Edmonton Oilers vs San Jose Sharks — February 28, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The San Jose Sharks defeated the Edmonton Oilers 5-4 on February 28, 2026. The San Jose Sharks controlled play with 58.4% Corsi and generated 9.24 expected goals compared to 4.42 from the Edmonton Oilers at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The San Jose Sharks created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 7 from the Edmonton Oilers at 5-on-5. Kiefer Sherwood was the most dangerous skater with 3.35 individual expected goals on 5 shots at 5-on-5. The San Jose Sharks outshot the Edmonton Oilers 33-24 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs San Jose Sharks progressed on Feb 28, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

EDM4 - 5SJS

Feb 28, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
SJS	P1	25	20	55.6	20	14	58.8	14	9	60.9	19	16	54.3	8	6	57.1	6.44	3.88	62.4	3	1	75.0
	P2	19	14	57.6	17	9	65.4	13	7	65.0	13	10	56.5	3	1	75.0	3.42	1.75	66.1	0	1	0.0
	P3	15	19	44.1	12	15	44.4	6	8	42.9	9	12	42.9	4	5	44.4	2.31	2.51	47.9	2	2	50.0
	Total	59	53	52.7	49	38	56.3	33	24	57.9	41	38	51.9	15	12	55.6	12.17	8.15	59.9	5	4	55.6
EDM	P1	20	25	44.4	14	20	41.2	9	14	39.1	16	19	45.7	6	8	42.9	3.88	6.44	37.6	1	3	25.0
	P2	14	19	42.4	9	17	34.6	7	13	35.0	10	13	43.5	1	3	25.0	1.75	3.42	33.9	1	0	100.0
	P3	19	15	55.9	15	12	55.6	8	6	57.1	12	9	57.1	5	4	55.6	2.51	2.31	52.1	2	2	50.0
	Total	53	59	47.3	38	49	43.7	24	33	42.1	38	41	48.1	12	15	44.4	8.15	12.17	40.1	4	5	44.4

Win Probability

SJS Favored

EDM Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

SJS

EDM

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

EDM Attempts

SJS Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

EDM ShootSJS Shoot

Shot on Net

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (SJS) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = SJS players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the SJS player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

SJS ↓ / EDM →	McDavid	Roslovic	Draisaitl	Nugent-Hopkins	Frederic	Savoie	Henrique	Lazar	Hyman	Mangiapane	Podkolzin	Kapanen	Walman	Nurse	Stastney	Emberson	Bouchard	Ekholm
Celebrini	43	82	50	50	80	76	78	77	45	59	92	56	73	76	67	58	57	57
Smith	46	76	50	55	70	76	78	75	45	50	92	53	76	75	59	58	54	57
Wennberg	27	43	9	23	60	25	—	75	29	50	50	43	54	55	17	14	20	20
Kurashev	50	63	25	54	67	40	50	75	45	67	40	50	56	63	50	38	33	20
Toffoli	71	62	50	71	56	75	50	50	100	50	0	25	44	44	73	73	100	100
Misa	63	58	50	63	63	75	100	50	67	50	0	33	44	44	80	80	50	50
Goodrow	40	100	20	63	100	0	43	38	44	25	100	50	50	50	67	67	38	100
Ostapchuk	44	100	20	63	100	0	43	29	44	17	100	50	43	50	67	67	43	100
Sherwood	38	79	46	46	88	73	88	77	36	60	91	63	71	76	69	61	45	50
Eklund	70	58	67	70	63	75	100	67	80	67	0	50	44	50	82	80	80	50
Regenda	75	100	100	80	100	—	43	33	75	20	100	100	50	50	67	67	100	100
Graf	17	43	0	18	50	0	0	75	17	57	40	43	45	50	17	0	11	20
Orlov	53	67	40	61	55	70	75	80	54	65	83	63	72	70	71	71	40	50
Klingberg	43	73	25	54	55	67	73	80	50	65	83	60	71	71	67	62	40	50
Desharnais	35	50	40	35	60	50	60	67	36	33	50	38	36	40	46	36	62	80
Ferraro	31	73	25	27	80	80	25	17	25	17	50	50	54	50	70	67	17	25
Mukhamadullin	30	77	13	43	80	71	25	14	22	14	60	33	46	50	70	67	27	25
Dickinson	36	64	41	50	75	45	67	50	36	29	71	25	36	50	42	30	75	80