Game Recap
The New York Rangers defeated the Pittsburgh Penguins 3-2 in a shootout on February 28, 2026. The New York Rangers controlled play with 59.0% Corsi and generated 9.29 expected goals compared to 5.50 from the Pittsburgh Penguins at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The New York Rangers created 14 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the Pittsburgh Penguins at 5-on-5. Gabe Perreault was the most dangerous skater with 2.30 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Pittsburgh Penguins outshot the New York Rangers 34-27 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs New York Rangers progressed on Feb 28, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
PIT2 - 3NYR (SO)
Feb 28, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NYR | P1 | 12 | 24 | 33.3 | 6 | 18 | 25.0 | 2 | 10 | 16.7 | 9 | 20 | 31.0 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 1.20 | 3.83 | 23.9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 29 | 20 | 59.2 | 19 | 17 | 52.8 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 23 | 13 | 63.9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 3.92 | 3.81 | 50.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 22 | 11 | 66.7 | 17 | 6 | 73.9 | 10 | 4 | 71.4 | 16 | 7 | 69.6 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 4.89 | 0.61 | 88.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| OT | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.77 | 1.28 | 37.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| SO | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.97 | 0.89 | 52.1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 70 | 64 | 52.2 | 49 | 50 | 49.5 | 27 | 35 | 43.5 | 54 | 48 | 52.9 | 17 | 9 | 65.4 | 11.75 | 10.43 | 53.0 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | |
| PIT | P1 | 24 | 12 | 66.7 | 18 | 6 | 75.0 | 10 | 2 | 83.3 | 20 | 9 | 69.0 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 3.83 | 1.20 | 76.1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 29 | 40.8 | 17 | 19 | 47.2 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 13 | 23 | 36.1 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 3.81 | 3.92 | 49.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 11 | 22 | 33.3 | 6 | 17 | 26.1 | 4 | 10 | 28.6 | 7 | 16 | 30.4 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 0.61 | 4.89 | 11.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| OT | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 0 | 0 | — | 1.28 | 0.77 | 62.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| SO | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.89 | 0.97 | 47.9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 64 | 70 | 47.8 | 50 | 49 | 50.5 | 35 | 27 | 56.5 | 48 | 54 | 47.1 | 9 | 17 | 34.6 | 10.43 | 11.75 | 47.0 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | |
Win Probability
NYR Favored
PIT Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NYR
PIT
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
PIT Attempts
NYR Attempts
Individual Event Map
PIT ShootNYR Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NYR) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NYR players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NYR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NYR ↓ / PIT → | Malkin | Novak | Kindel | Lizotte | Dewar | Acciari | Rust | Rakell | Chinakhov | Hayes | Mantha | Brazeau | Karlsson | Letang | Wotherspoon | Girard | Shea | Clifton |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zibanejad | 44 | 50 | 78 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 43 | 53 | 56 | 57 | 75 | 50 | 67 | 60 | 75 | 71 | 67 |
| Miller | 55 | 83 | 94 | 60 | 50 | 20 | 47 | 35 | 86 | 45 | 62 | 93 | 60 | 75 | 75 | 72 | 64 | 62 |
| Trocheck | 0 | 0 | 63 | 44 | 44 | 38 | 71 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 40 | 56 | 43 | 57 | 44 | 29 |
| Laba | 60 | 75 | 71 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 60 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 69 | 100 | 60 | 67 | 43 |
| Brisson | 67 | 100 | 78 | 38 | 38 | 29 | 67 | 33 | 100 | 33 | 75 | 67 | 50 | 89 | 80 | 83 | 50 | 43 |
| Carrick | 0 | 0 | 86 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 100 | — | 0 | — | 86 | 80 | 40 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 25 | 25 |
| Cuylle | 21 | 19 | 29 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 57 | 50 | 19 | 40 | 40 | 17 | 15 | 57 | 25 | 70 | 17 | 17 |
| Lafrenière | 23 | 23 | 71 | 50 | 50 | 43 | 100 | 100 | 21 | 67 | 75 | 67 | 31 | 73 | 25 | 70 | 50 | 33 |
| Sheary | 50 | 25 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 67 | 75 | 25 | 100 | 57 | 75 | 38 | 70 | 63 | 40 | 71 | 40 |
| Kartye | 67 | 75 | 50 | 40 | 33 | 17 | 50 | 56 | 60 | 67 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 75 | 44 | 55 | 40 |
| Perreault | 86 | 83 | 92 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 50 | 43 | 86 | 36 | 75 | 92 | 78 | 73 | 75 | 71 | 43 | 55 |
| Raddysh | 0 | 0 | 86 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 100 | — | 0 | — | 86 | 80 | 40 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 40 | 40 |
| Fox | 40 | 44 | 79 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 43 | 44 | 50 | 74 | 74 | 33 | 82 | 60 | 83 | 70 | 64 |
| Schneider | 21 | 33 | 88 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 27 | 17 | 40 | 20 | 44 | 86 | 17 | 64 | 44 | 58 | 18 | 17 |
| Gavrikov | 44 | 80 | 78 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 54 | 40 | 80 | 50 | 67 | 73 | 0 | 86 | 71 | 83 | 43 | 50 |
| Borgen | 43 | 30 | 67 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 33 | 38 | 36 | 50 | 46 | 63 | 42 | 53 | 64 | 55 | 18 | 17 |
| Robertson | 47 | 31 | 38 | 67 | 67 | 57 | 50 | 64 | 29 | 73 | 40 | 43 | 52 | 45 | 61 | 43 | 75 | 67 |
| Morrow | 38 | 40 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 75 | 75 | 36 | 78 | 67 | 75 | 50 | 71 | 53 | 50 | 70 | 63 |
