Game Recap
The Detroit Red Wings defeated the Nashville Predators 4-2 on March 2, 2026. Despite the result, the Nashville Predators held the edge in expected goals (9.01 to 6.91) at 5-on-5, indicating the Detroit Red Wings received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Nashville Predators created 14 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the Detroit Red Wings at 5-on-5. Ryan O'Reilly was the most dangerous skater with 2.89 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Detroit Red Wings outshot the Nashville Predators 31-30 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Detroit Red Wings vs Nashville Predators progressed on Mar 2, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
DET4 - 2NSH
Mar 2, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NSH | P1 | 27 | 19 | 58.7 | 17 | 17 | 50.0 | 11 | 11 | 50.0 | 18 | 12 | 60.0 | 7 | 4 | 63.6 | 4.29 | 3.68 | 53.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 21 | 44.7 | 12 | 19 | 38.7 | 6 | 14 | 30.0 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 2.16 | 2.95 | 42.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 28 | 14 | 66.7 | 22 | 10 | 68.8 | 13 | 6 | 68.4 | 19 | 8 | 70.4 | 7 | 1 | 87.5 | 4.30 | 2.03 | 67.9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 72 | 54 | 57.1 | 51 | 46 | 52.6 | 30 | 31 | 49.2 | 49 | 29 | 62.8 | 17 | 6 | 73.9 | 10.76 | 8.66 | 55.4 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
| DET | P1 | 19 | 27 | 41.3 | 17 | 17 | 50.0 | 11 | 11 | 50.0 | 12 | 18 | 40.0 | 4 | 7 | 36.4 | 3.68 | 4.29 | 46.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 17 | 55.3 | 19 | 12 | 61.3 | 14 | 6 | 70.0 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 2.95 | 2.16 | 57.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 14 | 28 | 33.3 | 10 | 22 | 31.3 | 6 | 13 | 31.6 | 8 | 19 | 29.6 | 1 | 7 | 12.5 | 2.03 | 4.30 | 32.1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 54 | 72 | 42.9 | 46 | 51 | 47.4 | 31 | 30 | 50.8 | 29 | 49 | 37.2 | 6 | 17 | 26.1 | 8.66 | 10.76 | 44.6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
Win Probability
NSH Favored
DET Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NSH
DET
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
DET Attempts
NSH Attempts
Individual Event Map
DET ShootNSH Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NSH) performed against every skater on the away team (DET) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NSH players, Columns = DET players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NSH player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NSH ↓ / DET → | Larkin | Copp | Kasper | Rasmussen | Appleton | Finnie | Raymond | van Riemsdyk | Compher | DeBrincat | Kane | Shine | Chiarot | Seider | Edvinsson | Bernard-Docker | Johansson | Sandin-Pellikka |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O'Reilly | 33 | 52 | 57 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 41 | 50 | 60 | 43 | 0 | 100 | 76 | 33 | 40 | 58 | 67 | 0 |
| Stamkos | 50 | 50 | 64 | 40 | 50 | 63 | 44 | 75 | 60 | 44 | 0 | 100 | 71 | 43 | 45 | 57 | 50 | 0 |
| Jost | 0 | 33 | 63 | 0 | 64 | 64 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 82 | 88 | 78 | 75 | 70 | 58 |
| McCarron | 100 | 17 | 33 | 100 | 22 | 11 | 17 | 43 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 43 | 38 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 31 | 27 |
| Haula | 53 | 50 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 40 | 67 | 60 | 53 | 100 | 71 | 57 | 67 | 73 | 25 | 0 |
| Forsberg | 60 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 100 | 80 | 50 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 72 | 86 | 78 | 73 | 50 | 0 |
| L'Heureux | 0 | 100 | 64 | 33 | 60 | 64 | 100 | 76 | 80 | 100 | 0 | 87 | 82 | 75 | 67 | 73 | 67 | 54 |
| Bunting | 75 | 0 | 33 | 67 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 33 | 0 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 17 | 0 | 67 | 33 | 43 |
| Marchessault | 50 | 48 | 14 | 40 | 17 | 25 | 47 | 25 | 60 | 47 | 0 | 100 | 64 | 40 | 42 | 57 | 14 | 0 |
| Evangelista | 53 | 100 | 75 | 58 | 75 | 100 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 56 | 100 | 75 | 67 | 57 | 69 | 56 | 0 |
| Wood | 25 | 33 | 64 | 25 | 55 | 60 | 33 | 88 | 86 | 33 | 0 | 88 | 71 | 70 | 55 | 77 | 58 | 58 |
| Smith | 67 | 17 | 38 | 50 | 30 | 20 | 17 | 60 | 33 | 20 | 0 | 60 | 38 | 33 | 33 | 40 | 33 | 30 |
| Josi | 43 | 55 | 40 | 50 | 0 | 29 | 47 | 71 | 62 | 53 | 0 | 71 | 61 | 55 | 50 | 62 | 40 | 38 |
| Hague | 55 | 25 | 74 | 50 | 75 | 70 | 33 | 71 | 83 | 43 | 47 | 100 | 74 | 50 | 58 | 72 | 46 | 43 |
| Skjei | 0 | 50 | 31 | 33 | 33 | 36 | 43 | 67 | 67 | 47 | 0 | 67 | 62 | 39 | 41 | 44 | 50 | 30 |
| Perbix | 53 | 43 | 78 | 60 | 70 | 75 | 33 | 40 | 50 | 40 | 43 | 100 | 81 | 36 | 60 | 67 | 57 | 0 |
| Blankenburg | 67 | 17 | 40 | 67 | 38 | 45 | 25 | 73 | 83 | 25 | 100 | 92 | 72 | 38 | 29 | 72 | 50 | 50 |
| Barron | 0 | — | 25 | 0 | 33 | 25 | — | 83 | 83 | — | 0 | 83 | 33 | 67 | 67 | 40 | 40 | 50 |
