Game Recap
The Pittsburgh Penguins blanked the Vegas Golden Knights 5-0 on March 1, 2026. Dig into the 5-on-5 data, and VGK had the better of it (5.97 xG to 3.46). Sometimes the bounces just don't go your way. Keep an eye on Smith — 1.37 individual xG on 3 shots at 5-on-5. PIT outshot VGK 23-22.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Vegas Golden Knights vs Pittsburgh Penguins progressed on Mar 1, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
VGK0 - 5PIT
Mar 1, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| PIT | P1 | 18 | 14 | 56.3 | 8 | 7 | 53.3 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 2.29 | 0.90 | 71.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 23 | 46.5 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 11 | 7 | 61.1 | 16 | 18 | 47.1 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 3.35 | 2.34 | 58.9 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 10 | 18 | 35.7 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 7 | 12 | 36.8 | 0 | 5 | 0.0 | 0.84 | 3.94 | 17.5 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 48 | 55 | 46.6 | 31 | 35 | 47.0 | 23 | 22 | 51.1 | 38 | 41 | 48.1 | 12 | 10 | 54.5 | 6.48 | 7.18 | 47.4 | 5 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| VGK | P1 | 14 | 18 | 43.8 | 7 | 8 | 46.7 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 0.90 | 2.29 | 28.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 23 | 20 | 53.5 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 7 | 11 | 38.9 | 18 | 16 | 52.9 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 2.34 | 3.35 | 41.1 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 10 | 64.3 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 12 | 7 | 63.2 | 5 | 0 | 100.0 | 3.94 | 0.84 | 82.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 55 | 48 | 53.4 | 35 | 31 | 53.0 | 22 | 23 | 48.9 | 41 | 38 | 51.9 | 10 | 12 | 45.5 | 7.18 | 6.48 | 52.6 | 0 | 5 | 0.0 | |
Win Probability
PIT Favored
VGK Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
PIT
VGK
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
VGK Attempts
PIT Attempts
Individual Event Map
VGK ShootPIT Shoot
Save
Goal Against
Missed Shot Against
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PIT) performed against every skater on the away team (VGK) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = PIT players, Columns = VGK players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the PIT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| PIT ↓ / VGK → | Hertl | Eichel | Sissons | Barbashev | Saad | Reinhardt | Marner | Dorofeyev | Smith | Kolesar | Bowman | Stone | Andersson | Hanifin | Theodore | McNabb | Lauzon | Korczak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malkin | 55 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 50 | — | 80 | 0 | 60 | 55 | 71 | 100 | 80 | 80 | 75 | 73 | 83 | 60 |
| Acciari | 0 | 40 | 20 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 29 | 40 | 0 | 33 | — | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 33 |
| Novak | 40 | 83 | — | 86 | 20 | — | 67 | 50 | 67 | 33 | 71 | 67 | 57 | 57 | 67 | 63 | 50 | 60 |
| Kindel | 63 | 100 | 22 | 50 | 44 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 14 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 45 | 71 | 30 | 60 | 100 | 100 |
| Dewar | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 38 | 50 | 0 | 33 | — | 0 | 0 | 43 | 67 | 60 | 50 |
| Lizotte | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | 0 | — | 33 | 31 | 50 | 0 | 33 | — | 0 | 0 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 50 |
| Rust | 57 | 57 | 50 | 36 | 100 | 100 | 77 | 57 | 56 | 100 | 43 | 33 | 64 | 90 | 38 | 89 | 83 | 75 |
| Rakell | 50 | 73 | 100 | 67 | 60 | 100 | 82 | 50 | 67 | 60 | 50 | 67 | 89 | 89 | 56 | 58 | 86 | 40 |
| Mantha | 70 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 63 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 67 | 71 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 43 | 73 | 100 | 100 |
| Chinakhov | 33 | 89 | — | 89 | 20 | — | 100 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 67 | 83 | 57 | 57 | 80 | 71 | 63 | 67 |
| Hayes | 50 | 17 | 100 | 29 | — | 100 | 25 | 20 | 29 | — | 60 | 33 | 20 | 20 | 60 | 29 | 60 | 29 |
| Brazeau | 71 | 80 | 50 | 75 | 71 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 67 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 71 | 83 | 83 |
| Karlsson | 50 | 62 | 29 | 33 | 60 | — | 47 | 9 | 29 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 75 | 20 | 59 | 73 | 50 |
| Letang | 33 | 83 | 80 | 71 | 43 | 100 | 80 | 88 | 71 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 50 | 57 | 64 | 71 | 75 | 100 |
| Shea | 25 | 60 | 0 | 55 | 20 | 0 | 27 | 17 | 38 | 33 | 33 | 100 | 30 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 44 |
| Girard | 33 | 80 | 100 | 80 | 43 | 100 | 75 | 86 | 80 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 57 | 57 | 67 | 67 | 71 | 100 |
| Clifton | 25 | 64 | 0 | 70 | 20 | 0 | 43 | 25 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 100 | 38 | 43 | 63 | 67 | 75 | 50 |
| Wotherspoon | 42 | 50 | 17 | 45 | 33 | — | 17 | 14 | 11 | 57 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 57 | 50 |
