Game Recap
The Boston Bruins fell to the Philadelphia Flyers 3-1 on Saturday. PHI had a big edge in high-danger chances, 12-4 over BOS at 5-on-5. The numbers backed up the result — PHI generated 7.42 expected goals to BOS's 4.67 at 5-on-5 (50.0% Corsi). Keep an eye on Konecny — 2.14 individual xG on 3 shots at 5-on-5. BOS outshot PHI 27-17.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Boston Bruins vs Philadelphia Flyers progressed on Feb 28, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
BOS1 - 3PHI
Feb 28, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| PHI | P1 | 20 | 18 | 52.6 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 7 | 6 | 53.8 | 18 | 14 | 56.3 | 6 | 0 | 100.0 | 2.18 | 1.83 | 54.4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 19 | 21 | 47.5 | 11 | 19 | 36.7 | 3 | 16 | 15.8 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 4.21 | 2.97 | 58.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 11 | 17 | 39.3 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 7 | 5 | 58.3 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 1.88 | 1.44 | 56.6 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| Total | 50 | 56 | 47.2 | 29 | 41 | 41.4 | 17 | 27 | 38.6 | 43 | 34 | 55.8 | 15 | 4 | 78.9 | 8.27 | 6.24 | 57.0 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| BOS | P1 | 18 | 20 | 47.4 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 6 | 7 | 46.2 | 14 | 18 | 43.8 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 1.83 | 2.18 | 45.6 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 21 | 19 | 52.5 | 19 | 11 | 63.3 | 16 | 3 | 84.2 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 2.97 | 4.21 | 41.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 17 | 11 | 60.7 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 5 | 7 | 41.7 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 1.44 | 1.88 | 43.4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| Total | 56 | 50 | 52.8 | 41 | 29 | 58.6 | 27 | 17 | 61.4 | 34 | 43 | 44.2 | 4 | 15 | 21.1 | 6.24 | 8.27 | 43.0 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
Win Probability
PHI Favored
BOS Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
PHI
BOS
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
BOS Attempts
PHI Attempts
Individual Event Map
BOS ShootPHI Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PHI) performed against every skater on the away team (BOS) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = PHI players, Columns = BOS players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the PHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| PHI ↓ / BOS → | Geekie | Lindholm | Minten | Eyssimont | Khusnutdinov | Zacha | Kuraly | Kastelic | Mittelstadt | Jeannot | Arvidsson | Pastrnak | McAvoy | Lindholm | Jokiharju | Zadorov | Lohrei | Aspirot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Couturier | 44 | 31 | 75 | 86 | 80 | 0 | — | — | 50 | — | 0 | 29 | 45 | 60 | 70 | 60 | 63 | 67 |
| Zegras | 64 | 58 | 30 | 33 | 40 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 67 | 86 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 25 | 76 | 71 | 29 | 50 |
| Dvorak | 36 | 35 | 29 | 33 | 33 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 42 | 29 | 29 | 77 | 80 | 33 | 67 |
| Cates | 86 | 67 | 30 | 40 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 29 | 57 | 63 | 50 | 50 |
| Deslauriers | 33 | 50 | — | — | — | 0 | 33 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 40 | — | 0 | 33 | 0 |
| Tippett | 55 | 43 | 76 | 79 | 73 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 38 | 67 | 50 | 90 | 71 | 50 | 57 |
| Konecny | 67 | 58 | 33 | 43 | 40 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 33 | 57 | 50 | 30 | 80 | 75 | 33 | 50 |
| Grebenkin | 70 | 40 | 87 | 87 | 80 | — | — | — | 100 | — | — | 40 | 71 | 86 | 75 | 63 | 100 | 67 |
| Brink | 100 | 100 | 33 | 33 | 20 | 86 | 25 | 25 | 75 | 67 | 0 | 100 | 33 | 60 | 62 | 33 | 50 | 86 |
| Michkov | 67 | 67 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 33 | 33 | 75 | 33 | 0 | 78 | 50 | 0 | 58 | 56 | 0 | 83 |
| Hathaway | 40 | 50 | 0 | — | — | 0 | 33 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 17 | 13 | 50 | 27 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 0 |
| Grundstrom | 40 | 50 | — | — | — | 0 | 33 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 33 | 50 | — | 0 | 50 | 0 |
| Sanheim | 42 | 38 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 38 | — | 0 | 40 | 10 | 13 | 61 | 60 | 18 | 71 |
| Seeler | 57 | 50 | 67 | 65 | 60 | 0 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 0 | 40 | 57 | 63 | 67 | 56 | 80 | 43 |
| Ristolainen | 45 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 38 | — | 0 | 44 | 25 | 13 | 77 | 70 | 20 | 71 |
| Andrae | 80 | 67 | 75 | 79 | 75 | 0 | 60 | 67 | 33 | 67 | 0 | 67 | 67 | 71 | 77 | 64 | 100 | 43 |
| York | 50 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 60 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 40 |
| Drysdale | 100 | 100 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 63 | 67 | 83 | 67 | 50 | 63 |
