Game Recap
The Los Angeles Kings shut out the Calgary Flames 2-0 on February 28, 2026. The Los Angeles Kings controlled play with 50.0% Corsi and generated 10.43 expected goals compared to 9.16 from the Calgary Flames at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Calgary Flames created 18 high-danger scoring chances compared to 10 from the Los Angeles Kings at 5-on-5. Anze Kopitar was the most dangerous skater with 2.25 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Los Angeles Kings outshot the Calgary Flames 37-29 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Calgary Flames vs Los Angeles Kings progressed on Feb 28, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CGY0 - 2LAK
Feb 28, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| LAK | P1 | 22 | 29 | 43.1 | 18 | 18 | 50.0 | 13 | 14 | 48.1 | 16 | 24 | 40.0 | 1 | 7 | 12.5 | 2.80 | 3.11 | 47.3 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 30 | 23 | 56.6 | 23 | 15 | 60.5 | 15 | 10 | 60.0 | 16 | 15 | 51.6 | 7 | 7 | 50.0 | 5.43 | 3.45 | 61.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 19 | 18 | 51.4 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 9 | 5 | 64.3 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 2.24 | 3.19 | 41.3 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 71 | 70 | 50.4 | 57 | 46 | 55.3 | 37 | 29 | 56.1 | 42 | 48 | 46.7 | 10 | 19 | 34.5 | 10.47 | 9.75 | 51.8 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| CGY | P1 | 29 | 22 | 56.9 | 18 | 18 | 50.0 | 14 | 13 | 51.9 | 24 | 16 | 60.0 | 7 | 1 | 87.5 | 3.11 | 2.80 | 52.7 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 23 | 30 | 43.4 | 15 | 23 | 39.5 | 10 | 15 | 40.0 | 15 | 16 | 48.4 | 7 | 7 | 50.0 | 3.45 | 5.43 | 38.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 19 | 48.6 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 5 | 9 | 35.7 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 3.19 | 2.24 | 58.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 70 | 71 | 49.6 | 46 | 57 | 44.7 | 29 | 37 | 43.9 | 48 | 42 | 53.3 | 19 | 10 | 65.5 | 9.75 | 10.47 | 48.2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
Win Probability
LAK Favored
CGY Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
LAK
CGY
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CGY Attempts
LAK Attempts
Individual Event Map
CGY ShootLAK Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (LAK) performed against every skater on the away team (CGY) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = LAK players, Columns = CGY players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the LAK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| LAK ↓ / CGY → | Kadri | Sharangovich | Backlund | Zary | Frost | Beecher | Pospisil | Farabee | Coleman | Klapka | Coronato | Gridin | Kuznetsov | Whitecloud | Weegar | Bahl | Parekh | Hanley |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kopitar | 32 | 56 | 56 | 57 | 67 | 100 | 67 | 33 | 67 | 31 | 63 | 67 | 36 | 36 | 62 | 60 | 100 | — |
| Helenius | 33 | 67 | 0 | 50 | 15 | 91 | 83 | 50 | 14 | 77 | 33 | 17 | 60 | 60 | 31 | 42 | 71 | 44 |
| Turcotte | 25 | — | — | 14 | 80 | 36 | 38 | 17 | 83 | 50 | — | 75 | 22 | 33 | 0 | — | 58 | 64 |
| Panarin | 33 | 56 | 56 | 57 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 35 | 67 | 31 | 63 | 67 | 38 | 38 | 62 | 60 | 100 | — |
| Moore | 88 | 63 | 65 | 89 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 89 | 50 | — | 61 | 40 | 63 | 68 | 67 | 75 | 60 | 67 |
| Malott | 25 | 67 | 0 | 50 | 17 | 90 | 75 | 33 | 15 | 75 | 33 | 18 | 55 | 60 | 31 | 45 | 67 | 38 |
| Foegele | 33 | — | — | 17 | 57 | 31 | 31 | 20 | 63 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 17 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 62 |
| Kempe | 33 | 56 | 60 | 63 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 35 | 67 | 31 | 67 | 67 | 38 | 38 | 64 | 63 | 100 | — |
| Byfield | 88 | 63 | 65 | 89 | 43 | 20 | 0 | 89 | 43 | 0 | 55 | 33 | 55 | 68 | 67 | 75 | 33 | 57 |
| Laferriere | 67 | 63 | 63 | 70 | 40 | 33 | 0 | 70 | 40 | 0 | 59 | 40 | 57 | 67 | 50 | 71 | 50 | 50 |
| Ward | 20 | 67 | 0 | 33 | 15 | 91 | 77 | 25 | 14 | 77 | 33 | 17 | 50 | 55 | 29 | 42 | 71 | 44 |
| Perry | 50 | — | — | 17 | 71 | 29 | 27 | 33 | 75 | 50 | 0 | 60 | 17 | 43 | 0 | — | 44 | 67 |
| Clarke | 36 | 53 | 56 | 70 | 31 | 86 | 67 | 39 | 29 | 39 | 56 | 33 | 30 | 31 | 48 | 55 | 83 | 62 |
| Edmundson | 31 | 58 | 58 | 50 | 25 | 80 | 57 | 33 | 22 | 37 | 58 | 25 | 22 | 26 | 47 | 53 | 80 | 75 |
| Ceci | 78 | 82 | 78 | 67 | 57 | 50 | 56 | 67 | 57 | 71 | 58 | 57 | 70 | 88 | 82 | 82 | 25 | 33 |
| Anderson | 78 | 80 | 78 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 58 | 40 | 67 | 88 | 67 | 67 | 31 | 50 |
| Dumoulin | 40 | 33 | 33 | 20 | 44 | 67 | 64 | 40 | 47 | 65 | 43 | 38 | 44 | 53 | 35 | 54 | 71 | 50 |
| Moverare | 50 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 54 | 58 | 55 | 50 | 57 | 67 | 50 | 45 | 46 | 50 | 33 | 43 | 71 | 67 |
