Game Recap
The Buffalo Sabres defeated the Tampa Bay Lightning 6-2 on February 28, 2026. Despite the result, the Tampa Bay Lightning held the edge in expected goals (9.65 to 6.74) at 5-on-5, indicating the Buffalo Sabres received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Tampa Bay Lightning created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the Buffalo Sabres at 5-on-5. Josh Norris scored 2 goals. Anthony Cirelli was the most dangerous skater with 1.75 individual expected goals on 1 shots at 5-on-5. The Tampa Bay Lightning outshot the Buffalo Sabres 38-35 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Buffalo Sabres vs Tampa Bay Lightning progressed on Feb 28, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
BUF6 - 2TBL
Feb 28, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| TBL | P1 | 25 | 20 | 55.6 | 19 | 16 | 54.3 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 16 | 15 | 51.6 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 4.63 | 4.39 | 51.3 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 27 | 42.6 | 15 | 26 | 36.6 | 12 | 20 | 37.5 | 14 | 20 | 41.2 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 3.57 | 5.47 | 39.5 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 20 | 8 | 71.4 | 17 | 8 | 68.0 | 12 | 5 | 70.6 | 15 | 5 | 75.0 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 2.79 | 1.58 | 63.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 65 | 55 | 54.2 | 51 | 50 | 50.5 | 38 | 35 | 52.1 | 45 | 40 | 52.9 | 11 | 9 | 55.0 | 10.99 | 11.43 | 49.0 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | |
| BUF | P1 | 20 | 25 | 44.4 | 16 | 19 | 45.7 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 15 | 16 | 48.4 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 4.39 | 4.63 | 48.7 | 4 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 27 | 20 | 57.4 | 26 | 15 | 63.4 | 20 | 12 | 62.5 | 20 | 14 | 58.8 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 5.47 | 3.57 | 60.5 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 8 | 20 | 28.6 | 8 | 17 | 32.0 | 5 | 12 | 29.4 | 5 | 15 | 25.0 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 1.58 | 2.79 | 36.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 55 | 65 | 45.8 | 50 | 51 | 49.5 | 35 | 38 | 47.9 | 40 | 45 | 47.1 | 9 | 11 | 45.0 | 11.43 | 10.99 | 51.0 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | |
Win Probability
TBL Favored
BUF Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
TBL
BUF
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
BUF Attempts
TBL Attempts
Individual Event Map
BUF ShootTBL Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (TBL) performed against every skater on the away team (BUF) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = TBL players, Columns = BUF players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the TBL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| TBL ↓ / BUF → | McLeod | Thompson | Krebs | Norris | Ostlund | Kozak | Zucker | Malenstyn | Benson | Tuch | Doan | Quinn | Dahlin | Samuelsson | Power | Byram | Kesselring | Metsa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cirelli | 35 | 22 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 67 | 45 | 25 | 35 | 33 | 50 | 42 | 25 | 80 | 33 |
| Guentzel | 47 | 27 | 29 | 40 | 50 | 75 | 38 | 75 | 67 | 44 | 50 | 36 | 45 | 60 | 36 | 44 | 50 | 40 |
| Point | 43 | — | — | 38 | 67 | 82 | 29 | 63 | 67 | 78 | 57 | 29 | 46 | 68 | 50 | 53 | 0 | 100 |
| Gourde | 20 | 26 | 33 | 20 | 50 | — | 0 | — | — | 36 | 14 | 17 | 10 | 14 | 55 | 25 | 50 | 25 |
| Girgensons | 0 | 29 | 38 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — | 36 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 44 | 14 | 40 | 50 |
| James | 100 | 50 | 67 | 40 | 40 | 86 | 0 | 86 | 71 | 50 | 57 | 0 | 83 | 67 | 50 | 75 | 75 | 50 |
| Goncalves | 67 | — | 100 | 17 | 50 | 60 | 0 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 56 | 43 | 80 | — |
| Hagel | 32 | 10 | 50 | 54 | 67 | 60 | 30 | 60 | 63 | 50 | 50 | 30 | 38 | 50 | 40 | 38 | 78 | 25 |
| Kucherov | 40 | 40 | 40 | 44 | 71 | 82 | 29 | 63 | 67 | 60 | 63 | 29 | 50 | 71 | 47 | 53 | 0 | 50 |
| Bjorkstrand | 80 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 85 | 0 | 80 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 0 | 56 | 69 | 67 | 75 | 75 | 50 |
| Holmberg | 50 | 35 | 38 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 43 | 25 | 20 | 29 | 25 | 55 | 38 | 50 | 33 |
| Hedman | 46 | 31 | 64 | 50 | 67 | 71 | 33 | 75 | 78 | 60 | 56 | 33 | 59 | 68 | 62 | 50 | 80 | 33 |
| Raddysh | 33 | 29 | 33 | 45 | 75 | 80 | 14 | 67 | 50 | 36 | 67 | 25 | 54 | 47 | 36 | 42 | 60 | 50 |
| Lilleberg | 75 | 45 | 55 | 29 | 33 | 89 | 33 | 75 | 78 | 67 | 44 | 33 | 44 | 67 | 69 | 63 | 60 | 56 |
| D'Astous | 50 | 44 | 67 | 29 | 33 | 80 | 44 | 60 | 79 | 79 | 43 | 44 | 55 | 70 | 63 | 44 | 70 | 14 |
| Moser | 30 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 33 | 75 | 29 | 60 | 50 | 20 | 25 | 29 | 30 | 22 | 30 | 38 | 50 | 67 |
| McDonagh | 30 | 18 | 29 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 17 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 27 | 29 | 50 | 0 |
| Cernak | 25 | 20 | 29 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 10 | 50 | 50 | 29 | 25 | 11 | 18 | 29 | 25 | 38 | 0 | 50 |
