 44 | 75 | 100 | 40 | 33 | 14 | 50 | — | 0 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 36 |
| Kempe | 43 | 53 | 55 | 25 | 67 | 44 | 0 | 100 | 57 | 23 | 25 | 47 | 65 | 67 | 59 | 15 | 53 | 9 |
| Laferriere | 14 | 14 | 67 | 10 | 44 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 30 | — | 75 | 19 | 19 | 20 | 33 | 20 | 27 |
| Perry | 18 | 18 | 50 | 25 | 45 | 43 | 0 | 50 | 19 | 45 | 0 | 54 | 25 | 32 | 30 | 50 | 30 | 38 |
| Ward | 25 | 25 | 0 | 44 | 43 | 25 | 40 | 33 | 25 | 50 | — | 0 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 |
| Wright | 44 | 60 | 45 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 71 | 0 | 43 | 71 | 75 | 31 | 67 | 36 | 50 |
| Ceci | 26 | 27 | 38 | 25 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 33 | 26 | 57 | 0 | 36 | 28 | 24 | 33 | 43 | 20 | 29 |
| Clarke | 30 | 41 | 62 | 33 | 43 | 35 | 100 | 67 | 39 | 55 | 25 | 60 | 58 | 60 | 41 | 38 | 45 | 22 |
| Anderson | 27 | 28 | 55 | 25 | 20 | 50 | 0 | 67 | 28 | 57 | — | 63 | 35 | 29 | 50 | 33 | 43 | 25 |
| Edmundson | 36 | 50 | 48 | 29 | 33 | 38 | 67 | — | 50 | 55 | 13 | 43 | 56 | 53 | 29 | 60 | 33 | 60 |
| Dumoulin | 0 | 17 | 13 | 42 | 67 | 56 | 29 | 40 | 20 | 29 | — | 9 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 26 | 25 | 25 |
| Booth | 0 | 33 | 13 | 35 | 50 | 33 | 25 | 40 | 33 | 24 | — | 10 | 20 | 25 | 50 | 24 | 50 | 25 |
